|
|
 |

9th June 2005, 04:09 PM
|
|
Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Carolina, USA
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 11
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 24 Karma: 15 
|
|
Standard for TS 16949 process audits?
Hi everyone,
Recently, during a 2nd party audit (ISO/TS 16949:2002 systems audit), the auditor stated that our internal audit program couldn't utilize the TS specification for our process audits and rather that process audits had to be conducted 'versus the process using the process itself as a basis for the audit'.
Am I totally out to lunch on this? I know that the TS specification is designed for systems, but why can't the elements be used for a process audit?
Thanks,
CC
|

9th June 2005, 05:14 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
|
|
Posts: 69
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23 Karma: 61 
|
|
systems audit
What do you mean, systems audit? I'm new here.
What do you mean, conducted 'versus the process using the process itself as a basis for the audit'? Are you quoting this correctly?
|

9th June 2005, 05:20 PM
|
 |
Quality Team
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
|
|
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
|
|
Reference TS16949 page 27,
8.2.2.1 Quality management systems audit
8.2.2.2 Manufacturing process audit
8.2.2.3 Product audit
I don't understand what your 2nd party auditor was talking about, makes no sense.
We just recently passed a 3rd party conformance audit, and had evidence of all 3 types of audits.
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
|

9th June 2005, 05:32 PM
|
 |
Quality Metallurgist
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western Pennsylvania, USA
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 466
Thanks Given to Others: 19
Thanked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Karma Power: 54
|
|
I agree with Ralph that 3 types of audits are called for by TS. Further, it is allowed to combine the audits so that one audit in your system ccould be both a management system audit and a process audit, or a process audit and a product audit. You need to clearly identify in the audit scope the type of audit/audit combination being performed.
Process audits should concentrate on the manufacturing process - what are the inuts, what are you doing in the process, how do you control them, what is the ouput, etc. You'll should touch on more than one "element" during a process audit, such as control of non-conforming/suspect material, training, document control, measuring equipment, continual improvement, corrective & preventive actions, ...
|

10th June 2005, 01:51 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Karma Power: 195
|
|
IMO there is continuously misunderstandings here.
The audits, including system audits, should all be performed in a process manner, that means according to the definitions of the process for example in the turtle diagram.
The process audit in 8.2.2.2 is the audit of the manufacturing process which should also be in a process manner.
As I see it the main requirement of 8.2.2.2 is each manufacturing process, according to QS etc. it was possible to skip some manufacturing processes and still conform.
The clauses of the standard still exist what ever you audit and the requirements are still there
When you audit a manufacturing process you will look for on the job training no matter what, if you call it 6.2.2.3 or OJT is irrelevant
__________________
You can’t fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
* William S. Burroughs
|

10th June 2005, 07:42 AM
|
|
Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Carolina, USA
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 11
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 24 Karma: 15 
|
|
Just to clarify my question a little bit (as it seems that I perhaps didn;t explain it properly): The auditor challenged that I had conducted process audits using TS/ISO 16949, he tried to tell me that I couldn't use TS to do a process audit and that TS was ONLY for systems auditing!
Clearly this is some definition of auditing that I am hitherto unfamiliar with!
Thank you all for weighing in on this, I walked away from that audit session feeling dumbfounded.
|

10th June 2005, 10:01 AM
|
 |
Quality Team
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
|
|
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Charles Corn
Just to clarify my question a little bit (as it seems that I perhaps didn;t explain it properly): The auditor challenged that I had conducted process audits using TS/ISO 16949, he tried to tell me that I couldn't use TS to do a process audit and that TS was ONLY for systems auditing!
Clearly this is some definition of auditing that I am hitherto unfamiliar with!
Thank you all for weighing in on this, I walked away from that audit session feeling dumbfounded. 
|
Well, I can understand why you felt bumbfounded...I think you should find out the auditors training and competency. I think he missed something.
If you are going for TS, you better be auditing your manufacturing processes.
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
|

10th June 2005, 12:23 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH USA
|
|
Posts: 69
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 23 Karma: 61 
|
|
A word from the wise.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Howard Atkins
IMO there is continuously misunderstandings here.
The audits, including system audits, should all be performed in a process manner, that means according to the definitions of the process for example in the turtle diagram.
The process audit in 8.2.2.2 is the audit of the manufacturing process which should also be in a process manner.
As I see it the main requirement of 8.2.2.2 is each manufacturing process, according to QS etc. it was possible to skip some manufacturing processes and still conform.
The clauses of the standard still exist what ever you audit and the requirements are still there
When you audit a manufacturing process you will look for on the job training no matter what, if you call it 6.2.2.3 or OJT is irrelevant
|
That makes sense.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|