|
|
 |

7th July 2005, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada / Toronto
|
|
Posts: 38
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 22 Karma: 10 
|
|
How to calculate the sigma level of a process - Which one is right
I am confuse the how to calculate the sgima level of process, please tell me below which one is right and which is wrong clearly.
We have 1,000,000 productions, find defect is 8,000. defect opportunity is 1.
Then case 1
DPMO is 8,000 according to the ASQ six sigmal primer appendix, the sigmal level is 2.9 sigma(with 1.5 shift)
case2
DPU is 0.008 DPMO=0.008
Y= RTY= e-DPU=0.992
Probablity of defect is P(d)=1-Y = 1-0.992=0.008
then use Z value table is 2.41
and add 1.5 shift, then the sigma level is 2.41+1.5=3.9 sigmal
Case3.
using formula sigmal level= 0.8406+ SQRT(29.37-(2.221*ln(PPM)))
then 0.846+SQRT(29.37-(2.221*ln8000))=3.9 sigmal
question 1:
the resuult of case 2 and 3 are different with case1 which one is right?
question2:
if we want to know the cpk of this process, is 8,000/1,000,000=0.8% just P value(because it is attribute data), that is right?
thanks
Michael
|

7th July 2005, 01:29 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jun 2005
Location: india
|
|
Posts: 33
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 18 Karma: 15 
|
|
Good to have doubt.....It's a way to gain knowledge
I have been using the Case-2 i.e. taking help of Z table - a De Facto standard.
Thanks,,
|

7th July 2005, 06:26 PM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Age: 46
|
|
Posts: 900
Thanks Given to Others: 27
Thanked 249 Times in 150 Posts
Karma Power: 123
|
|
There is an online calculator at
http://www.isixsigma.com/sixsigma/si...asp?m=advanced
It agrees with the second two calculations (i.e. 3.9 sigma). I have to assume the table you used in Case 1 is wrong. Perhaps it was for a shift of 0.5 instead of 1.5. Perhaps it was simply mis-typed.
Tim F
__________________
To wonder is to begin to understand.
|

24th July 2005, 06:26 PM
|
|
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
|
|
Posts: 58
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 24 
|
|
Six sigma always refers to short term capability
Due to higher sources of variation, long term capability is alway lower than short term capability.
Six sigma always refers to short term capability. A factor of 1.5 sigma is applied to account for common cause meanshift which can happen both in favorable or unfavorable directions.
Six sigma capability in Short term is expected to reduce upto 6-1.5= 4.5 sigma in Long term. When you divide sigma by 3, you get capability. This means that short term six sigma or capability of 2.0 is expected to reduce to 4.5 sigma or capability of 1.50.
In your case, if you are interested in short term, sigma value is 3.9 which can reduce to 2.4 in long term.
Hope this clarifies.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|