The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th May 2006, 01:56 PM
jag53's Avatar
jag53 jag53 is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 15
Karma: 10
jag53 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Calculating MTBF for an electrical component

Hi,

I am trying to calculate the MTBF for a certain electrical part that is being specially made. I have the bill of materials for this component and have purchased the Electrical Parts Reliability Data (EPRD) to obtain failure rates for each individual component. If I am correct once I have all the failure rates for each individual component, from there I can calculate the MTBF for each component (MTBF=1/Failure rate). Is the correct equation to calculate the MTBF for the electrical part = 1/(1/MTBF1+1/MTBF2+...+1/MTBFn)? Will this equation give me the MTBF for the electrical part as a whole?

Thanks,
jag53
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 17th May 2006, 04:33 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,569 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11574
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Any takers on calculating MTBF for an electrical component?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th May 2006, 09:44 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
 
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,298 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
Karma: 20405
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

There are a lot of factors to consider, such as serial vs. parallel component failures (the former assumes that a single component failure will render the assembly nonfunctional; the latter assumes that the assembly will continue to function so long as 1 of n components continues to function.

I recommend the OP have a look at MIL-HDBK-217F, the military standard for electronic assembly reliability testing.

Military Standards
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th May 2006, 09:53 AM
Tim Folkerts's Avatar
Tim Folkerts Tim Folkerts is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Age: 46
 
Posts: 900
Thanks Given to Others: 27
Thanked 249 Times in 150 Posts
Karma Power: 123
Karma: 3974
Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Tim Folkerts is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Jag53,

Yes, your equation is correct, at least for a basic mathematical prediction.
MTBF =
1 / (1/MTBF1+1/MTBF2+...+1/MTBFn)

This assumes 1) the parts are used in typical circumstances (e.g. no high temperatures) and 2) failure of any one part will lead to the failure of the whole (e.g. no redundancy). Also, if the design puts a heavy load on one part, it could fail more quickly (and if it has a light load, it might last longer).

Tim F


__________________
To wonder is to begin to understand.
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Tim Folkerts for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #5  
Old 17th May 2006, 09:56 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
 
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,298 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
Karma: 20405
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Folkerts

Jag53,

Yes, your equation is correct, at least for a basic mathematical prediction.
MTBF =
1 / (1/MTBF1+1/MTBF2+...+1/MTBFn)

This assumes 1) the parts are used in typical circumstances (e.g. no high temperatures) and 2) failure of any one part will lead to the failure of the whole (e.g. no redundancy). Also, if the design puts a heavy load on one part, it could fail more quickly (and if it has a light load, it might last longer).

Tim F


Another thing to remember is that the published MTBF values for components are not always reliable (pun intended) themselves. I've always thought that it's OK to use them as baseline values, but it's best to develop assembly reliability data independently.
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th February 2008, 05:32 AM
Sherin MR Sherin MR is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Feb 2008
 
Posts: 30
Thanks Given to Others: 23
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 8
Karma: 10
Sherin MR has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Re: Calculating MTBF for an electrical component

Hi,
Can anyone please provide the parameters to calculate failure in time of
1.Resistor
2.Capacitor
3.Diodes
4.Relays
I have gone thru the replies that i got but it doesn't satisfy my needs.

Regards,
Sherin.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th May 2008, 07:07 AM
Jupitor Jupitor is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Mar 2008
Location: india
Age: 81
 
Posts: 48
Thanks Given to Others: 228
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Karma Power: 8
Karma: 65
Jupitor has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: Calculating MTBF for an electrical component

OK, let me see if I can be of some help. Here goes!

1. Get hold of a copy of Mil-HDBK-217 F.
2. Identify your component type for which you want to calculate failure
rate, e.g. Resistor
3. What type of resistor? say wire-wound resistor. Identify the table for the
selected component type
4. In the table you will find a formula that goes like this -

Lambda b (Base failure rate- e.g. for WW resistor it is 0.0024/million hrs,)
x Pie T (Operating temperature factor)
x Pie P (factor for rated power at the selected op. temp)
x Pie E (factor for Enviromental conditions of usage, e.g. used in an
aircraft or in an airconditioned lab.etc.)
x Pie Q ( quality factor, ie, whther the component is a high reliability part
or is of commecial grade etc.)esistor.
x Pie S (the stress factor-i.e the percentage of rated power you actually
apply to the component in the interest of higher/useful life)
The table gving values for all the above factors are available in Mil-HDBK-217F.
Does this make sense to you?

[Sorry for not putting in the symbols in stead of writing Lambda etc. I don't have them in my character map].

Jupitor
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th May 2008, 07:23 AM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor Stijloor is offline
Cross Forum Moderator

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Age: 61
 
Posts: 6,628
Thanks Given to Others: 1,318
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,596 Posts
Karma Power: 377
Karma: 10939
Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Calculating MTBF for an electrical component

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupitor View Post

OK, let me see if I can be of some help. Here goes!

1. Get hold of a copy of Mil-HDBK-217 F.
Mil-HDBK-217 F can be found here.

Stijloor.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards

Bookmarks

Tags
calculating mtbf, mil-hdbk-217, mtbf, reliability


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Calculating the MTBF for an assembly, Failure and Rework Prediction e006823 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 6 30th October 2008 05:14 AM
Calculating MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) of different Electronic Components. Sherin MR Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 16 18th May 2008 08:43 AM
Calculating a Standard Deviation with respect to MTBF bucky88 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1 3rd November 2007 06:44 AM
The Anomaly of Calculating MTBF from Reliability itKiwi Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1 26th May 2007 12:15 PM
Calculating the overall MTTR for an MTBF of 476, given four subsystems jaz732 Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1 23rd April 2007 03:18 PM



The time now is 10:15 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts