The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th September 2000, 06:59 PM
J. Otto
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Statistically Valid Sample Sizes For SPC

Hello All,

I am looking for some input into sample size considerations and frequecy of sample pulls for production lots that we are calculating Ppk values on. Currently we are pulling 4 parts every 2 hours for each process to calculate Ppk values on. My concern is that this is the 4 parts every 2 hours is regardless of cycle time or production lot size.

Is there an issue with being statistically valid in our calculations based on sample size and frequency. As an example, I may have two seperate production lots that I am going to run for 24 hours. The first process may have a cycle time of 10 seconds and the second process may have a cycle time of 20 seconds. After 24 hours of production, this would result in first process having twice as much product than the second process. Should we be increasing our sample size and/or frequency of pulls for the first process?????

If there is any information available or if anyone has any suggestions on what makes for statistically valid sample sizes and frequency of sampling, please let me know.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Jon
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 29th September 2000, 01:39 AM
Rick Goodson's Avatar
Rick Goodson Rick Goodson is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
 
Posts: 229
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 20
Rick Goodson has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Your question is very good, but unfortunately complex and not easily answered in a paragraph or two. Never the less, some thoughts and suggestions.

From a protection point of view, absolute sample size of a random sample is more important than its relative size compared to lot size. This is readily apparent if you look at Operating Characteristic Curves for a constant sample size and with differing lot sizes.

With regard to sample size in X-bar and R charts, the essential idea is to select subgroups to minimize the opprotunity for variation with-in a subgroup. We want them small. However, a size of four works best because with a sample of four the distribution of X-bar is nearly normal even though the samples are taken from a non-normal universe.

The frequency of the sampling is an economic decision based on what happens to material produced between samples if we find an out of control condition. Theoretically frequency should be often when analyzing a process initially and the reduced once the process is under control and running well.

Take a look at the following references for detail on sample size selection and frequency:

Statistical Process Control by Grant and Leavenworth, ISBN 0-07-844354-7

AT&T Statistical Quality Control Hanbook (Mine is so old id does not have an ISBN)

Quality Control by Dale Besterfield
ISBN 0-13-025668-4
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Assumptions with Small Sample Sizes telefrog Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 11 10th September 2008 12:57 PM
Statistically valid method for multiple raw material sampling sidmishra Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 4 29th May 2008 12:52 PM
How to Select a Statistically Valid Sampling Plan hitesh Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 10 23rd April 2008 06:09 PM
Auditing Statistically - A statistical approach to sample sizes M Greenaway ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions 11 11th January 2002 08:50 PM
Sample Sizes and A2, A3, B4, d2 Factor Parameters kristof nuyts SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 4 10th December 2001 10:26 AM



The time now is 08:09 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts