The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th April 2005, 03:28 PM
rich.dittmanjr rich.dittmanjr is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bangor, Maine
Age: 45
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
rich.dittmanjr has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Listen To Me! Measurement Uncertainty (MU) Budget for a 0-1 inch Micrometer

I am a newbie to the uncertainty world. I started working in our lab a couple years ago and noticed that we should be working to ISO standards and not to the 1960’s mil specs. Long story short, I need a little guidance to see if I am on the right trail. We work in inch, so everything on my budget is in inches.
I also made an assumption that a 0-1 micrometer with a .001 resolution could be raised to a .0005 resolution due to the large space between the graduations on the barrel.
I have enclose the budget for people to look at, and to give me some feed back.
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting the post it is in, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: pdf output.pdf (40.7 KB, 198 views)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 14th April 2005, 12:19 AM
Hershal's Avatar
Hershal Hershal is online now
Metrologist-Auditor

Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal, California, U.S.
Age: 53
 
Posts: 1,623
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 310 Times in 224 Posts
Karma Power: 186
Karma: 6526
Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

The budget looks reasonable to me.....seems like you took into account at least the major contributors of MU.....

The space between the marks of the barrel might be best left alone.....if you let folks measure using the dead space, you now add parallax error, which will be equal to the resolution error (0.0005"), and so the MU will likely increase.

Hershal
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 14th April 2005, 08:03 AM
rich.dittmanjr rich.dittmanjr is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bangor, Maine
Age: 45
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
rich.dittmanjr has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Thumbs up Resolution Error

Thank you for your feedback Hershal. I feel a little more confident moving forward on other gages now.
The resolution of the micrometer still bugs me. I have read many different articles saying you can use the area between the vernier etch marks as a half increment. I also read you do not do that.
At this plant they normally round to the .001 and don’t estimate the distance between the marks. I feel safe because in this case, the calibration uncertainty based on .0005, would then be safe.
On the other hand, the Manufacturing team should not be using gages that do not meet the 10% resolution rule.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th May 2005, 08:23 AM
rich.dittmanjr rich.dittmanjr is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bangor, Maine
Age: 45
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
rich.dittmanjr has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Is this right?

I sent a 0-1 inch vernier micrometer with .001 resolution to the calibration lab that we use for other gages. I did this to get a start on setting up our uncertainty and also do a little inter-lab comparison. When I saw what they had for stated uncertainty, I am really questioning the credibility of this lab. I cannot see how you can get +/- .000083 uncertainty from a vernier micrometer. Am I missing something?
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting the post it is in, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: pdf Calibration Report.pdf (180.5 KB, 553 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Measurement Uncertainty Budget (MU) of Ultrasonic Thickness gage? ScottBP Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4 8th June 2009 03:58 PM
Measurement Uncertainty Budget for Comparative Dimensional Measurements JoeQNovice Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 8 23rd June 2008 09:54 PM
Contributing Factors in a Supermicrometer Measurement Uncertainty Budget? Mchurch Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 8 5th June 2008 09:15 AM
Measurement Uncertainty for Adjustable Thread Rings but No Budget Made CalRich Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4 26th March 2007 12:31 PM
QUERIES On ISO 17025 AUDIT - Measurement Uncertainty Budget, etc. neo_inst Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1 20th November 2002 03:48 PM



The time now is 04:45 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts