|
|
|
View Poll Results: PPAP & APQP should be part of CQE-BOK
|
|
yes
|
  
|
6 |
35.29% |
|
No
|
  
|
11 |
64.71% |
 |

29th April 2005, 12:46 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: CANADA
|
|
Posts: 666
Thanks Given to Others: 56
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 35 Karma: 155  
|
|
ASQ - CQE does not include info about PPAP
Hi folks
I read CQE BOK and noticed that PPAP & AQAP is not included in the BOK. It has some information about FMEA why not include these 2 above mentioned ingredients.
Please cast your vote
|

29th April 2005, 12:58 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wellington, OH USA
Age: 69
|
|
Posts: 1,604
Thanks Given to Others: 80
Thanked 289 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 149
|
|
The reasoning could be that PPAP is specifically an automotive requirement. I think APQP principles are addressed in the BOK although not by the name APQP. Again, this may be because it is although thought of as automotive (by that name). As there are many quality people out there who are nothing to do with automotive, I would not be in favor of including them as specific sections. I certainly think the concept and quality tools used in those disciplines are usefull and should be included.
Dave
__________________
"Time you enjoyed wasting is not wasted time"
|

29th April 2005, 02:24 PM
|
 |
qualitas ad nauseam
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Age: 50
|
|
Posts: 653
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 34 Times in 15 Posts
Karma Power: 79
|
|
I agree, Dave. Any industry specific procedures should not be part of the body of knowldge of quality engineering skills and methods. PPAP is made up of both administrative tasks (submission package / paperwork) and quality assurance activities (gage R&R, capability studies, inspection results, etc.). The former is simply procedural, not a skill set. The latter is definitely related to QA and IS in the BOK. The gist of the thought process for APQP is also addressed in the BOK.
Also, FMEA is fairly well known across industries and is rightly addressed.
__________________
Rob - The sum of anecdotes is not data. -Roger Brinner
|

29th April 2005, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 9,215
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,295 Times in 1,549 Posts
Karma Power: 611
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rob Nix
I agree, Dave. Any industry specific procedures should not be part of the body of knowldge of quality engineering skills and methods. PPAP is made up of both administrative tasks (submission package / paperwork) and quality assurance activities (gage R&R, capability studies, inspection results, etc.). The former is simply procedural, not a skill set. The latter is definitely related to QA and IS in the BOK. The gist of the thought process for APQP is also addressed in the BOK.
Also, FMEA is fairly well known across industries and is rightly addressed.
|
Exactly.
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|