The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st July 2005, 01:42 PM
al40's Avatar
al40 al40 is offline
Appreciated Member

 
Registration Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
 
Posts: 474
Thanks Given to Others: 86
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Karma Power: 83
Karma: 714
al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Please Help! Traceability - No traceability records back to the supplier - Electronic Components

We're implementing ISO 9001:2000 and I'm currently working in the stockroom and have found hundreds of electronic componets (Resistors, IC's, capacitors, etc) that need to be inventoried under our system, the problem I've found is that there is no records of traceability back to the orginal supplier. If I have these parts inventoried and then inspected can they be used (i.e. a job summary card showing the inspection, AQL and internal lot number assigned to the parts)?

Thanks,

Allen

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 1st July 2005, 02:00 PM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen Al Rosen is offline
Super Moderator

 
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 62
 
Posts: 3,547
Thanks Given to Others: 71
Thanked 717 Times in 442 Posts
Karma Power: 413
Karma: 7090
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Rosen
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Allen M.

We're implementing ISO 9001:2000 and I'm currently working in the stockroom and have found hundreds of electronic componets (Resistors, IC's, capacitors, etc) that need to be inventoried under our system, the problem I've found is that there is no records of traceability back to the orginal supplier. If I have these parts inventoried and then inspected can they be used (i.e. a job summary card showing the inspection, AQL and internal lot number assigned to the parts)?

Thanks,

Allen
It depends. What industry are you in and does your system allow you to do this? Do you have a contractual requirement for traceability? Are these components (each individual part no.) from the same lot? Would you be treating them as if they were from the same lot and if so would you be willing to recall all of them if in the future a problem was found? Chances are you won't be faced with this, but should consider all possibilities. I had been faced with a similar situation in the past and did more than just a routine inspection to "qualify" the parts.
__________________
Al
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 1st July 2005, 02:59 PM
al40's Avatar
al40 al40 is offline
Appreciated Member

 
Registration Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
 
Posts: 474
Thanks Given to Others: 86
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Karma Power: 83
Karma: 714
al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.al40 is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Al Rosen

It depends. What industry are you in and does your system allow you to do this? Do you have a contractual requirement for traceability? Are these components (each individual part no.) from the same lot? Would you be treating them as if they were from the same lot and if so would you be willing to recall all of them if in the future a problem was found? Chances are you won't be faced with this, but should consider all possibilities. I had been faced with a similar situation in the past and did more than just a routine inspection to "qualify" the parts.
Please adivise on how you handled this?

to answer your questions:
a) We develop new products based on various forms of research.
b) Yes we have some contracts that require traceabiltiy
c) I have no ideal what lots or P.O. these parts are from, they were found during an audit and could not be tied back to a PO the parts are worth thousands of dollars and I can't see throwing them away.

d) If we had problems then yes the parts would have to be recalled.


Last edited by al40; 1st July 2005 at 03:32 PM.
  #4  
Old 1st July 2005, 05:38 PM
sardonyx's Avatar
sardonyx sardonyx is offline
Involved - Posts

 
Registration Date: Jul 2004
Location: US
 
Posts: 95
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 45
Karma: 27
sardonyx has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I would say you can still use those components such as resistors, capacitors, ICs etc. My suggestion is to find out the manufacturer's part number of each components and trace it back from your approved manufacturer's/vendor's list. And from there, you can find out your internal part number and store those under that number with approval of your quality or component engineer ( if you do have). But make sure to double check the manufacturing date of the components and if you have procedure on how many years you have to store them. Otherwise you can sell them to companies that sponsor "hard to find components," or send them to your engineering department, they can use them for their testing.
  #5  
Old 5th July 2005, 10:01 AM
Jim Howe Jim Howe is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected by Recipient System

 
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
 
Posts: 415
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 235
Jim Howe is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.Jim Howe is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.Jim Howe is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
testing old electronic parts

In the past we had to perform testing of the parts. Any test we could not perform was sub-contracted. These test also included solderability testing. Whatever the part numbers, there exist, a specification upon which the part was manufactured and tested. In my opinion, if your intent is to use these parts to satisfy customer requirements then you must be able to stand behind them. You may find, however, that the expense and record keeping is prohibitive. In many cases we simply threw them out and performed retest only for high dollar items. Resistors, capacitors, etc. may not be worth it if you consider the retest cost and liability.
  #6  
Old 5th July 2005, 11:59 AM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

 
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,819
Thanks Given to Others: 28
Thanked 73 Times in 53 Posts
Karma Power: 230
Karma: 1969
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
[QUOTE=Allen M.]
b) Yes we have some contracts that require traceabiltiy
QUOTE]

For these contracts, the answer, is no, you can't use them.

For contracts that do not require traceability, you'd have to determine if it was economically worth the risk.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Relying on Supplier Records for Material Traceability - Bar stock and forgings dtr18c ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 11 31st January 2010 10:21 PM
Traceability SOP Audit Finding - Does not describe the extent of the traceability Tiffany ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 13 21st August 2009 12:01 PM
New Part Traceability - Lot number and finished product traceability pammesue ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 3 26th February 2009 11:37 AM
Traceability Required for ALL Components? AS9100 Clause 7.5.3 clara AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 3 11th January 2007 06:56 AM
Electronic Components traceability - Development Laboratory al40 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 6 16th September 2005 07:01 AM



The time now is 08:50 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272