The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th April 1999, 10:22 PM
chen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Layout Inspection and Functional Testing

"a layout inspection and a functional verification shall be performed for all products at a frequency established by the customer." from 4.10.4.1 #40 of QS9K

Here layout inspection means we must measure all dimensions showed on design drawings
or we measure some dimensions decided by us ?

have a nice day. APR.,09/1999
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 9th April 1999, 01:28 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,565 Times in 1,017 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11554
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

I believe it is Chrysler which mandates a yearly layout. It is now in QS9000. It is the same layout you did for PPAP, as I understand it.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 10th April 1999, 01:12 PM
Batman
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Chen!

Many of our first and second tier customers require an "annual PPAP." This is to fulfill the QS9000 requirement to their customers. There is another reason. You should be making product to the latest [agreed-to] customer revision. Since many of our customers transmit orders via a kanban type electronic system, from a blanket order, they are only asking for a part number and quantity. Rarely do these daily / weekly orders include versions, or revisions, to their drawings. So an annual PPAP assures at least a review of your documentation system and their files contain the latest drawing revision submission from us, and allows them to be able to submit PPAP to their customers.

We are not required to perform annual layouts for some of our customers if there has been a PPAP submitted for any reason in past 6 months. We have this in writing from them.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th April 1999, 04:02 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,565 Times in 1,017 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11554
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Batman:

Thanks for helping out with some details. It's a 1 piece inspection of every dimension on the drawing (and each note as well) as I understand it. Am I correct?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19th April 1999, 02:36 AM
Batman
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, each feature on the drawing - dimensions, notes, material properties, surface finish, gage, etc. Also, at least one part from each cavity, too. Some customers want 2 per cavity, fixture, etc. If you have a 16 cavity tool, 16 layout sheets are needed. We have several duplicate assembly fixtures that produce the same part - that means a layout for each.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13th April 2000, 06:29 AM
kavosh
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Dear colleagues,

I read the comments on Layout inspection. I've been taught that layout inspection includes tearing down the product and measuring all and every point mentioned in the drawing/specs on every part of the product. The emphasis was on all parts of the product.

Is that correct?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13th April 2000, 08:34 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,565 Times in 1,017 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11554
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

Quote:
Originally posted by kavosh:

I've been taught that layout inspection includes tearing down the product and measuring all and every point mentioned in the drawing/specs on every part of the product. The emphasis was on all parts of the product.

Is that correct?
It can be. Typically a layout inspection is where you take the print and a part (or in your case an assembly) and you measure every feature on the print. However, some customers only ask for critical characteristics be verified. In the case of an assembly, I have not personally seen a requirement that an assembly be broken down and all sub-parts measured to print - this is typically done by the suppliers of the individual parts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Annual Requirements - TS 16949 - 8.2.4.1 Layout inspection and functional testing atlantisind Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 2 18th October 2006 11:32 AM
'Final Inspection' and 'Layout & Functional Testing' - Part of Control Plan? jhoniegudel FMEA and Control Plans 6 17th June 2006 11:04 AM
Layout inspection - When is a layout inspection required? andre-soares Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 4 15th September 2005 08:19 AM
8.2.4.1 Layout inspection - When is a full layout required and how often? Ayelet Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 8 23rd February 2005 03:50 PM
Layout inspection and functional testing Dawn Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 1 26th March 2000 01:32 AM



The time now is 09:15 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts