The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th March 2000, 10:18 PM
Dawn Dawn is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
 
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 40
Dawn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Capability Studies - 5 different dimensions - How many parts?

Recently we did a capability study on a press with 5 different dimensions. They took parts that were ran for 1 hour. This took approximately 3 full working days with 3 quality techs to complete. Is it a standard when doing a capability study to take parts for 1 full consecutive hour?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 6th March 2000, 09:22 AM
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Spaceman Spiff Spaceman Spiff is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 1999
Location: FL
Age: 44
 
Posts: 73
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 45
Karma: 10
Spaceman Spiff has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I Say...

... not according to the PPAP manual, 3rd Edition. The manual states that an 8 hrs. run is required to do capability study. However, what you did is often what injection molders do to tweek in the tool (correlating all the cavitites). I guess the bottomline is what is it that you want out of the capability study.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 6th March 2000, 10:32 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

I think you're saying it took 3 techs 3 days (9 man days) to measure the 5 dimensions on each part...

Naw - we're missing something here. I know there is an 8 hour run requirement, but some suppliers produce 1 item every 2 hours and some produce 2,000 per hour. Logic tells us there is a limit.

That having been said, I don't have the answer - we need some to hear from someone who has done it.

Calvin to Spiff - you're high volume?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th March 2000, 09:08 AM
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Spaceman Spiff Spaceman Spiff is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 1999
Location: FL
Age: 44
 
Posts: 73
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 45
Karma: 10
Spaceman Spiff has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I Say...

I'm not sure if we are high volume, but we produce on an average 1000 assemblies per day per line (my last job we produced 30,000 assemblies per day per line).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8th March 2000, 11:06 AM
billsfan
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Covering Ass

Hi all,
I wouldn't consider myself an expert, but if I had a dollar for every PPAP I've done I could retire.
Let's see if I can shed some light....
Remember the 7 P's - "Proper Prior Planning Prevents **** Poor Performance." Have a plan before you start making parts. (I also prefer having my customers' buy in on the plan.)
First, page 2 of the PPAP manual (third edition) talks about a significant production run (1.2.1). As has been mentioned previously, some companies could manufacture thousands of parts in 8 hours, some just a handful. You must do what makes sense to you and your customer. After all, you are trying to prove that you can produce product consistently meeting the design record and specifications. Some or perhaps all of the parts that you run will be used for the process study.
Next, page 6 describes the initial process studies (1.2.2.9) By now you should have determined what if any "critical or key characteristics" are on this part, either specified by your customer or determined internally. This or these characteristics are what you will do you capability study on.
You must perform a Gage R&R on the equipment used to measure this or these characteristics. Then you start collecting data. As stated in NOTE 4 PG. 6) "a short term study should be based on a minimum of 25 subgroups containing at least 100 readings..." Now if you make 1000 parts per hour obviously you're not going to measure every part. I would take samples throughout the run until I had 100 readings. If you make 100 parts a day I would either measure all of those parts or get the customer to agree to something less.
You don't want to mislead your customer or your company. If you have a process that produces MANY parts per hour and you only produce 100 consecutive parts for the capability study, what does that really tell you when you're done? That you can run 100 parts successfully? What about the next 1000, 10000 or million? If it only took you 15 mins. to run these parts, now you know that you can run successfully for 15 mins. but what about the next few hours, days, weeks, years? Wouldn't you like to know that you have a stable and capable process prior to shipping parts off to the customer? So would they! PPAP is how you prove it.
Sorry, I seem to have rambled...
Hope this helped.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th March 2000, 11:40 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Money

Do ramble on. This is the kind of detailed, reasoned info we need in response to questions here. Any more advice and details will be much appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th March 2000, 03:31 PM
billsfan
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Covering Ass

Marc & "the gang",
If it's details you want, then let's try an example. First, something simple. You die stamp metal parts, coil fed, single die. Which meens you produce one part every time the machine cycles. The only "critical or key characteristic" on the customer drawing is length. This dimension is 1" +/- .01. First you need a piece of measuring equipment capable of measuring out to 3 decimal places (10x rule). Perform a Gage R&R. If aceptable results, perform initial process capability study.
This is where the rubber meets the road. To keep the example simple, let's say that this is the first time making these parts, but that you make very similar parts of different lengths. After set-up approval, you start collecting samples over time for your capablity study. Again to keep this simple, let's say that you make 50 parts per hour. According to your previously agreed upon plan, you'll be taking 5 parts per 1/2hour, measuring the length of each and charting on an x bar & r chart. You run for 10 hours, produce 500 parts, & collect data from 100 of the 500 parts. This data can then be analyzed to determine Cpk/Ppk.
Things start getting complicated when you're talking about multi-cavity molds or dies, multiple stations or fixtures and numerous "critical or key characteristics".
To get more specific, I would need more information. If I haven't shed any light let's at least hope I didn't muddy the waters!
Later dudes......
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Differences between Machine Capability and Product Capability studies Mumus Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 9 14th October 2007 12:01 PM
Capability Studies - Fewest Number of Parts for a Capability Study ivo Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 9 20th June 2006 04:25 PM
Gage R&R study requirements - What dimensions are you doing studies on? jager Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 9 30th March 2006 06:29 PM
Machine Capability Studies: How many parts needed? Dawn SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 11 21st March 2001 02:17 PM
Capability Studies - Combining parts from two lots Dawn SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 17 24th November 1999 01:09 AM



The time now is 05:41 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts