The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notices


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th July 1999, 07:26 AM
Steph
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Red Face Level 1 and Level 2 documentation - Definitions and Differences between?

Once again I need some help. I have to explain the differences between Level 1 and Level 2 documentation to a group of area managers, this afternoon. Although I know the difference I am having a difficult time attempting to explain it. Help!

steph
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 29th July 1999, 09:34 AM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
 
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11534
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Randy
The way I understand it, level 1 established the way the overall system is to be operated. Level 2 tells who, what, where, and when. Level 3 tells how. Your managers should be told that they have direct imput and influence on the level 2 and 3 documents.

Sounds simple, but that's me.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 29th July 1999, 10:35 AM
Lassitude
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Have you seen http://Elsmar.com/doc-hier.html ? Check it out then come back and pose your questions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th July 1999, 11:35 AM
Steph
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
BIG Smile

Thanks for the help, it is simple, but I needed some new way of explaining it to them (layman's terms). They have heard my definitions at least a million times, and it helps to have a new perspective. I had forgotten about the documentation pyramid, that will definately simplify things.
Thanks again,
Steph
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29th July 1999, 11:43 AM
Lassitude
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Bomb!

If you look in the http://Elsmar.com/pdf_files/ directory there are some odds and ends on documentation there which you may be able to get some ideas from as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30th July 1999, 05:50 AM
barb butrym barb butrym is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: South Central Massachusetts
 
Posts: 788
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 151
barb butrym is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.barb butrym is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
the old pyrimid still works very well with the words presented properly...I sometimes use a house...so its in reverse...you build the foundation.......and then the roof is the records that Cover you when the rain of questions come......it all depends on the audience, and of course my mood. Either way you gotta be enthuasiastic or they won't get it.....



[This message has been edited by barb butrym (edited 30 July 1999).]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30th July 1999, 05:56 AM
barb butrym barb butrym is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: South Central Massachusetts
 
Posts: 788
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 151
barb butrym is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.barb butrym is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
another thing to remember, steph, is that you are not required to use level 1,2,3...so you can adapt those to fit the way you do business.....lots of companies combine the typical levels and even put their forms in teh procedure they come from and end up with a detailed QA manual, and a set of work instructions

[This message has been edited by barb butrym (edited 30 July 1999).]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th July 1999, 08:23 AM
ALM
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
I Say...

I have always explained it as follows:

Level One is our "statement of intent." The Standard requires your Quality System to address the elements of the Standard. Level one is our means of explaining that our quality system fulfills the elements of the Standard.

Level Two defines how we carry out the tasks to fulfill our "statements" in Level One. Defines the responsibility for tasks as well as defining the tasks themselves.

Level One - What we are going to do...

Level Two - How we are going to get it done...

Worked for me. Hope it helps some...

ALM
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Bookmarks

Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
LTPD (Lot Tolerance Percent Defective) vs. AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) Definitions johnnybegood Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 5 26th August 2009 02:54 PM
How to choose the correct General Inspection Level & AQL level...? Wesley Lai AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 5 25th February 2009 12:56 PM
Is Level 2 documentation enough? Level 3 document I want to delete is a flow chart Ernie C. ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 28 27th January 2005 05:09 PM
Structure in ISO 9001 documentation - Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level4, etc. gilsg Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7 14th October 2000 09:44 AM
Is Level 2 Documentation required or necessary? Karen ISO 9001:1994 8 26th November 1999 05:32 AM



The time now is 08:49 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts