The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Registrars and National / International Organizations > Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26th November 1998, 01:47 AM
chen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default QS-9000 certification of Non-automotive product

We have 2production plants in diff. country.
Plant X have big-3 product and Plant Y have no automotive product.But the big-3 product of plant X will shift to plant Y 2years later.Now plant Y is pursuing QS-9000 certification and want to pass the assessment
before the end of year 1999.
Must plant Y apply PPAP to non-automotive product?
How about plant Y apply PPAP after shifting
the BIg-3 product?
Wait for you reply.TKS!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 1st December 1998, 09:58 AM
Kevin Mader's Avatar
Kevin Mader Kevin Mader is offline
One of THE Original Covers!

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
Karma: 1335
Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Mader
Default

Chen,

You are right that you will have to perform a PPAP in order to satisfy a registrar regardless if the item you choose is produced for an OEM. The registrar is interested in the process, that you have done all the required steps and that you have the supportive documentation to back it up. This mock run will serve to satisfy their audit of your new facility. In addition, after moving an already approved PPAP product to a new location, you will be required to submit a new PPAP for that product. The only way around that would be a waiver from you OEM which is highly unlikely.

Keep in mind that PPAP is only required for product sold to an OEM. While other product does not require this process, you may ask yourself why you choose not to. This may be as a result of time and familiarity with the process putting too heavy a load on the system. I would suggest to you that you eventually apply the PPAP, FMEA, APQP, etc. requirements across the board for the simple fact that if you believe whole heartedly in that QS9000 can save you time and money while optimizing the Quality System, you will do it anyway. It sometimes is hard to convince a registrar that you are seriously persuing a QS9000 environment if you pick and choose only OEM products to provide Quality Planning for.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Registrars and National / International Organizations > Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
TS Certification for Manufacturer of Aftermarket Automotive Parts? Peters ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 3rd December 2008 04:12 PM
No Automotive Product now - Cancel TS? What if we get new business later? abd_sg ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1 9th March 2008 11:23 PM
Limiting Scope of TS 16949 Certification - Mix of Automotive and Non-Automotive dbzman ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9 11th May 2004 11:15 AM
ISO-9001:2000 vs. QS-9000 for Automotive Ind. MHughes QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 5 15th December 2000 10:22 AM
QS-9000 Registration - Logistics and sales for automotive parts Greg Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration 5 27th April 2000 02:35 AM



The time now is 01:10 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts