|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

8th September 2005, 10:50 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern Indiana, U.S.A.
|
|
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 38 Karma: 10 
|
|
Reject Rates - Lots and split lots
Good Morning Everyone,
I'm a manufacturing engineer for a small company that doesn't have a formal quality system in-place (owner's decision). We do have an individual that inspects items upon receipt that are fabricated to our drawings.
For the most part, the lots are accepted/rejected base on the results of sample inspections (he uses the tables in M-S-105).
Typically, our reciepts (lots) are either accepted or rejected based on the sample results. We then report supplier preformance based on lots accepted.
Example - 10 lots inspected, 9 accepted equals a 90% acceptance rate.
Occasionally when we really need an item, he inspects the entire lot, sorting out the good & bad, and making it a split lot.
MY QUESTION(s) - What is the appropriate method to report on lots that have been split (or) is there another approach we should take on reporting vendor performance based on the inspection method we use?
TIA,
Rudy
|

8th September 2005, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 62
|
|
Posts: 3,547
Thanks Given to Others: 71
Thanked 717 Times in 442 Posts
Karma Power: 413
|
|
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by RudyB
Good Morning Everyone,
I'm a manufacturing engineer for a small company that doesn't have a formal quality system in-place (owner's decision). We do have an individual that inspects items upon receipt that are fabricated to our drawings.
For the most part, the lots are accepted/rejected base on the results of sample inspections (he uses the tables in M-S-105).
Typically, our reciepts (lots) are either accepted or rejected based on the sample results. We then report supplier preformance based on lots accepted.
Example - 10 lots inspected, 9 accepted equals a 90% acceptance rate.
Occasionally when we really need an item, he inspects the entire lot, sorting out the good & bad, and making it a split lot.
MY QUESTION(s) - What is the appropriate method to report on lots that have been split (or) is there another approach we should take on reporting vendor performance based on the inspection method we use?
TIA,
Rudy
|
Hi Rudy, welcome to the cove. I believe that the lot fails even if you sort.
If you have lot sizes that vary, you can use the total no. of items to determine % accepted(rejected).
(Total items in all passing lots/Total no of items in all lots)*100 = % Accepted
__________________
Al
|

8th September 2005, 11:27 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: North of Chicago,Illinois, USA
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,171
Thanks Given to Others: 472
Thanked 386 Times in 277 Posts
Karma Power: 280
|
|
|
Hi Rudy,
Look at it this way...why did you sort? Because it was rejected on initial inspection.
I track first piece approval through my manufacturing process. If my inspector has an out of tolerance condition, it is still considered a reject, even if engineering approved it "as is".
Hope this helps a bit.
__________________
CarolX
Theater is life, film is art, and television is furniture.
|

8th September 2005, 11:40 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
|
Posts: 13,330
Thanks Given to Others: 1,779
Thanked 5,346 Times in 3,428 Posts
Karma Power: 1445
|
|
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by Al Rosen
Hi Rudy, welcome to the cove. I believe that the lot fails even if you sort.
|
Yes--even if a lot is sorted, if it's lots-accepted-or-rejected that is being counted, then the lot that gets sorted has to be counted among the rejected lots.
Quote:
|
In Reply to Parent Post by Al Rosen
If you have lot sizes that vary, you can use the total no. of items to determine % accepted(rejected).
(Total items in all passing lots/Total no of items in all lots)*100 = % Accepted
|
This could be misleading unless 100% inspection is being done, because it's possible that there are defectives in the lots that "pass." It works as a measure of how many lots pass, of course, but I think it would be better to compare the number of pieces received vs. number nonconforming, regardless of whether the defectives are found in receiving inspection, production, or customer returns.
__________________
We aim to please. You aim too, please.
Last edited by Jim Wynne; 9th September 2005 at 08:55 AM.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|