The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th March 2006, 06:09 PM
Raquel's Avatar
Raquel Raquel is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Costa Rica/Cartago
 
Posts: 16
Thanks Given to Others: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 10
Raquel has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! How Can I compare measurements of different appraiser for a same product

I am testing a device (RF filter) which uses an external PCB matched fixture however we have big problems with this external matching (Return Loss problems) because the electronic components are so susceptible to damage so I want to use a new Network Analyzer software matching fixture to test it. I performed a correlation between them and Change the Test Data Sheet in order to change the spec. However meaurements obtained with the external matched one and the software matched fixtures are too different. And I don't know how to compare them. I have the electrical data using both fixtures and electrical test data of rejects which passed electrical test with GPPO fixture but not with external matching fixture. Does anyone have any idea? What I really don't know is what I must put in my report? Any light?


Thanks in advance

Raquel
__________________
Raquel;)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 27th March 2006, 09:22 PM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen Al Rosen is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
 
Posts: 3,101
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
Karma: 4968
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Rosen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raquel

I am testing a device (RF filter) which uses an external PCB matched fixture however we have big problems with this external matching (Return Loss problems) because the electronic components are so susceptible to damage so I want to use a new Network Analyzer software matching fixture to test it. I performed a correlation between them and Change the Test Data Sheet in order to change the spec. However meaurements obtained with the external matched one and the software matched fixtures are too different. And I don't know how to compare them. I have the electrical data using both fixtures and electrical test data of rejects which passed electrical test with GPPO fixture but not with external matching fixture. Does anyone have any idea? What I really don't know is what I must put in my report? Any light?


Thanks in advance

Raquel
  1. What does GPPO mean?
  2. Other than damage to your matching test fixture were there any other problems with the test fixture?
  3. Did the filter always meet the customers expectations after passing your testwith the old fixture?
  4. Can you attach a file with the test data for filters (more than one) tested on both systems along with the specifications for the filter?
__________________
Al
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 28th March 2006, 09:20 AM
Raquel's Avatar
Raquel Raquel is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Costa Rica/Cartago
 
Posts: 16
Thanks Given to Others: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 10
Raquel has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Unhappy

Hello Al and Thank you at least one person is interested in what i have to do.


What does GPPO mean?
This is only the name of a fixture without external matching.

Other than damage to your matching test fixture were there any other problems with the test fixture? Really not, if their components are good the fixture is OK.

Did the filter always meet the customers expectations after passing your test with the old fixture? Well, this is hard to answer because I must say Yes, if they passed the electrical test they always meet the customer specification. However if there is something that affects the part mechanically maybe they couldn't meet them.

Can you attach a file with the test data for filters (more than one) tested on both systems along with the specifications for the filter? I want to do it, but I can't because this is propietary.
__________________
Raquel;)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th March 2006, 09:42 AM
Al Rosen's Avatar
Al Rosen Al Rosen is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guyland
Age: 59
 
Posts: 3,101
Thanks Given to Others: 48
Thanked 390 Times in 272 Posts
Karma Power: 192
Karma: 4968
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Al Rosen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Al Rosen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raquel

Hello Al and Thank you at least one person is interested in what i have to do.


What does GPPO mean?
This is only the name of a fixture without external matching.

Other than damage to your matching test fixture were there any other problems with the test fixture? Really not, if their components are good the fixture is OK.

Did the filter always meet the customers expectations after passing your test with the old fixture? Well, this is hard to answer because I must say Yes, if they passed the electrical test they always meet the customer specification. However if there is something that affects the part mechanically maybe they couldn't meet them.

Can you attach a file with the test data for filters (more than one) tested on both systems along with the specifications for the filter? I want to do it, but I can't because this is propietary.
You haven't given us enough information. What tests are you performing and which test are faiing? What does the fixture do, other than match impedance? I don't have enough information.
__________________
Al
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th March 2006, 10:38 AM
Raquel's Avatar
Raquel Raquel is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: Costa Rica/Cartago
 
Posts: 16
Thanks Given to Others: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 10
Raquel has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Unhappy Giving the information

Thanks Al, and sorry I will try to explain as much as I can...


I am measuring a 1960 MHz RF Filter BW 60 MHz.
I performed Maximun Loss measurements (1930 to 1990 MHz), Bandedge measurements to 4.79, 8, 10, 12 and 13 dB, Amplitude Variation, Minimun Rejection Measurements and Return Loss measuremets in S11 and S22 ports.

My external matched fixture use a SerC 13.54 pF in Port 1 Matching and SerC 40.6 pF.

And we try to simulate this same values using the network, however I can not get a good simulation of the signal... it is good in the bandedge measurements but not in the Loss and specially in the return Loss measurements (See the attached file)

So I perform a correlation between the data I got with my external fixture with the one I get with the software matched fixture and change my TDS.

I know this matching via software looks too different...so I want to request a change, however I want to bring my report some more technical data in order to request that because this is matching was performed by the test Manager (my boss) and I want to bring him good information...

What I did to get the information was:

Test 1 reel (5K pcs only) of parts with matched existing fixture. All the rejects were saved.
Run a restest lot w/rejects for that reel using GPPO and TECO TDS developed previously.
Test manually all the rejects that passed electrical test with GPPO fixture in order to confirm them.

The results were:

I got 17 failures 3 IL, 13 VSWR/REtun Loss and 1 Upper Bandedge at 4 dB Faliures with my external matched fixture.

And 2 IL and 2 UpperBandedge Failures at 4 dB with my GPPO fixture.

So it is not catching and screening out all the failures...

This is easy to say, but what Can I conclude of this results????


Thanks
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting the post it is in, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: pdf match.pdf (72.5 KB, 63 views)
__________________
Raquel;)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
TL9000 Measurements for PC (product category) 5.3 Dbloom TL 9000 Telecommunications Standard and QuEST 3 21st May 2004 01:48 PM
Gage R&R (Repeatability and Reproducibility) Study with one appraiser MSAFAI Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2 10th September 2003 05:12 PM
Hypothesis Testing - What to use to compare the product quality of two suppliers carvind Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3 25th June 2002 02:35 PM
4.2.4.2 Measurements at appropriate stages of product realization Dawn ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 8th April 2000 08:45 PM
Who is REQUIRED to be an appraiser in MSA? cjkurtz Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1 25th December 1998 01:53 AM



The time now is 04:50 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts