The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis > Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools / Solutions > Using Minitab Software


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21st November 2005, 04:07 PM
VMax!'s Avatar
VMax! VMax! is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dunn, North Carolina
 
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 10
VMax! has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! MINITAB and non-normal unilateral tolerance data - Cannot confirm Ppk values

Hi folks! First time poster here.

One of our suppliers recently FAXed over some parallelism data (using DataMyte/Quantum SPC). I manually copied the raw data over into MINITAB (our software package) and found (not surprisingly) the data is not normal (A^2 = 6.95, N=0.000). I was taught that if the data was not normal I should not do any further statistical analysis.

I have no reason to believe their Quantum data is invalid, but I cannot confirm their Ppk values using MINITAB. What to do?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Kevin
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 21st November 2005, 04:21 PM
Miner's Avatar
Miner Miner is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
 
Posts: 1,840
Thanks Given to Others: 166
Thanked 670 Times in 457 Posts
Blog Entries: 9
Karma Power: 251
Karma: 9207
Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VMax!

Hi folks! First time poster here.

One of our suppliers recently FAXed over some parallelism data (using DataMyte/Quantum SPC). I manually copied the raw data over into MINITAB (our software package) and found (not surprisingly) the data is not normal (A^2 = 6.95, N=0.000). I was taught that if the data was not normal I should not do any further statistical analysis.

I have no reason to believe their Quantum data is invalid, but I cannot confirm their Ppk values using MINITAB. What to do?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Kevin
The old "If the data are not normal..." is not valid. However, you do have to be careful to use the correct statistical techniques.

Minitab has an option to analyze non-normal data either by distribution fitting or by data transforms (to normalize the dats). Note: it is perfectly "Normal" for parallelism data to be non-normal. You are dealing with what is called a "Boundary" condition (i.e., you cannot go below zero). Minitab can hadle this also. Enter 0 as the lower spec and check the Boundary box.
__________________
"A fool can learn from his own experiences; the wise learn from the experience of others." - Democritus, 460-370 B.C.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 21st November 2005, 04:47 PM
pabloquintana's Avatar
pabloquintana pabloquintana is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honduras
 
Posts: 42
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 20
pabloquintana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
BIG Smile

Man, first you can try to identify which distribution fits best using Quality Tools/Individual Distribution Identification.

After that you can use the Non-Normal Capability analysis selecting the distribution you've found in the previous step.

Also you can use a Box Cox transformation in Normal Capability and using 0 as the lower spec and checking Boundary.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22nd November 2005, 10:21 AM
VMax!'s Avatar
VMax! VMax! is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dunn, North Carolina
 
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 10
VMax! has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Regarding 'boundary' you both are correct. I checked the box and re-ran MINITAB and I now agree with my supplier's Ppk. Thanks guys.

Regarding 'normality' I am still, well, unsure. In this instance I understand parallelism is a unilateral tolerance (can't be less than zero). So...

1. Should I just 'accept' the fact that the data is non-normal and predict Ppk?

2. Are there other MINTAB functions that I can apply to a given set of 'non-normal' data?

My first inclination when viewing the data was, 'ah, they're cherry-picking their points.' All opinions, URL's, enlightenment, or gifts of money would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd November 2005, 10:28 AM
pabloquintana's Avatar
pabloquintana pabloquintana is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honduras
 
Posts: 42
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 20
pabloquintana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Laughing

Quote:
Originally Posted by VMax!

1. Should I just 'accept' the fact that the data is non-normal and predict Ppk?

2. Are there other MINTAB functions that I can apply to a given set of 'non-normal' data?
VMax, you can't apply regular capability analysis to non-normal data. You will have to transform it with Box Cox or identify which distribution matches best to then use the Quality Tools/Non-Normal Capability Analysis of MINITAB.

If you use regular capability analysis to non-normal data you'll get the wrong information.

I will recommend www.isixsigma.com forums for these topics. Do a search or ask there and you'll get a ton of replies in minutes.

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22nd November 2005, 10:38 AM
Darius's Avatar
Darius Darius is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Monterrey Mexico
Age: 47
 
Posts: 338
Thanks Given to Others: 21
Thanked 84 Times in 59 Posts
Karma Power: 65
Karma: 1399
Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Darius is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Default

Many software including MINITAB obtain the ppk no matter if "is normal" or not.

The first step to compare results, check if MINITAB obtain the same value without any transformation (I am pretty sure that the results will be equal), and if not is equal, try first to see if changing options in the configuration screens make them equal (A friend of my obtained two different values in 2 differents reports of MINITAB and checking the options changed both to the same value).

Do not use a lower spec of 0 if is not the case, the indicators like ppk take in account that the target is centered on the specs.

Agree that a transformation (and I really like Box Cox) could transform your distribution an the value obtained will represent with more reality the data but as I think "If you are going to jump into a pool is better to try to see the bottom of the pool before jumping than not doing it because you have no rule to measure it.". An Indicator by it self is better than none.

note: if you are going to transform the data, you will have to transform the specs also.
__________________
Vits er thorf, theim vitha ratar; daelt er heima hvat; at augabragthi verthr, sá er ekki kann ok med snotrom sitr.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22nd November 2005, 10:55 AM
pabloquintana's Avatar
pabloquintana pabloquintana is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honduras
 
Posts: 42
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 20
pabloquintana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Screw

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darius

1. Many software including MINITAB obtain the ppk no matter if "is normal" or not.

2. Do not use a lower spec of 0 if is not the case, the indicators like ppk take in account that the target is centered on the specs.

3. note: if you are going to transform the data, you will have to transform the specs also.
Darius,

I will comment what you've just said.

1. Yes, MINITAB will output a Ppk result no matter what distribution you input but YOU WILL GET THE WRONG INFO!

2. He said that he is using a set of data from a parallelism test. That will have a boundary of 0.

3. The specs will be automatically transformed by MINITAB. Maybe you meant that the result will show transformed specs, but you will be looking at the Ppk values only.

Regards.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th November 2005, 10:13 PM
KenK KenK is offline
KenK Number 2

Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: N.E. IL, USA
 
Posts: 42
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 39
Karma: 271
KenK is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.KenK is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.KenK is appreciated, and has over 200 Karma points.
Default

A few additional thoughts:

1. Make sure you are using the latest version of MINITAB, which is MINITAB 14.20. Release 14 has a much much more powerful set of non-normal tools than earlier versions, such as release 13.

2. The capability tools do handle one-sided distributions. Just leave the non-applicable spec limit blank. Only check the boundary checkbox if it is physically impossible for a value to fall below or above the boundary. The boundary checkbox is used when the PPM values are calculated, excluding the distribution on the other side of the boundary from PPM calculations.

3. As mentioned several times before, make sure you use the Individual Distribution Identification tool to find the distribution that fits your data best. If that doesn't work well, try the Johnson Transformation option inside the Nonnormal Capability tools.

4. Don't forget that MINITAB users can always call Minitab Technical Support. Except for the cost of the call, it is free to all users. For the number go to Help > About MINITAB and find the Contact Us button. They are very helpful.
__________________
Ken K.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis > Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools / Solutions > Using Minitab Software

Bookmarks

Tags
minitab, unilateral tolerance


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calculating Ppk on a single sided (unilateral) tolerance Lightning546 Student Research Questions - Any Educational Institution 16 2nd November 2009 06:04 PM
Is the normal Cpk calculation applicable for data with positive & negative values? Anonaman Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 4 11th August 2009 08:54 AM
Analysis of non-normal stratified data for cpk/ppk? Rupture test nwillnow Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 6 28th June 2006 01:34 PM
Johnson's Transformation - Minitab 14 - How can I find out Ppk - Non-normal Distribu? Deanmi Using Minitab Software 9 8th May 2006 01:02 AM
Ppk and Pp on unilateral or unequal tolerance - DCx says Pp can not be calculated qualitytrec Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 19 9th September 2004 10:19 PM



The time now is 10:46 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts