The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Process Audits and Layered Process Audits


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th June 2005, 04:09 PM
Charles Corn Charles Corn is offline
Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Carolina, USA
Age: 51
 
Posts: 11
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 24
Karma: 15
Charles Corn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Standard for TS 16949 process audits?

Hi everyone,

Recently, during a 2nd party audit (ISO/TS 16949:2002 systems audit), the auditor stated that our internal audit program couldn't utilize the TS specification for our process audits and rather that process audits had to be conducted 'versus the process using the process itself as a basis for the audit'.

Am I totally out to lunch on this? I know that the TS specification is designed for systems, but why can't the elements be used for a process audit?

Thanks,

CC
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 9th June 2005, 05:14 PM
TedCambron TedCambron is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
 
Posts: 69
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23
Karma: 61
TedCambron has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default systems audit

What do you mean, systems audit? I'm new here.
What do you mean, conducted 'versus the process using the process itself as a basis for the audit'? Are you quoting this correctly?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 9th June 2005, 05:20 PM
ralphsulser's Avatar
ralphsulser ralphsulser is offline
Quality Team

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
 
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
Karma: 3387
ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Reference TS16949 page 27,
8.2.2.1 Quality management systems audit

8.2.2.2 Manufacturing process audit

8.2.2.3 Product audit

I don't understand what your 2nd party auditor was talking about, makes no sense.
We just recently passed a 3rd party conformance audit, and had evidence of all 3 types of audits.
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th June 2005, 05:32 PM
Kevin H's Avatar
Kevin H Kevin H is offline
Quality Metallurgist

Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Pennsylvania, USA
Age: 57
 
Posts: 466
Thanks Given to Others: 19
Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Karma Power: 54
Karma: 1123
Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Kevin H is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Default

I agree with Ralph that 3 types of audits are called for by TS. Further, it is allowed to combine the audits so that one audit in your system ccould be both a management system audit and a process audit, or a process audit and a product audit. You need to clearly identify in the audit scope the type of audit/audit combination being performed.

Process audits should concentrate on the manufacturing process - what are the inuts, what are you doing in the process, how do you control them, what is the ouput, etc. You'll should touch on more than one "element" during a process audit, such as control of non-conforming/suspect material, training, document control, measuring equipment, continual improvement, corrective & preventive actions, ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th June 2005, 01:51 AM
Howard Atkins's Avatar
Howard Atkins Howard Atkins is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
 
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Blog Entries: 8
Karma Power: 195
Karma: 4817
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Howard Atkins
Default

IMO there is continuously misunderstandings here.
The audits, including system audits, should all be performed in a process manner, that means according to the definitions of the process for example in the turtle diagram.
The process audit in 8.2.2.2 is the audit of the manufacturing process which should also be in a process manner.
As I see it the main requirement of 8.2.2.2 is each manufacturing process, according to QS etc. it was possible to skip some manufacturing processes and still conform.
The clauses of the standard still exist what ever you audit and the requirements are still there
When you audit a manufacturing process you will look for on the job training no matter what, if you call it 6.2.2.3 or OJT is irrelevant
__________________
You can’t fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
* William S. Burroughs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th June 2005, 07:42 AM
Charles Corn Charles Corn is offline
Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Carolina, USA
Age: 51
 
Posts: 11
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 24
Karma: 15
Charles Corn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Just to clarify my question a little bit (as it seems that I perhaps didn;t explain it properly): The auditor challenged that I had conducted process audits using TS/ISO 16949, he tried to tell me that I couldn't use TS to do a process audit and that TS was ONLY for systems auditing!

Clearly this is some definition of auditing that I am hitherto unfamiliar with!

Thank you all for weighing in on this, I walked away from that audit session feeling dumbfounded.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th June 2005, 10:01 AM
ralphsulser's Avatar
ralphsulser ralphsulser is offline
Quality Team

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
 
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
Karma: 3387
ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Corn

Just to clarify my question a little bit (as it seems that I perhaps didn;t explain it properly): The auditor challenged that I had conducted process audits using TS/ISO 16949, he tried to tell me that I couldn't use TS to do a process audit and that TS was ONLY for systems auditing!

Clearly this is some definition of auditing that I am hitherto unfamiliar with!

Thank you all for weighing in on this, I walked away from that audit session feeling dumbfounded.
Well, I can understand why you felt bumbfounded...I think you should find out the auditors training and competency. I think he missed something.
If you are going for TS, you better be auditing your manufacturing processes.
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th June 2005, 12:23 PM
TedCambron TedCambron is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
 
Posts: 69
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23
Karma: 61
TedCambron has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default A word from the wise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Atkins

IMO there is continuously misunderstandings here.
The audits, including system audits, should all be performed in a process manner, that means according to the definitions of the process for example in the turtle diagram.
The process audit in 8.2.2.2 is the audit of the manufacturing process which should also be in a process manner.
As I see it the main requirement of 8.2.2.2 is each manufacturing process, according to QS etc. it was possible to skip some manufacturing processes and still conform.
The clauses of the standard still exist what ever you audit and the requirements are still there
When you audit a manufacturing process you will look for on the job training no matter what, if you call it 6.2.2.3 or OJT is irrelevant
That makes sense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Process Audits and Layered Process Audits

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Process Approach Requirement for Internal Audits in TS 16949 Howard Atkins ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 33 25th May 2009 12:58 PM
LPAs (Layered Process Audits) and TS 16949 Clause 8.2.2.2 - Quick Question jkittle Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 20 4th March 2008 08:40 AM
Process based Internal Audits, instead of auditing to the elements of the standard 5litre Internal Auditing 21 18th July 2007 12:56 PM
Planning Internal Process Audits to the new standard - ISO 9001:2000 VickiC Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 7 11th January 2005 06:53 AM
TS 16949 Audits - Manufacturing Process (8.2.2.2) - Product (8.2.2.3) paulnguyen ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8 9th August 2002 09:47 AM



The time now is 01:53 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts