The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Process


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th February 2006, 04:26 PM
Sean Kelley's Avatar
Sean Kelley Sean Kelley is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Glasgow, KY
Age: 38
 
Posts: 117
Thanks Given to Others: 25
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 168
Sean Kelley is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Sean Kelley is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Please Help! Changes that affect the QMS in Management Review - Clause 5.6.2

Hello all,
I have been given a Scope for Improvement by our auditor to do more on the Management Review section 5.6.2 Review Input item f). It states that we must report on changes that could affect the QMS. I have always used the changes to procedures as a basis for this. He is telling me I should expand this and include other changes. An example that he quoted was that a QC engineer was promoted to a process engineer position. As a QC Engineer he did calibrations in the lab. He thinks this is a change worth noting in management review. I view it as a resource need to be filled by the next QC Engineer which they are looking for. I believe the calibrations could also be outsourced if deemed necessary even if only temporary. Also, the old QC engineer is still here so he could be asked to perform this task when it arises if need be. Any thoughts / suggestions on possible other changes that affect the QMS would be appeciated.
__________________
MILO2000
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 16th February 2006, 05:26 PM
Casana's Avatar
Casana Casana is offline
Blueberry Nut

Registration Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cranford, NJ
Age: 45
 
Posts: 82
Thanks Given to Others: 14
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 40
Karma: 53
Casana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

I think some examples of changes that would be worthy of noting during a Management Review:

a) reorganizations (e.g. department mergers)
b) relocation (of offices, manufacturing, warehouse, etc)
c) new business (e.g. if you're planning to enter a new market)
d) changes to current business (e.g. perhaps you're dropping a product line, outsourcing some work that used to be done in-house, etc.)
e) Major changes to the facility (e.g. new production line, building a new lab)
f) Major changes to your raw material supply that could have a ripple effect on your product (we are changing one supplier, is having a huge ripple effect accross our company)
g) Identifying need for new system (i.e. even though we weathered Katrina's impact ok, it motivated our mgt to do a comprehensive business continuity plan)

The point is that these types of changes also impact the quality system, even if they are not specifically related to "quality".
__________________
I've got a few blueberries left. That's a good metaphor for life... Dustin Hoffman
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 16th February 2006, 07:31 PM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN AndyN is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan, USA
 
Posts: 3,878
Thanks Given to Others: 1,783
Thanked 1,258 Times in 901 Posts
Karma Power: 297
Karma: 10025
AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.AndyN is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Thank You! Thanks for the valuable examples........

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casana

I think some examples of changes that would be worthy of noting during a Management Review:

a) reorganizations (e.g. department mergers)
b) relocation (of offices, manufacturing, warehouse, etc)
c) new business (e.g. if you're planning to enter a new market)
d) changes to current business (e.g. perhaps you're dropping a product line, outsourcing some work that used to be done in-house, etc.)
e) Major changes to the facility (e.g. new production line, building a new lab)
f) Major changes to your raw material supply that could have a ripple effect on your product (we are changing one supplier, is having a huge ripple effect accross our company)
g) Identifying need for new system (i.e. even though we weathered Katrina's impact ok, it motivated our mgt to do a comprehensive business continuity plan)

The point is that these types of changes also impact the quality system, even if they are not specifically related to "quality".
Nice job, Casana - these are great examples of what really could be considered.



Andy
__________________
'Cause you know sometimes words have two meanings.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Process

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Management Review - The heart of the QMS Hershal ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 1 26th February 2009 01:29 AM
Management Review of the QMS (Quality Management System) - How structured lance Management Review Process 76 15th November 2008 01:00 AM
Management Review of the QMS (Quality Management System) - How often (Frequency) tschones Management Review Process 90 1st July 2008 11:01 AM
Sample of QMS Management Review Meeting? JayTaz Management Review Process 7 30th May 2006 02:37 AM
Does anyone have a combined QMS and EMS management review agenda? nails Management Review Process 2 3rd February 2005 09:48 PM



The time now is 11:02 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts