|
|
 |

1st March 2006, 11:33 AM
|
|
Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Apr 2005
Location: GA
|
|
Posts: 13
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 19 Karma: 10 
|
|
Correction Fluid on documents - FDA regulations?
Where can I find reference to draw a single line through mistakes, initial, and date the entry and the format of how the month, day, and year should be writtend in the FDA regulations?
|

1st March 2006, 12:25 PM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 3,101
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dmcgriff8
Where can I find reference to draw a single line through mistakes, initial, and date the entry and the format of how the month, day, and year should be writtend in the FDA regulations?
|
I don't think that there is a required format for the date. The requirement for not using whiteout is not stated in the regulation, but they state, {the records} "shall be legible".
__________________
Al
|

1st March 2006, 12:57 PM
|
 |
Consultant
Registration Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Age: 44
|
|
Posts: 472
Thanks Given to Others: 36
Thanked 42 Times in 28 Posts
Karma Power: 43
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Al Rosen
I don't think that there is a required format for the date. The requirement for not using whiteout is not stated in the regulation, but they state, {the records} "shall be legible".
|
You also have to show that the record is not altered (white out or eraser). Most companies go overboard based on previous audits from the agency. For example, only using blue ink because you can tell an original from a copy.
The single line through a change is a procedural issue that is accepted by the industry to show when a record was changed, who changed it and when. This is part of the audit trail that is required.
__________________
Steven Walfish
When in doubt, ask your company statistician!
|

1st March 2006, 02:03 PM
|
 |
Moderator here to help
Registration Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 3,839
Thanks Given to Others: 657
Thanked 460 Times in 395 Posts
Karma Power: 191
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Statistical Steven
You also have to show that the record is not altered (white out or eraser). Most companies go overboard based on previous audits from the agency. For example, only using blue ink because you can tell an original from a copy.
The single line through a change is a procedural issue that is accepted by the industry to show when a record was changed, who changed it and when. This is part of the audit trail that is required.
|
I agree with Steven on this one. Try thinking like a customer would. Hmmm...was this record altered? Are the new changes accurate? Why hide something?
At least the single line with the initial and date of the person making the change would reflect that there was nothing to hide.
As for the "Blue" ink. I prefer to use the Blue ink verses black for the simple reason as Steven said "For example, only using blue ink because you can tell an original from a copy."
Coury Ferguson
Program/Contracts Manager
|

1st March 2006, 03:55 PM
|
 |
QA-LA
Registration Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 897
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 71
|
|
Using whiteout is not a good practice and the FDA does not like it. As far as the black/blue ink issue, years ago it was industry practice to use black ink only as blue ink did not photcopy as well, this is not the case anymore. I would also discourage using pencil to complete records as well.
|

1st March 2006, 05:48 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jan 2004
Location: University Heights, Ohio
|
|
Posts: 132
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 36
|
|
Thought on gel pens....
I used to think, ink is ink... until auditing recently and "discovered" the ink in gel pens is NOT water/liquid resistant.
For instance, in a laboratory setting, a gel pen is used to record data, the sheet gets wet... gel pens run, much like a "magic marker"... ergo, record not legible.
On a recent audit of a maintenance facility, they got a "great deal" on gel pens from a supplier of MRO stuuf... Unfortunately, many mechanics complete the paperwork and have lubricant, etc. on their hands that transfers the the "records"... many records contained data that was not legible due to the smearing/smudging of the "on sale" gel pens (which I prefer as they write so well)...
Food for thought...
__________________
Have a nice day, unless you've made other plans.
Ann Morgan cleverly disguised as "Quality PhD"
|

2nd March 2006, 07:39 AM
|
 |
QA-LA
Registration Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 897
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 71
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by QualityPhD
I used to think, ink is ink... until auditing recently and "discovered" the ink in gel pens is NOT water/liquid resistant.
For instance, in a laboratory setting, a gel pen is used to record data, the sheet gets wet... gel pens run, much like a "magic marker"... ergo, record not legible.
On a recent audit of a maintenance facility, they got a "great deal" on gel pens from a supplier of MRO stuuf... Unfortunately, many mechanics complete the paperwork and have lubricant, etc. on their hands that transfers the the "records"... many records contained data that was not legible due to the smearing/smudging of the "on sale" gel pens (which I prefer as they write so well)...
Food for thought...
|
Gel pens or "ink" of any kind that can bleed thru or smeer on a document is not allowed in the medical device arena.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|