|
|
 |
|

23rd April 2000, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
AQL vs PPM
From: David Chan, Jenny Chan
> ...can anyone tell me that the relationship between AQL and PPM..
> somebody told me that 0.065% AQL = 650PPM, is it true ???
>
> i personally think that it isn't , but cannot get proven evident.. can
> u help me ??
>
> tx..
>
> Jenny Chan...
|

23rd April 2000, 11:27 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
I can't help you with the actual numbers off hand, but AQL is Acceptable Quality Level as a per cent. Used in inspection to determine sample size, you decide the AQL level you want and a chart gives you a sample size. Your knowns are the lot size which you look up on the table, and the AQL level you want.
PPM is Parts Per Million which can be converted to a %.
Maybe one of the others can help you out with details and numbers.
|

24th April 2000, 12:13 PM
|
 |
dWizard
Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 475
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 63
|
|
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) is defined by ANSI/ISO/ASQC A3534 as follows: "When a continuing series of lots is considered, a quality level which for purposes of sampling inspection is the limit of satisfactory process average."
The associated AQL and Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD) are summarized graphically by the operating characteristic curve.
<font COLOR="#DF0218"><BLOCKQUOTE>…somebody told me that 0.065% AQL = 650PPM, is it true ???</BLOCKQUOTE></font>
Strictly speaking, no. But, a case could be made that if the AQL was, in fact, 0.065%, then the PPM might be 650. The problem is, AQL is an Acceptable Quality level, not the Actual Quality Level. AQL is the quality level that would be detectable under a certain sampling plan.
Also strictly speaking, the LTPD * 10,000 = PPM nonconforming.
Regards,
Don
|

18th June 2002, 11:15 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
I got this e-mail today. I know this is an old thread, but it's worth opening back up for a bit.
On 6/18/02 6:29 PM, arnulfom wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Sorry for bother you, look, I saw a thread at the cove forum where you talk
> about the PPM vs AQL.
>
> I have a doubt and could not get in touch with any one in the forum due to
> failure comunication problems, my question as follows:
>
> If I have an AQL=0.1, which is the number of defective parts per million I
> will give my customer?<hr>Also see AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) vs. LTPD (Lot Tolerance Percent Defective)
and
Information about PPM since giving up AQL - Historical description of requirements
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

18th June 2002, 11:36 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 69
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Karma Power: 41 Karma: 80 
|
|
You can't get to PPM from AQL. There are many OC curves that will pass through a single AQL. If you're interested in the conversion, you'll need to specify both ends of the curve and then look at the associated AOQL levels. Typically, you'll find the worst case AOQL level at Pa = .50.
|

19th June 2002, 03:52 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: Travelling around Europe
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 191
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 42 Karma: 27 
|
|
I hate the word "Acceptable" in AQL, it suggests we are doomed to failure before we start.
|

19th June 2002, 07:23 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Geoff
Is it a realistic understanding of processes and variation ?
|

19th June 2002, 08:04 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: Travelling around Europe
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 191
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 42 Karma: 27 
|
|
Cp and Pp do that for me.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|