|
|
 |
|

8th August 2000, 11:19 AM
|
|
|
Learning about what's involved in the Ford Q1 award and QOS - Seeking Information
I'm interested in learning about what's involved in the Ford Q1 award.
Can anybody recommend any decent reading materials or web links??
TIA
|

8th August 2000, 05:50 PM
|
 |
In search of the 6P's
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 388
Thanks Given to Others: 27
Thanked 35 Times in 28 Posts
Karma Power: 55
|
|
Hello - I am looking into this to see if I can help you out. My initial finding is that Ford does no longer rely on Q1. They have adopted QS9000 and "most" companies find that Ford likes this. I am not sure about this at this point but I will try and find out more. I work at a Heat Treating Comapny and we just went through a Ford Heat Treaters Audit. It was part of the Q1 process but just limited to Heat Treaters. I will get back to you.
|

9th August 2000, 07:13 AM
|
|
|
I may be wrong, but I understood that Q1 is in addition to QS9000, i.e. QS9000 is a pre-requisite plus evidence of QOS methodology & some other requirements.
It's the additions to QS that I'm interested in learning more about.
Thanks,
Don
|

9th August 2000, 07:46 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
In the QS implementations I have done in the past, the QS requirements completely fulfilled the Q1 requirements (nothing else was needed).
|

9th August 2000, 08:38 AM
|
|
|
Thanks Marc,
My interest stemmed from a Ford diagram that a colleague showed me. It shows a "hierarchy of excellence" with Q1 sitting above QS9000. The main differences appear to be something to do with the performance metrics from QOS, Customer endorsements plus a Materials Management System (MS9000) which is in addition to QS element 4.15
Can anybody enlighten me further, or am I looking at something that's already been outdated?
|

9th August 2000, 11:29 AM
|
 |
In search of the 6P's
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Michigan, USA
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 388
Thanks Given to Others: 27
Thanked 35 Times in 28 Posts
Karma Power: 55
|
|
Sorry - I had some bad information. I did some looking and your right. There are at least four requirements a company has to achieve before being considered for Q1. You should be able to access a old forum for Ford-Q1 and the first posting talks about the requirements. It sounds like all four would be required but two of them are really one - ISO and QS. If you get QS certified then you are compliant to ISO depending on the scope of your company.
|

10th August 2000, 07:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Don,
We are currently working towards Q1 and I have before me the requirements. They are;
Third party registration to QS9000
All elements of QOS have been met
Must have a current 12 month shipping history to Ford
MS9000 self assessment score of not less than 100.
In addition to the above there are some performancre metrics that have to be met, namely;
Zero field actions in the last 12 months
Zero launch QR's in the last 12 months
Zero PSW slippage in the last 12 months
PPM competitive (?) and improving
Does this help?
[This message has been edited by Don Reid (edited 10 August 2000).]
|

10th August 2000, 08:16 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
|
|
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48 Karma: 15 
|
|
|
Just educate me a little Don
What is MS 9000, and what exactly are these.
Zero field actions in the last 12 months
Zero launch QR's in the last 12 months
Zero PSW slippage in the last 12 months
Regards
------------------
Andy B
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|