The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th May 2000, 03:23 PM
akshaykm
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Let Me Help You Use of Terminology - Difference between NC, deficiency, punch lists, etc.

Can you please make a differentiation between NC and all other terminology like deficiency, punch lists etc.
We are an engineering service provider company performing tests for our clients.

When we detect a test result not meeting requirement of our contract, can we use it as a NC. The auditor says these are NC for the contractor and to be detected by the client or their authorised rep. If we are authorised for inspection ,Are wew not responsible to term it as NC ?
Please clarify.

Thanks

------------------
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 16th May 2000, 08:33 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

I would call it an anomaly (the results obtained are not the results expected). The old term was test failure but the word 'failure' has a real heavy negative effect on juries in trials.

When you are testing a company's product or material and it does not meet the specification you are testing it to, it is up to your customer to label it as nonconforming or whatever. It is their product, not yours. All you do is test it and say whether it passed the test or not.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th May 2000, 09:36 AM
akshaykm
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Marc,

Thank you for your reply. This solves the first problem ,Now what about continuous inspection result, if these are visual examination and inspections performed through out the process of construction phase.

Ak

------------------
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th May 2000, 06:53 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

"...continuous inspection result..." I don't know what you mean by this. If you are a testing laboratory you do not inspect anything per se. You test and report your findings. If there are pass-fail criteria (pass-anomaly) you report that. If, for example, you are asked to "....review material for cracks under 50X microscope..." you report either finding cracks or not finding cracks.

You talk about construction - if you test concrete strength and there is no criteria (your customer asks you to "....test to failure..." you report the point at which it breaks.

Now - are you part of the construction company or are you supplying them with a service?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th May 2000, 07:02 PM
akshaykm
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Marc,

Thanks for your analytical response. We do a steel erection -visual inspection inspection,
firestoping material inspection etc.
Apartb from abocxe we also do the laboratory testing. The question was asked keeping job site visual inspection only.

Thanks,
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Responding to customers upon receipt of an alleged medical device deficiency merlinpa Customer Complaints including ISO 10002 6 10th March 2009 11:42 AM
Value Stream Mapping (VSM) Information - Manufacture of fasteners in punch presses juliov Lean - Lean in Manufacturing and Services 24 1st October 2008 12:37 PM
Mary Wells - You Beat Me to the Punch Marc YouTube and Videos Forum 0 9th July 2008 01:01 AM
SPC for hole size taking into account punch wear Jonell SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 3 28th October 2004 01:38 PM
Control of Price Lists Marc Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3 22nd February 2000 02:38 AM



The time now is 03:18 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts