|
|
 |

27th April 2000, 12:20 AM
|
 |
Aussie Bloke
Registration Date: Nov 1999
Location: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 495
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 51 Karma: 84 
|
|
Which Quality Approach - Standards, Six Sigma, zero defect, Continuous improvement
How many different quality approaches are there, and what are there names?
Could members please consider this question and add to the list.
To start with, lets say:
1. "The Standards Approach" (ISO/QS/TL/AS/etc)
2. "Regulatory", as in drugs, medicines, foodstuffs, etc.
3. TQM
Then all the other bits like 5S, zero defect, Continuous improvement (and however many variations there are on that theme), Kaisen, Deming approach, ???????????
I suppose the additional question is, which are approaches and which are merely tools?
------------------
|

27th April 2000, 01:46 PM
|
 |
dWizard
Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 475
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 63
|
|
Quote:
|
…which are approaches and which are merely tools?
|
An argument could be made that all are tools. Even TQM, in and of itself is just a collection of different tools coupled with a philosophy.
Some would also argue that the regulatory item is not quality at all. Having dealt with the FDA end of it, I would tend to agree, in part. The QSR, just as ISO 900x, does not guarantee quality of product, just that the system be documented. However, the FDA inspections take differing approaches to inspections.
I guess whether the items in question differ between a tool and an approach depends on how the organization in question implements them.
Regards,
Don
|

27th April 2000, 11:32 PM
|
 |
Aussie Bloke
Registration Date: Nov 1999
Location: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 495
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 51 Karma: 84 
|
|
Thanks Don, I even went to your web site before asking the original question, just to see if there were any readily apparent answers there. (given the Wiz that you are)
What I'm after is a list of quality philsophies that can be applied.
What I'd like to do is to be armed with a quiver of the sum total of quality philosophies that can then be thrown on the table and individual organisations cn be shown how these could work for them, and which one will give them the results they are after, considering cost, time, customer requirements, company culture, etc.
I'm not a consultant. I am a keen quality practitioner who would like to go to a prospective employer with a well rounded understanding of models/practices/philosophies that can be used.
Does anyone have such a list that I can build on?
------------------
|

29th April 2000, 02:27 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
|
|
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48 Karma: 15 
|
|
|
Hello David
I like where you are coming from on this issue, and i have an idea where you are going.
For example, sometimes i am in a position where i can offer companies the choice between implementing ISO or the Business Excellence Model (Baldridge to you). I then explain how the different models can suit different organisations ie
BEM suits companies with a very open cultural environment where the management and staff are comfortable with soft issues like 360 Degree Appraisals etc.
ISO suits highly structured (probably manufacturing environments) where the staff are more comfortable with clear defined guidelines.
Let me know if you want any further cooperation.
------------------
Andy B
|

30th January 2005, 09:46 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Any contemporary comments / opinions?
|

31st January 2005, 02:10 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
|
|
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Karma Power: 213
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Marc
Any contemporary comments / opinions?
|
Well.. Perhaps that there are very few genuinely new things under the sun. New names and buzz-words, yes, but the basic tools and approaches seem to remain the same.
/Claes
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|