The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Elsmar Cove Forum Community Discussions > The News > Automotive News


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st January 2006, 01:49 PM
Ken K's Avatar
Ken K Ken K is offline
!

Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: USA
Age: 56
 
Posts: 406
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 57
Karma: 515
Ken K is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Ken K is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Ken K is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Ken K is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Ken K is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Ken K is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
I Say... Lear Pays the Price - Loses Chrysler group business

The message seems loud and clear...

Quote:
Lear left reeling from Dodge Ram snub

David Barkholz
Robert Sherefkin
Automotive News / January 30, 2006 - 6:00 am

DETROIT -- Lear Corp.'s recent pricing dispute with the Chrysler group has cost the seat supplier a share of one of the industry's most-anticipated new-vehicle programs.

Just weeks after Chrysler went to court to force Lear to continue shipping parts, the automaker replaced Lear as a supplier of seats and interiors for the next-generation Dodge Ram pickup.

Johnson Controls Inc. will supply seats and Visteon Corp. will supply door trim and cockpits for the new Ram, which will go into production in 2008.

The loss of the next-generation Ram interior -- said to be worth an estimated $400 million a year -- is a serious blow to Lear. Like many other U.S. suppliers, the Southfield, Mich., seat maker has been hammered by Big 3 production cuts and rising raw material costs.

Last week, Lear posted a fourth-quarter net loss of $596.6 million, including one-time charges of $423.7 million before taxes. Lear has announced plans to close or consolidate 20 plants and wants to spin off its unprofitable interiors business.

'We're not vindictive'
Chrysler group spokesman Jason Vines denied any connection between the Ram contract and last year's pricing dispute with Lear.

"We're not vindictive," he said. "They bid on it, but they lost out because they didn't have the right product, the right quality and the right cost. Theirs wasn't the best bid, and we went with the best."

In an interview last week with Automotive News, Lear CEO Bob Rossiter said he accepts Chrysler's version of events. But an industry consultant familiar with the project said Chrysler made an example of Lear. The contract, the source said, was Lear's to lose.

The pricing dispute flared up last year after several Lear suppliers threatened to halt parts shipments unless they received immediate price increases to offset increases in raw material costs. Lear asked the Chrysler group to share the burden, and Chrysler sued Lear on Dec. 2 to ensure an uninterrupted delivery of parts.

The companies settled last week without disclosing terms, but the damage had been done. Chrysler selected Johnson Controls to produce seats for the next-generation Ram and Visteon to supply the door trim and cockpits.

The Ram contract is coveted by suppliers. Last year, the Chrysler group sold 400,543 Ram pickups. In a crowded U.S. market, only three light-vehicle nameplates did better in 2005: the Ford F series, Chevrolet Silverado and Toyota Camry.

Rossiter was scheduled to meet with Chrysler group CEO Tom LaSorda this week to patch up relations. Rossiter said Lear still may be able to supply some parts for the future Ram to Johnson Controls and Visteon.

It is unusual -- but not unprecedented -- for a major supplier to be ousted on a replacement vehicle, said Kevin Tynan, an analyst with Argus Research Group in New York. Typically, automakers want to use as many carryover parts as possible on a redesigned vehicle. That saves time, cost and quality while preserving continuity.

Terrible timing
The loss of the next-generation Ram pickup could weaken Lear's already troubled financial outlook. The company posted a $1.37 billion net loss for 2005, compared with a profit of $422 million the previous year. The results for 2005 included one-time charges of $1.24 billion before taxes.

Lear's dispute with Chrysler won't help. The Ram has been a marquee platform for Lear since 1994, and Chrysler has been a key customer. In 2004, DaimlerChrysler accounted for 12 percent of Lear's global sales.

Mostly on the strength of its sizable Big 3 business, Lear ranks No. 7 on the Automotive News list of the top 100 global suppliers with original-equipment automotive parts sales of $17.0 billion in 2004.

But Lear's rivals are gaining ground. In a speech on Aug. 3, Chrysler purchasing chief Peter Rosenfeld named Johnson Controls and Magna International Inc. as "high-performance suppliers," giving them a voice in the early stages of Chrysler's product development.

Then Rosenfeld named Johnson Controls and Magna as suppliers for an undisclosed crossover vehicle to be launched in 2008. Johnson Controls will make the seats, and Magna will supply the cockpit.

Rossiter acknowledged that Lear has suffered its share of reverses over the past year. "Everything that could go wrong, went wrong," he said. "But I think we can replace the (Ram) business in the long run, and we can straighten out our relationship with Chrysler."
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Elsmar Cove Forum Community Discussions > The News > Automotive News

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Specifications from OMG (Object Management Group) for Business Modeling Yarik Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0 27th June 2009 02:38 AM
What is the definition of a Customer? Are we responsible for Lear CSRs? Teresa1000 ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6 6th July 2006 01:18 PM
Layered Process Audit required by Chrysler - Is it as 'great' as Chrysler says it is? CINDY Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 28 22nd November 2005 10:15 AM
Lear US vs. Ford Europe bigkevin APQP and PPAP 2 15th September 2005 01:49 AM
Looking for Chrysler FPSC form per procedure PSSP0106 - From Chrysler 2001 PSO manual efletchermcd Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1 19th May 2005 03:08 PM



The time now is 04:36 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts