Elsmar Cove Forum Header Graphic The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog 
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Tool Wear Control Charts to Help Control Machine Tool Offsets

Wooden Line
Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality

Related Topic Tags
control charts (general)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd January 2000, 11:32 PM
Quirino A. Balderas

 
 
Posts: n/a
Tool Wear Control Charts

Can someone give me some guidance on which type of control charts can we use to control a machining process in which tool wear is prominent.

We need a control chart that keeps the process in control while it also informs when an offset is required.

Using a normal X-R chart only detects the process variability and does not take into account the tool wear. Our operators have to constantly do tool offsets in order to stay in control. The machine capability is over 3 showing that the machine is very capable and that we can ride the tool wear but that takes us off the control limits.

We need something easy for our operators to follow and control the offsets without processing any out of spec parts.



------------------

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 24th January 2000, 03:48 PM
Don Winton's Avatar
Don Winton

 
 
Posts: 484
I Say...

I am not sure of the details, so I must speculate.

I would assume that the tool wear is directly related to the amount of parts produced. A simple DoE test would determine the relationship. Thus, a simple linear regression chart may be appropriate.

Use the control charts to monitor the parts, use the linear regression chart to monitor tool wear. Used correctly, the operators would know when to adjust before the tool wear caused problems with the control charts.

Regards,

Don
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 24th January 2000, 04:48 PM
Laura M's Avatar
Laura M

 
 
Posts: 761
I've seen the regression line as Don suggests built into the control chart. The control limits also follow the regression line slope +/- 3sigma on either side of the line. If tool wear is fairly consistent between tools, then the slope can be determined, applied to a starting point of a new tool, and control limits "drawn" from there. Kind of like confidence intervals around the regression line. A point over(or under) the control limit "early" in the life of the tool would indicate a special cause. Later in the life of the tool, the same sample mean may occur, but be within the limits... not a special cause. Hopefully this makes sense...easier with a chalk board...May have the formula's in some old notes somewhere. If someone wants me to dig them out, I'll try.
  #4  
Old 24th January 2000, 06:34 PM
Dawn

 
 
Posts: 301
We SHALL monitor on-going capability monthly for a customer requirement. We just started doing this and the customer hasn't seen them yet, but will soon. Almost all of our cpk's show downward trend. I think this is due to toolwear-but is only my assumption. Your thoughts? If so, could we not use these cpk's to monitor tool wear?
  #5  
Old 24th January 2000, 11:22 PM
Quirino A. Balderas

 
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Thanks Laura:

It makes a lot of sense what you replied. The tool wear is due to the number of parts machined and according to a simple DOE performed by turning 300 parts without any offsets I have a clear idea of how the measurements are affected. I will therefore construct a chart in which every so many parts there will be a different target XBar and post the control limits allowed for that target Xbar.

Thank again for your valuable input to everyone.

Q. Balderas

------------------
  #6  
Old 31st January 2000, 07:03 PM
Don Winton's Avatar
Don Winton

 
 
Posts: 484
I Say...

Dawn,

You can chart the process capability on a control chart, just as any other variable. As for the assumption regarding tool wear, it is risky to assume.

Regards,

Don
  #7  
Old 18th February 2009, 12:29 PM
bobdoering's Avatar
bobdoering

 
 
Posts: 3,941
Re: Tool Wear Control Charts

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Quirino A. Balderas View Post

Can someone give me some guidance on which type of control charts can we use to control a machining process in which tool wear is prominent.

We need a control chart that keeps the process in control while it also informs when an offset is required.

Using a normal X-R chart only detects the process variability and does not take into account the tool wear. Our operators have to constantly do tool offsets in order to stay in control. The machine capability is over 3 showing that the machine is very capable and that we can ride the tool wear but that takes us off the control limits.

We need something easy for our operators to follow and control the offsets without processing any out of spec parts.
This is a great explanation of the classic problem! The correct chart is the X hi/lo-R chart. For more information on preparing this chart, see: Statistical process control for precision machining
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
NC Program Rev Control and Tool Control & Maintenance PrissiDe AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2 14th October 2011 10:34 AM
Is tool wear monitoring and MTBF of machine parts considered as PdM? calibration-emd Manufacturing and Related Processes 6 27th April 2010 03:44 PM
Sloping control chart to take care of tool wear - Details needed bkarthikeyan Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5 14th January 2009 03:19 PM
To take into account the tool wear during calculating control limits Star18 Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6 6th February 2007 04:19 PM
Monitoring Tool Wear - Seeking: Suggestions on a database for Monitoring Tool Wear Dawn Manufacturing and Related Processes 3 7th July 2004 02:46 PM



The time now is 05:28 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".