The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Software Quality Assurance


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th July 2005, 06:15 AM
cjohnson cjohnson is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: London, UK
Age: 50
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
cjohnson has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Integrating offshore development into our QMS? Software Development

Hi - New to this site, so I hope this question is in the right forum.

I'm a Quality Manager for software development company in London, UK, and we are ISO9001:2000 registered.

We have recently decided to move a large proportion of our development over to India. The company we are using are not ISO9000, but are at CMM Level 5. They are creating a dedicated workforce specifically for our use, and will be required to follow our QMS procedures, development lifecycle & policies.

I am wondering what changes I would need to make to our documented QMS, and what effect this would have on our ISO9001 registration?

I probably haven't given enough information here, but at this stage I don't really know what the questions are, never mind the answers to them !

All help appreciated.

Thanks.....

Last edited by cjohnson; 28th July 2005 at 06:23 AM. Reason: Change of title
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 28th July 2005, 07:31 AM
Paul Simpson's Avatar
Paul Simpson Paul Simpson is offline
Looking for Solutions

Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 48
 
Posts: 1,302
Thanks Given to Others: 280
Thanked 295 Times in 199 Posts
Blog Entries: 3
Karma Power: 122
Karma: 3232
Paul Simpson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Paul Simpson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Paul Simpson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Paul Simpson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Paul Simpson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjohnson

We have recently decided to move a large proportion of our development over to India. The company we are using are not ISO9000, but are at CMM Level 5. They are creating a dedicated workforce specifically for our use, and will be required to follow our QMS procedures, development lifecycle & policies.
The standard requires that you control processes that are contracted out. The fact you are requiring them to follow your procedures would satisfy this requirement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjohnson

I am wondering what changes I would need to make to our documented QMS, and what effect this would have on our ISO9001 registration?
Again if your purchasing procedures cover CMM Level 5 as being the criteria you use for contractors then no change needed. What I would recommend you do is take a risk based look at contracting out - what could go wrong with offshore development, what could it lead to and, based on the risks you identify, what controls would you want to have in place to ensure those risks are not realized (some people use a tool called FMEA - Failure Mode and Effect Analysis). Once you are convinced those systems are robust then document them.
__________________
Rgds, Paul Simpson

Looking for Solutions, Reclaiming the "Q" word
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Software Quality Assurance

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Agile Software Development - The Manifesto for Agile Software Development M Greenaway Software Quality Assurance 11 8th January 2009 11:41 AM
Control Of Production and Service Provision - Onsite /offshore design and development AS_QualityEngineer Design and Development - Process and Product 2 3rd January 2007 08:15 AM
Supplier Development - Cited for 'no evidence of subcontractor development' barbt Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7 11th February 2005 08:51 AM
Software Development Plan - Startup Software Development Company - 13485:2003 guzzi ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 2 6th May 2004 11:48 AM
Manufacturers, Distributors and QMS development Dave Johnson ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2 16th July 2003 11:07 AM



The time now is 07:58 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts