The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th October 2000, 05:04 PM
PaulSteed
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Please Help! Trying to set up a serious PPM system - Parts per Million

We are trying to set up a serious PPM system to control the quality of our suppliers. there seem to be various definitions of 'the number of opportunities for error'. Does anyone know of a standard definition that all our suppliers can recognise. eg a hole can be wrong place, wrong diameter, wrong depth, wrong finish, out of circular, out of perpendicular, wrong bottom profile etc etc. This mus be laid down somewhere??

Help please.

Thanks

Paul Steed
qualityclinics.com
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 25th October 2000, 10:09 PM
CJacobsen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Look!

Looking into the outlines for training I have given in the past, I have given the following for a definition of Parts Per Million or PPM:
One nonconforming (or defective) item in a collection of 1 million items is called one part per million. A nonconforming or defective item is classified this way after the first anomoly that causes the item to be out of acceptable limits/tolerances.

So based on your question, if a part has 7 defects, any one of them alone causes the part to be defective - all seven would tell you that there is not one root cause but probably many you would need to go after in order to reduce the rate. There is no absolute scale by which a component/parts
quality can be evaluated. The quality levels required depend on the complexity of the systems built from the components/parts. Although your part has seven identifiable defects, the first one found caused it to be
classified as defective or nonconforming. The rest of the defects found, although indicative of a larger problem in any given process, do not count when you are calculating ppm since you are looking at more than one part produced and the production rate of conforming parts. If you are looking
for defect rate regardless of number of parts or number of defects found on a single part, this would change. Now the 1 million parts would be counted by adding up all the possible defects for a single part then dividing 1 million by that number to determine how many parts it would take if all
defects were found in every part to reach a million. That number of parts would constitue the total number needed and each would be inspected for each defect. Now you are looking at ppm but for defect found and not part produced.

As far as documenting these values - the number of defects allowed for 1 million parts produced or the total number of defects found in a sample group that would represent 1 million defects if all are found - yes. How
would people know what the goals are or if they are achieving those goals if
they are not published/documented somewhere. This would be part of a continuous improvement program.

Hope this helps you out.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
PPM and not a million parts eypon SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 10 23rd July 2009 09:54 PM
DPMO and PPM - Differences - Defects Per Million Opportunities and Parts Per Million? jackylpt Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 5 11th February 2009 01:51 PM
PPM (Parts Per Million) Measurements - Parts vs. Opportunities ckochen SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 4 22nd October 2007 11:35 PM
Formula for the Calculation of PPM (Parts Per Million) Mumus SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 5 5th September 2007 04:23 PM
What PPM (Parts Per Million) targets do you use internally? Jojogo Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 9 1st May 2007 06:24 PM



The time now is 05:30 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts