|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

4th February 2005, 09:30 AM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected by Recipient System
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
|
|
Posts: 197
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 0
|
|
Process Auditing for our TS system - Please help and review if you would be so kind
I am going to try and post this for some feedback on Process Auditing for our TS system. I have created an interactive PDF file, so that any idio---person in our organization assigned to the audit team can complete this.
Please let me know your thoughts comments or suggestions. Be kind this is a first pass
Thanks a million
|

5th February 2005, 02:58 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,870
Thanks Given to Others: 142
Thanked 918 Times in 477 Posts
Karma Power: 400
|
|
I think that it is great but you will need to do a lot of training for the use.
As I see it everything is there but hidden and you would only know it by training e.g. I assume that in resources the intention is also to check the calibration status, it could easily be missed. Maybe you should add some more specifics. This would also help to show that you have covered these areas.
__________________
Lean starts with your documentation
Save trees
|

7th February 2005, 09:11 AM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected by Recipient System
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
|
|
Posts: 197
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 0
|
|
|
Thanks for the input, it does require a lot of training, but that is what we need. In the past it has all been check lists and no detail was ever provided, I am trying to get people to give input. Not just yes or no.
|

7th February 2005, 10:49 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Antrim, Ireland
|
|
Posts: 16
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 54 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Internal auditing to the TS "Process approach", this is something we're trying to get our heads around:
1.we're looking to break our company down into "processes", how did you define yours?
2.then from the defined processes, develope a matrix with processes down one side and the TS elements across the top, x-ing those applicable for each process(thus ensuring that no elements have been missed using this process approach)
has anyone used this methodoly before to audit?
any comments/other ideas?
|

7th February 2005, 10:55 AM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected by Recipient System
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
|
|
Posts: 197
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 0
|
|
|
That might possibly work, however to define your processes "be the pellet" so to speak. How does your company operate. Do customers call you to place an order? Then trace it from that.
Here is a sample of our process flow
Let me know your thoughts
|

13th March 2005, 01:14 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,870
Thanks Given to Others: 142
Thanked 918 Times in 477 Posts
Karma Power: 400
|
|
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by Bob Ablondi
You should review the ISO 544 Standard which identifies the Plan-Do-Act methods to do process audits. This is required by the Registrar I do audits for.
|
Please can you check your reference as ISO 544 is the following standard
"Welding consumables -- Technical delivery conditions for welding filler materials -- Type of product, dimensions, tolerances and markings"
__________________
Lean starts with your documentation
Save trees
|

13th March 2005, 11:38 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
|
Posts: 13,389
Thanks Given to Others: 1,805
Thanked 5,401 Times in 3,458 Posts
Karma Power: 1451
|
|
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by IEGeek
Thanks for the input, it does require a lot of training, but that is what we need. In the past it has all been check lists and no detail was ever provided, I am trying to get people to give input. Not just yes or no.
|
Good for you!  Make people actually think about what they're doing, and put it into words. Of course training is necessary, if it weren't you wouldn't need to design a form. I think your form is an excellent starting point, without knowing more about what you're doing specifically. If people don't understand the requirements and expectations of process auditing, they shouldn't be allowed to conduct audits.
__________________
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face (Mike Tyson)
|

13th March 2005, 12:06 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Age: 88
|
|
Posts: 46
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 50 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Here is the correct reference
__________________
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|