|
|
 |

12th August 1999, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
More GD&T - We can't compute Cpk using GD&T
Ok guys. This one really baffled me. I was in a meeting with our vendor when the program manager said. We can't compute Cpk using GD&T. (I have since convinced most of them that you actually can, thanks to everyone's input.) He then said but we can compute Cp. I have read some previous posts comparing Cp with Cpk. But I can't for the life of me figure out why you can't (or at least they say you can't) compute Cpk but can compute Cp. Are there any differences that would keep you from making the math work.
|

12th August 1999, 04:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Hi Tim!
GD&T is a common set of rules for creating a part drawing with form, fit, and function in mind. Every part has some limits above and below which you cannot go. These limits are called tolerances.
Cpk (and Cp) is a statistical calculation from [usually a sample of] the actual produced parts comparing that data TO the tolerance on the drawing.
In this order:
Create drawing with tolerances, etc.
Make parts to drawing
Analyze (measure) parts - compute average and sigma
Compare this calculation to the tolerance on the drawing.
|

13th August 1999, 10:23 AM
|
 |
dWizard
Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 475
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 63
|
|
Quote:
|
Are there any differences that would keep you from making the math work?
|
No there are not. Both equations use mean and standard deviation, along with constants (3, 6, USL, LSL, etc.) Since you can determine mean and standard deviation, if you can compute Cp on a variable, you can compute Cpk on the same variable.
Regards,
Don
------------------
Just the ramblings of an Old Wizard Warrior.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
Cpk Calculation - Tolerance to maintain 1.33 & 1.67 Cpk respectively
|
gianni |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
20 |
24th July 2009 11:23 AM |
|
Method to compute Cpk for Attribute Data?
|
reynald |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
3 |
29th January 2009 07:10 PM |
|
Relationship between Cp & Cpk
|
kedarg6500 |
SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques |
5 |
15th July 2007 08:30 AM |
|
Is it acceptable to use S bar to compute CPK?
|
darkafar |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
1 |
10th May 2007 11:58 PM |
|
Cpk on Profile - Is it possible to a Cpk study on a profile? GD&T perspective
|
brossbach |
Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. |
1 |
8th March 2001 11:30 AM |
|
|