The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Process


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th January 2000, 11:22 PM
Dawn Dawn is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
 
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 40
Dawn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Laughing Hit for not reviewing System Suitability in Management Review

I took a hit for not reviewing system suitability in Mgmt. Rev. (QS). I am compiling a list of all elements with their procedures and work instructions to review each one in meeting. Does anyone have any other way to cover this?
Thanks, Dawn
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th January 2000, 08:04 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

You have me on this one. I've never heard of a company being cited for not reviewing suitability.

I pressure my clients to have a management review check list. One for ISO is in the Elsmar.com/pdf_files directory - file name is Mgmt_rev.pdf It was for ISO9000 but can be easily configured for QS. I put this form together some years ago because I got tired of auditors nit picking about each line item. I'm not convinced you have to address every single procedure and work instruction - my clients have told the auditor this is a general conversation / discussion - that suitability was a consideration throughout. For example, "...we eqach consider suitability of our systems during every meeting as a normal part of our reviews. We do not, however, have a special session or part of our meeting where we individually discuss at length suitability of each system, it's procedures and work instructions. When a meeting member feels a system or element of a system is no longer appropriate (suitable), s/he will bring it up as a specific topic. If we all concur it is put on our agenda as an action item and assigned to the appropriate employee."

If I was going to respond, I would put 'Suitabbility of existing systems' as 1 line item on the management review form. I see no requirement to go theough each system and each of their elements (procedures, WI's, etc.) individually during a management review meeting.

Did the auditor state his/her expectations? If not, I would contact him/her and ask. You might even get it in writing (a bit antagonistic, though).
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 9th January 2000, 11:04 PM
Dawn Dawn is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
 
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 40
Dawn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
His exact words (in writing) were "No conclusions documented in management review records on suitability of the system."
My fix was "A breakdown of every element is provided to assure there is enough documentation; too much documentation; if processes are still acceptable; and if they are adequate for what we are doing."
This is what he wnats to see.
I will download the pdf file. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th January 2000, 11:15 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

As I said, the pdf file is a simple form. I press the form (check list if you will) idea on clients to reduce nit-picking opportunities. Thjat said, the auditor question will be" Explain what criteria you use..." or something like same. The form does make you address each issue during the meeting, however, if even briefly, so there you go!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th January 2000, 08:16 AM
Al
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
During our first ISO-9000 audit we were given a "concern" for the same thing. We solved this by stating that during our Annual Management Review meeting the Management Representive shall comment on his/her review of the Quality System in regards to its continued suitability and effectiveness in satisfying the requirements of...(see 4.1.3) A summary of these comments would then be captured in the meeting minutes. Remember to state what the conclusion of this review was within the minutes or you'll still get "dinked."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th January 2000, 10:12 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Covering Ass

Dawn,
I received one minor and four "observations" for not adequatly reviewing "suitability and effectiveness".
I was told by the auditors and also at a seminar I attended; presented by a registrar, that each element of the standard must be evaluated for continued "suitability and effectiveness" a minimumm of one time per year.
Suggested suitable means for evidence of review should be in the form of a checklist; questions referring to suitability and questions referring to effectiveness.
At first I thought this might be a liitle bit of overkill, however the standard does not say how to do it, just do it.
My question; Could this review be combined with the audit process. Establish an audit schedule such that at the closing meeting the suitability and effectiveness could be addressed.

Feedback any one.

By the way, Marc, I used your management review pdf at my last audit and received rave reviews from the auditor.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26th January 2000, 12:29 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Lurker

Quote:
Originally posted by Sam:
By the way, Marc, I used your management review pdf at my last audit and received rave reviews from the auditor.
It's just a simple 'helper' - I'm happy that it helped you!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Management Review Process

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Management Review of the QMS (Quality Management System) - How structured lance Management Review Process 76 15th November 2008 01:00 AM
Management Review of the QMS (Quality Management System) - How often (Frequency) tschones Management Review Process 90 1st July 2008 11:01 AM
Reviewing Corrective Action Status for effective Management Review mlthompson Management Review Process 5 28th February 2007 01:55 AM
Suitability of in-process automated inspection system - Stamping house Phil P Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 11 23rd June 2005 12:13 PM
How do you determine system suitability and effectiveness of a new system? goose ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 3 2nd September 2001 03:23 PM



The time now is 05:25 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts