|
|

14th September 2005, 12:07 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: canada
|
|
Posts: 43
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 22 Karma: 130  
|
|
Next Revisions to ISO 9001 - 2008 Addendum - 2010 Revision
Preliminary information I received from a member of the TC 176 committee this morning:
2005 - there will be an addendum to ISO 9001:2000 brought out that will more clearly define much of the terminology in the standard.
2008- another addendum
2010 - next revision to the standard ISO 9001:2010, although there continues to be much discussion on this.
|
|
Thank You to piney for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

14th September 2005, 12:39 PM
|
|
Been around a while
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southeastern USA
|
|
Posts: 1,995
Thanks Given to Others: 281
Thanked 266 Times in 211 Posts
Karma Power: 171
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by piney
Preliminary information I received from a member of the TC 176 committee this morning:
2005 - there will be an addendum to ISO 9001:2000 brought out that will more clearly define much of the terminology in the standard.
2008- another addendum
2010 - next revision to the standard ISO 9001:2010, although there continues to be much discussion on this.
|
Piney:
Did this TC 176 member give you any idea if there are any other issues covered in the 2005 addendum? For instance, is the customer satisfaction monitoring requirement going to be clarified (8.2.1)?
|

14th September 2005, 12:44 PM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jul 2004
Location: WI/USA
|
|
Posts: 399
Thanks Given to Others: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 42
|
|
I believe Jack West is giving an update to the TC 176 work at the Outlook on Quality Systems conference on October 3-4 in Miami.
Let's hope the hurricanes are all done battering the coast by that time!
__________________
If at first you don't succeed, go shopping.........
|

14th September 2005, 01:19 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: canada
|
|
Posts: 43
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 22 Karma: 130  
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Craig H.
Piney:
Did this TC 176 member give you any idea if there are any other issues covered in the 2005 addendum? For instance, is the customer satisfaction monitoring requirement going to be clarified (8.2.1)?
|
I will continue to plug him for information  TC 176 meets next month in Panama.
I can tell you that after a 10 minute conversation with him, my outlook and enthusiasm for quality and quality management systems have been completely revitalized! The next five years are going to be extremely interesting!
A few of the things that the committee is looking at include: a quality system introduced by Atomic Energy of Canada that incorporates quality, safety, and environment all in one standard, and a registered standard (currently 35 companies registered to) in Britain that focuses entirely on employee competence, awareness, and training.
|

14th September 2005, 01:34 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

15th September 2005, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Dirk
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: California, USA
|
|
Posts: 821
Thanks Given to Others: 233
Thanked 135 Times in 100 Posts
Karma Power: 99 Karma: 3065 

|
|
Hello All:
The following is my understanding....
I believe Piney has combined information on ISO 9000:2000, ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000.
ISO 9000:200X is already at the FDIS (Final Draft Interantional Standard) stage. This means that ISO 9000:200X could be published as an International Standard by the end of 2005.
The plan is to Amend ISO 9001:2000 and to Revise ISO 9004:2000. Amend means to clarify content to improve useability of the standard. There should be no changes to requirements. Revise means to clarify and to change requirmeents. Keep in mind that ISO 9004 is a non-normative standard. There really are no requirements within ISO 9004 from a certification standpoint. There are requiremtns within ISO 9004 if an organization chooses to implement it for improvement purposes.
Both the amendment to ISO 9001 and the revision to ISO 9004 are expected to be completed by 2008 based on how long the amendment / revision process has taken in the past. If there are lots of arguemnts and disagreement amongst member bodies, it may take even longer.
Regards, Dirk
|

29th September 2005, 08:49 AM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: usa
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 195
Thanks Given to Others: 54
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 41 Karma: 20 
|
|
Information
Just out of curiosity, where do you go to get this information. Does ISO put this out for all who visit their web-site?
|

30th September 2005, 03:34 PM
|
 |
Dirk
Registration Date: Jun 2004
Location: California, USA
|
|
Posts: 821
Thanks Given to Others: 233
Thanked 135 Times in 100 Posts
Karma Power: 99 Karma: 3065 

|
|
Hello Dbulak:
I got my information by joining the US Technical Advisory Group to ISO/Technical Committe 176; the US TAG.
http://www.tc176.org/
Regards, Dirk
|
|
Thanks to vanputten for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|