|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread Content | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Week 9 Student Discussion - Lean and JIT
“Lean” and “Just in Time” are definitely current concerns of American corporations. What is meant by these two terms, and what advantages do they propose to bring to a corporation? What is meant by “push” versus “pull” with relation to JIT?
__________________
Steve Prevette "A Passionate Statistician", ASQ CQE, ASQ Fellow |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
By using Aggregate planning and paying attention to details several businesses, e.g. Wal-mart, have been able to maximaize just-in-time and lean production. They stay lean by keeping inventory to a bare minimum and focusing on what the customer wants and when they want it. If they make an order and merchandise does not arrive on time they have identified a problem and use the just in time philosophy, (an ongoing problem solving process), to make the necessary corrections.
Wal-mart has used the pull system by having materials produced only when they need them. This is totally the opposite from the push method where suppliers would be pushing materials on Wal-mart regardless if they needed them or not, thereby driving up inventory costs and creating situations where they have things they don't need. We have seen this with K-mart. The advantages are obvious in the case of wal-mart. They have capitalized on these processes to get ahead of the competition and now use their overwhelming size squeeze them out of business. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sipoc
Quote:
The push system forces material downstream through the system to next workstations regardless of whether the materials are needed or wanted. Steve used a very good example in class of a push system. The image of Lucy working in the candy factory with the candy bars continuing to pile up on the assembly line while Lucy struggles with the packaging process. "Lucy you got some 'splaining to do". |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
From the research that I did on Dell and what we saw in the book they are a good example of a pull system. They do not start the assembly process for your computer until after you make your customized order. I believe three times a day they tell their suppliers what parts they need and pull in their supplies off of demand. That is how I see the pull system working. It is built off of the real demand and the push system is built off of the forcasted demand or the capabilities of the plant. The pull system can eliminate the waste or shortage when the forecast does not match the real demand.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Steve Prevette "A Passionate Statistician", ASQ CQE, ASQ Fellow |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Some of you students work in an agricultural mileu. If you grow grain, you have to "predict" how much grain you'll sell to plan amount of seed to sow. A Granary has to plan how many storehouses to build to accommodate projected need for storage of grain. Mills have to plan how much grain to buy to make flour. Bakers have to plan how much flour to order to make bread to put on the shelf for the retail customer to come in and "demand" a loaf of bread. The only one in the entire chain who can be a "pull" buyer based on demand (his stomach growls) is the retail buyer. Similar disconnects in the supply chain abound in every industry. Cars? - mines for ore, steel mills for ingots or billets, rolling mills and foundries for sheet metal and engine blocks, manufacturers to have showroom samples in dealerships, all so consumer can walk in and "demand" one off the lot or wait a long lead time for one to be built. Computers? Consumer and Dell may pull, but chip makers, motherboards, cases, wires, solder, manufacturing plants, etc. ALL have to plan and purchase ahead based on estimate of future demand. All those folks Dell orders from have merely had the burden of holding inventory transferred to them from Dell. There is still pre-made inventory sitting on someone's shelf waiting to ship to Dell for final assembly.
__________________
"Few minds wear out; more rust out" Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857 |
Lower Navigation Bar
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Bookmarks |
| Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate Thread Content |
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
||||
| Discussion Thread Title | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post or Poll Vote |
| Closed or Resolved: New Topic every week for discussion | blue moon | Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports | 4 | 17th October 2009 10:45 PM |
| Week 8 Student Discussion - Systems Thinking | Steve Prevette | Archive - City University - MC 550 Operational Management | 6 | 10th March 2005 12:00 PM |
| Week 5 Student Discussion - Work Standards | Steve Prevette | Archive - City University - MC 550 Operational Management | 8 | 10th March 2005 10:31 AM |
| Week 4 Student Discussion - Process Analysis | Steve Prevette | Archive - City University - MC 550 Operational Management | 4 | 10th March 2005 10:18 AM |
| Week 3 Student Discussion - Design | Steve Prevette | Archive - City University - MC 550 Operational Management | 9 | 31st January 2005 09:00 PM |