The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Medical Devices, Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics > Medical Device Related Regulations > US Medical Device Regulations > 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR)
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

DMR - Device Master Records - What is the best way to structure the DMR


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Atul's
Quality Forum Online

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related LinkedIn Groups

ISO 9001 for Small Businesses

ISO 9001:2015 Revision Discussions

Information Security Community

Medical Devices Group

Quality and Regulatory Network

FDA (Food and Drugs)

AS91XX Series - Tips and Advice


Related Topic Tags
class iii medical device, device master record (dmr), 21 cfr part 820 - med. device mfger. qsr requirements
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 22nd February 2005, 06:29 AM
Microbe

 
 
Total Posts: 20
Please Help! DMR - Device Master Records - What is the best way to structure the DMR

I wonder if it is possible for someone to give me some advice. We are a small medical device company, primarily selling with the EU - so we have technical files/design history files for our products.

We also sell a small amount to the US, but have plans to expand. It is likely that at some stage we will be audited by the FDA. We have in place a DMR within our QMS for each of our products, but it does appear to be a useless and redundant document, as all the information is held elsewhere within our system.

I am fundamentally against having un-necessary documentation, and would ideally like to be able to use the information that we already have ie the technical faile and design history file. If this is not possible, what is the best way to structure the DMR, giving maximum benefit for minimum hassle. Are there any templates out there?

Many thanks for any help/advice offered

Microbe

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 22nd February 2005, 10:06 AM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen

 
 
Total Posts: 3,542
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Microbe

I wonder if it is possible for someone to give me some advice. We are a small medical device company, primarily selling with the EU - so we have technical files/design history files for our products.

We also sell a small amount to the US, but have plans to expand. It is likely that at some stage we will be audited by the FDA. We have in place a DMR within our QMS for each of our products, but it does appear to be a useless and redundant document, as all the information is held elsewhere within our system.

I am fundamentally against having un-necessary documentation, and would ideally like to be able to use the information that we already have ie the technical faile and design history file. If this is not possible, what is the best way to structure the DMR, giving maximum benefit for minimum hassle. Are there any templates out there?

Many thanks for any help/advice offered

Microbe
The DMR is not a document, but a collection of all the documents required to manufacture and test the device. All that is required is an index to point to where the documents are. Your technical file can do this since it too may be an index of where these documents can be found.

Last edited by Al Rosen; 22nd February 2005 at 10:10 AM.
Thanks to Al Rosen for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 23rd February 2005, 06:28 AM
Microbe

 
 
Total Posts: 20
Thanks Al,

We should be able to use the exisiting indexes from our design history files. From my reading, the DMR should be controlled and formally approved for each change. It should list the revisions of all the documents mentioned within it. Am I correct?

I guess that my main problem with the DMR is that I just don't see it's worth. I've seen a number of medical device companies within Europe, and all of them struggle with the concept.

Many thanks
  Post Number #4  
Old 23rd February 2005, 09:44 AM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen

 
 
Total Posts: 3,542
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Microbe

Thanks Al,

We should be able to use the exisiting indexes from our design history files. From my reading, the DMR should be controlled and formally approved for each change. It should list the revisions of all the documents mentioned within it. Am I correct?

I guess that my main problem with the DMR is that I just don't see it's worth. I've seen a number of medical device companies within Europe, and all of them struggle with the concept.

Many thanks
Somewhere you must maintain control of your documents (ISO 13485, 4.2.3). Is there a master list of all of your documents including the revision level? If this contains more than the required documents then you can use a subset or make a notation to identify the documents that are part of the DMR. We have a master list of all our documents. It lists , Title, Document No. & Rev Level. The index has a revision date. Do you have something similar that might be used for this purpose?
  Post Number #5  
Old 23rd February 2005, 02:47 PM
pbojsen's Avatar
pbojsen

 
 
Total Posts: 55
DMR is a document

The DMR at our company is a formally controlled quality system document. Technical files are more Regulatory at our company, and are not accessible to everyone. DMRs are. We are a contract manufacturer. There is one for each product, and we use it as a document index. There are no references to the document revision levels as those are on the documents themselves, as well as the document history, including ECO number. If you need a template I have one.

The principle behind using the DMR as an index all documents, drawings, etc. that are used to build a device is that it makes auditing easier, and is a great resource for new people who are not familiar with the device.

It is structured like this:

DEVICE MASTER RECORD
Product Number:
Revision:
Product Description: (Noun name, modifier, value)
Customer name:
Design history file: (This could be your project file with design xfer.)
Raw materials spec: (doc number, no revision. Go to document
itself for the current revision number and
history.)
Bill of Material: (doc number) BOM has component numbers of
course
Drawing number: (Drawing number(s))
Manufacturing procedures: List doc numbers
Quality assurance procedures: List doc numbers
Fixtures: See individual manufacturing and quality assurance specs. (We do not list fixtures on DMR and in specs. Only at point of use.)
Software: Name software packages
Packaging procedure:
Packaging info: Shelf life in days
Number of units in this configuration that is shipped
(eaches, 10 to a carton, what. A DMR for each
configuration.)
Labeling: Labeling procedure
Label printing spec: Doc number
Post Packaging testing: Doc number
Sterilization: Doc number
Post sterilization inspection and testing: Doc number
Inspection and release procedures: Doc number
Shipping: Doc number

At the end of the document is the revision history including rev. number, effective date, ECO number, and short description of change.

Hope this helps. Also useful for you would be this link:
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/gmpman.html

Included in this manual is what the FDA says a DMR should be. Along with a lot of other info. That should help you a lot.
Thank You to pbojsen for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #6  
Old 8th April 2005, 07:36 PM
mickb

 
 
Total Posts: 8
Advice from an ex FDA Inspector

On a recent training session conducted by 2 ex FDA Inspectors with near 50 years FDA between them we were given the advice that the DMR should be the instructions on how to build the product. It is a shopping list, the recipe and instructions, complete with all diagrams and drawings. It should also have reference to the way you designed the product and show what steps you have taken to improve or change the product.

Our DMR was a simple list of all procedures, drawings, etc, in fact everything that went near the product was listed. The 2 ex FDA inspectors said our list did comply with 21 CFR pt 820 but it was not what was intended, it was not in the spirit of 21 CFR pt 820 and it was a pretty useless document.

If the DMR is constructed to show the build/manufacture sequence of the product it can also be linked and constructed to resemble the DHR as well because the ingredients and processes used to make the product follow the same order. That way explaining the 2 to an auditor is so simple.

If the same product is packaged into many configurations then build the product to the point where the packaging and labelling are different as one DMR and then form the last part of the DMR as multiple Bills of Materials and marry the 2 together to show the configuration of the final product.

If anyone has a DMR they are willing to share, please do as we are trying to change ours for the better. All ideas welcome.

Mick B
Thank You to mickb for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #7  
Old 11th April 2005, 01:58 PM
pbojsen's Avatar
pbojsen

 
 
Total Posts: 55
Our DMRs are constructed to follow the manufacturing sequence. It's easy for manufacturing personnel to follow. The DMRs also contain the design information by mapping back to our customer's design transfer file.

DMRs are very dependent upon what product you're making. For my company to construct a DMR according to the instructions the ex-FDA instructors gave you would be highly impractical for our business.

To see an example of what the FDA thinks a DMR should look like, please see that attached DMR info from an FDA publication. Personally, I don't like it.
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting this post, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: doc Device Master Records.doc (597.5 KB, 4289 views)
Thank You to pbojsen for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #8  
Old 22nd October 2005, 05:53 PM
Chan J

 
 
Total Posts: 9
Must all documents in DMR/DMF be approved 1st

Hello, our contractors are helping us out in a portion of designing and pre-paring it for pre-production of our product. We are getting our CE mark for our product and hence our manufacturers need to only meet the 13485 requirements. I believe in 13485, it is not needed to have a DMR but just some contents of the DMR. Two questions arouse as I was in the process of preparing them for the audit.


i) Can the file containing all the documents for the DMR have another name (currently, they call it a project file, and what it contains are design inputs, outputs,review, verification, engineering drawings, BOM, production processes.)

ii) must all the documents have approval signature(s)? Are e-mails sufficient enough as objective evidence that the documents has been approved?

I've read the DMR guidance attached in this forum on the signature and approval part, but as I know DMR is more to the FDA requirement and not ISO13485.Can anyone share their experiences and hopefully answer my questions as well...thanks a million.
Thanks to Chan J for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Medical Devices, Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics > Medical Device Related Regulations > US Medical Device Regulations > 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR)

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Device Master Records for a Contract Manufacturer SGquality 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4 19th May 2015 10:45 PM
Master List of Records, req 8.2.4 entry juliov ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3 22nd November 2012 01:11 PM
Master List of Records Required? ISO9001:2008 Clause 4.2.4 Control of Records Noj Soma ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6 7th April 2009 06:58 PM
Question regarding Device Master Records & Specification Developers Jim-S 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5 12th November 2008 11:01 AM
DMR Index - Can someone share their Device Master Record Index structure or format? sardonyx ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 15 31st December 2007 11:05 AM



The time now is 05:08 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" -- The Elsmar Cove is *Copyright Free*.
A Peachfarm LLC Internet Property