|
|
 |

11th May 2005, 05:41 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: May 2005
Location: Czech Republic
|
|
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 19 Karma: 10 
|
|
Some questions about Cmk and Cpk
Hello Marc,
Sorry I´m new at this.I´m looking but not finding a general statement how to right doing the capability of machine (CNC lathe). I heard that the machine have to be in controlled conditions. What does it mean? May I use automatic compensation of cutting tool (wear of tool) when this function is available? I think during machining of batch of 50 pieces for study?
What is different between Cmk and Cpk? Can anyone gives me any answer or the right method how to do capability of machine.
Thank for your help.
|

11th May 2005, 10:18 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Oct 2004
Location: DuBois, PA
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 612
Thanks Given to Others: 109
Thanked 234 Times in 149 Posts
Karma Power: 94 Karma: 3086 

|
|
First things first.....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hennry
What is different between Cmk and Cpk? Can anyone gives me any answer or the right method how to do capability of machine.
Thank for your help.
|
Before jumping into a process capability study, perform a Gage R&R. If you aren't getting reliable measurements than any data you collect is suspect, and irregardless of the capability index you use, the results are suspect.
Second, run some control charts to determine whether your system is stable.
If memory serves me correct, there isn't a huge difference between Cpk and Cmk as they both take the target into consideration.
Wayne
|

14th May 2005, 02:20 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
|
|
Posts: 6
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 19 Karma: 10 
|
|
one additional thought
Hello Hennry,
Just wanted to add some thoughts to Wayne’s comments. It is important to understand that your calculated Cpk results are going to be invalid unless your process is in a state of statistical control. This is why it is important to do the control charts (following the gage R&R of course). Once you eliminate any special or assignable causes on your control charts, you should only see natural or inherent variation on the chart. It is then ok to perform a Cpk study.
Regards,
Rob O’Brien
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
A question about Cpk and Cmk - Can we use Cpk to replace Cmk?
|
sunwen |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
1 |
11th April 2007 08:45 AM |
|
Evaluating software that measures Ppk, Cmk, Cpk, PPI, etc.
|
Cemm Mex |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
5 |
21st June 2004 09:28 PM |
|
Cmk and Cpk - When will we need to calculate Cmk? Machine Capability
|
Stevenli |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
3 |
20th August 2003 09:18 PM |
|
Cpk, Cmk in electronic assembly
|
anilo |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
4 |
19th March 2003 04:29 PM |
|
Any ideas on setting up Capability study spreadsheet in Excel?(CPK/CMK formulae)
|
bagpuss |
Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools |
4 |
2nd March 2001 11:39 AM |
|
|