The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Process


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
View Poll Results: How does your company structure management reviews of the quality system?
• Reviews are held on an organizational level (e.g., each VP runs his/her own management review) 18 7.96%
• Reviews are held at a site level, with each site containing multiple organizational entities 19 8.41%
• Reviews are held at a site level, with each site being a standalone entity 35 15.49%
• My company is small enough that we only run one management review for the entire company 154 68.14%
Voters: 226. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th September 2005, 01:32 PM
lance lance is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas
 
Posts: 6
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
lance has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Management Review of the QMS (Quality Management System) - How structured

How does your company structure management reviews of the quality system?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 9th September 2005, 01:56 PM
ralphsulser's Avatar
ralphsulser ralphsulser is offline
Quality Team

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Carolina
Age: 66
 
Posts: 1,474
Thanks Given to Others: 87
Thanked 159 Times in 114 Posts
Karma Power: 127
Karma: 3387
ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.ralphsulser is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

We are part of a world wide corporation with plants in every area. Each plant is a stand alone entity for P&L. We complete management reviews for our operating facility only. Some share sales offices depending on location, and we all share corporate inputs.
__________________
"Nothing is constant except change"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 12th September 2005, 09:15 AM
Don Palmer's Avatar
Don Palmer Don Palmer is offline
Elsmar Cove Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Region USA
Age: 60
 
Posts: 341
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 46
Karma: 1086
Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Don Palmer is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

I voted, "My company is small enough that we only run one management review for the entire company."Although, we have four facilities (all within a fifty mile radius) and upwards of nearly 300 personnel.

We have at least several management reviews a year, and sometimes more as determined by top management.
__________________
Statler: You're allowed to say 'h*ll' on this?
Waldorf: H*ll, yeah! It's the Internet!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th September 2005, 08:35 AM
Rob Nix's Avatar
Rob Nix Rob Nix is offline
qualitas ad nauseam

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saginaw, Michigan
Age: 50
 
Posts: 653
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 34 Times in 15 Posts
Karma Power: 79
Karma: 2016
Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Rob Nix is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

My current experience is almost identical to Muleskinner's. A fourth facility is being built and we have a similar number of employees. However, we have just one formal QMS Review a year. We also have quarterly top management meetings where QMS related issues are followed up. Das ist alles.
__________________
Rob - The sum of anecdotes is not data. -Roger Brinner
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th September 2005, 12:45 PM
Crusader's Avatar
Crusader Crusader is offline
$ Contributor

Registration Date: Oct 2002
Location: Torrance, California
 
Posts: 563
Thanks Given to Others: 68
Thanked 56 Times in 40 Posts
Karma Power: 74
Karma: 1724
Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Crusader is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

I am lucky to get everyone to sit down for a QMS MR meeting at all. Still, they fidget. I think that they don't see a benefit - so we must be doing something wrong. I see a benefit...it's called communication and the output is beneficial in my eyes. We were holding these meetings 2x/year.

We are implementing ISO 9001, our pre-audit is next week, and we have switched to a 1x/year meeting as a trial. The registration audit is Oct 24-28 for the main facilities (certified QS since Nov 1998) and a separate audit Nov 9-11 for a facility(sister company) that is 2 hours away and that has never been certified to anything. Oh my....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th September 2005, 05:00 PM
rafrost's Avatar
rafrost rafrost is offline
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)

Registration Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chicago suburbs
 
Posts: 6
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 39
Karma: 10
rafrost has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee

I am lucky to get everyone to sit down for a QMS MR meeting at all. Still, they fidget. I think that they don't see a benefit - so we must be doing something wrong. I see a benefit...it's called communication and the output is beneficial in my eyes. We were holding these meetings 2x/year.

We are implementing ISO 9001, our pre-audit is next week, and we have switched to a 1x/year meeting as a trial. The registration audit is Oct 24-28 for the main facilities (certified QS since Nov 1998) and a separate audit Nov 9-11 for a facility(sister company) that is 2 hours away and that has never been certified to anything. Oh my....
I don't know about yours, but my external auditor requires a minimum of 2 Management Reviews per year. And we are increasing it to try to add more value. Too many dropped balls with 2 per year.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th September 2005, 04:11 AM
Shaun Daly's Avatar
Shaun Daly Shaun Daly is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Feb 2003
Location: England
Age: 43
 
Posts: 94
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 152
Shaun Daly is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Shaun Daly is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default

We used to do 1 annual MR, and then added 4 quarterly meetings where much of the same topics were covered.

So we then renamed the quarterly meetings to MR's, added any mandatory bits of MR that were not already checked and dumped the annual one.
__________________
Im not really insane, its just the job......
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th September 2005, 03:55 PM
michelle8075's Avatar
michelle8075 michelle8075 is offline
Trying to learn!

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Great Lake State - MI
Age: 31
 
Posts: 153
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 222
michelle8075 is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.michelle8075 is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.michelle8075 is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default

We found that we don't need a single "Management Review Meeting". What we did find was that we already had several other meetings we conducted weekly or bi-monthly, or monthly that addressed all the issues of review and at the appropriate levels. We continuously do Management Review around here. My meetings include Project Status Meeting, Business Planning Meeting, Executive Meeting, Safety Meeting, and Steering Committee Meeting.

Sure, it is just easier to have one meeting once of twice a year, but our in our company we constantly look over everything in these other meetings as part of our normal business practices.
__________________
Be like "Nike" and JUST DO IT!
Michelle
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Process

Bookmarks

Tags
management review, qms (quality management system)


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ERP/MRP system as part of the QMS (Quality Management System) Red Bead ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 24 1st October 2009 10:49 AM
Management Review of the QMS (Quality Management System) - How often (Frequency) tschones Management Review Process 90 1st July 2008 11:01 AM
Merging EMS (Environmental Management System) with QMS (Quality Management System)? jmp4429 ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 9 15th April 2005 07:50 AM
What is a Quality Management System (QMS)? Greg B Registered Visitor Articles Archive 8 13th June 2004 09:36 PM
Quality Management System (QMS) 4.1, a and b dbulak ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 2 5th December 2001 06:54 AM



The time now is 12:50 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts