


13th October 2005, 10:30 AM


What does the P/t ratio (Precision/Tolerance) =RR/(USLLSL) say about my gage study?
Can somone explain to me what the P/t ratio (Precision/Tolerance) =RR/(USLLSL) tells me about my gage study? Is there some magic number that needs to be met?
Thanks,
Rich DeRoeck

13th October 2005, 10:39 AM


Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by rderoeck
Can somone explain to me what the P/t ratio (Precision/Tolerance) =RR/(USLLSL) tells me about my gage study? Is there some magic number that needs to be met?
Thanks,
Rich DeRoeck

Welcome to the Cove
The precision/tolerance ration is a measure of how much of the tolerance is being consumed by gage error. The generally accepted goal is 0.1 or less (10%). Here's a basic explanation (scroll down):
http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/glossary.htm#P

Thanks to Jim Wynne for your informative Post and/or Attachment!


13th October 2005, 12:16 PM


So......this is diferent than the % R&R requirement of <10%. Do I have this right?
Rich

13th October 2005, 12:30 PM


Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by rderoeck
So......this is diferent than the % R&R requirement of <10%. Do I have this right?
Rich

Well, more precisely, it's a different way of looking at it that takes the 3sigma magnitude of R&R into consideration.

13th October 2005, 01:35 PM


There are an increasing number of ways to evaluate a measurement system, and each of these is intended to answer a different question about the suitability of the system.
If your question is "Is this gauge adequate to inspect a part to this tolerance?", then P/T ratio (known as % R&R before the proliferation of indicators) answers this question. The typical standard for P/T ratio is 10% or less is ideal, between 10% to 30% may be acceptable depending on the importance of the measurement, the cost of new gauging, etc., and > 30% is not acceptable.
If your question is "Is this gauge adequate to inspect a part as part of study (e.g., Six Sigma, DOE, capability, etc.)?", then %TV (Total Variation) answers this question. The standard is the same as above. In addition, the Number of Destinct Categories is used. An ndc >/= 5 is good, between 2 & 5 may be acceptable, and < 2 is unacceptable. Wheeler uses a Discrimination Ratio, which must be >/= 4, and requires the gauge resolution to be < the StdDev of PV (Part Variation).
If you want to know where the variation is coming from, % Contribution of each component answers this question.
See AIAG's MSA manual and/or Wheeler's "Evaluating the Measurement Process" for more information.

Thanks to Miner for your informative Post and/or Attachment!


13th October 2005, 02:49 PM


Here's my issue....
Someone showed me a GRR study using JMP software. It printed out the following summary:
10.3334 % Gage R&R=100*(RR/TV)
0.16857 Precision/Tolerance Ratio=RR/(USLLSL)
So the first one is comparing the percentage of measurement variance to process variance (as determined by the study data) while the second one is comparing the proportion of measurement error to the part tolerance.
Can you then say that the percentage of P/t is 16.857%?
Thanks a lot,
Rich DeRoeck
Supplier Quality Engineer/SPC Coordinator
Calibration Manager

13th October 2005, 03:08 PM


Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by rderoeck
Someone showed me a GRR study using JMP software. It printed out the following summary:
10.3334 % Gage R&R=100*(RR/TV)
0.16857 Precision/Tolerance Ratio=RR/(USLLSL)
So the first one is comparing the percentage of measurement variance to process variance (as determined by the study data) while the second one is comparing the proportion of measurement error to the part tolerance.
Can you then say that the percentage of P/t is 16.857%?

Yes. P/T = 16.857 %, which compares the gauge error to tolerance. This falls into the marginal are, but if it is not a critical dimension, it is probably acceptable.
The 10.3334% GRR % TV (Total variation) means the gauge is acceptable for performing process studies, such as DOE or capability studies.

4th December 2012, 02:42 AM


Re: What does the P/t ratio (Precision/Tolerance) =RR/(USLLSL) say about my gage stu
About P/T ratio there are two way to control it:
6sigma/USLLSL*100% OR 3sigma/Tolerance
For the tolerance what kind of number should I put?
ppl told me to use "80% average" be the Tolerance. Is that correct?

Lower Navigation Bar


Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)


Thread Tools 
Search this Thread 


Display Modes 
Rate Thread Content 
Linear Mode


Forum Posting Settings

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off



Similar Discussion Threads

Discussion Thread Title 
Thread Starter 
Forum 
Replies 
Last Post or Poll Vote 
Computing six sigma when the USL & LSL are varying

patkim 
Six Sigma 
16 
8th June 2009 08:09 PM 
Doublesided (USL, LSL) Variables sampling plan Z1.9  Use in Excel spreadsheet?

tdickson 
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 
2 
7th June 2009 12:08 PM 
P/T (Precision/Tolerance) ratio for offcenter processes? Process capability ratio?

Strife 
Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 
3 
24th June 2007 06:46 PM 
Precision/Tolerance Ratio for 1sided Specification  How to Compute

argon  2006 
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 
3 
9th October 2005 10:25 PM 
Cp, Cpk calculation for np chart  No USL or LSL  SMT Production

rikkyyee 
Capability, Accuracy and Stability  Processes, Machines, etc. 
16 
7th August 2002 11:36 AM 

