The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Standards and Requirements > AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements
Forum Username

Search the Elsmar Cove
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access

Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th December 2006, 09:57 AM
speck's Avatar
speck speck is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Dec 2006
Location: wisconsin
 
Posts: 41
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 30
speck has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

Configuration management seems to be a great big black hole that everything seems to fall in. We are exempt from 7.3 and only heat treat customers product. Justification is we develop the process to manufacture the product not the product itself. We only have 1 single part number for a company that we cannot validate through final inspection. As far as configuration management I am very confused as to what else is involved aside from document control and process change control and what the requirements are. Much has been written about this but most applies to D & D also. The general consensus seems to be if you have a good document control system in place then don't make C.M. overly complicated. I guess I just don't know how to ask a specific question because I don't know where to start with making sure we are compliant to 4.3 or not.

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 12th December 2006, 01:16 PM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey Wes Bucey is offline
Quality Manager

 
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
 
Posts: 10,934
Thanks Given to Others: 517
Thanked 3,029 Times in 1,952 Posts
Karma Power: 1181
Karma: 21621
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

You might find some insight about Configuration Management in reading this old thread
http://elsmar.com/Forums/showpost.ph...68&postcount=4

__________________

"Few minds wear out; more rust out"
Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 12th December 2006, 01:38 PM
speck's Avatar
speck speck is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Dec 2006
Location: wisconsin
 
Posts: 41
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 30
speck has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

Thanks for the input. I read that several times before I posted. Am I on track by saying CM is nothing more than document and record control, redeveloping the control plan or heat treat processes, notifying proper parties, proper first article inspection, and then monitoring the change for proper validation. I think I am trying to overthink this a bit too much.
  #4  
Old 12th December 2006, 02:01 PM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey Wes Bucey is offline
Quality Manager

 
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
 
Posts: 10,934
Thanks Given to Others: 517
Thanked 3,029 Times in 1,952 Posts
Karma Power: 1181
Karma: 21621
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by speck View Post

Thanks for the input. I read that several times before I posted. Am I on track by saying CM is nothing more than document and record control, redeveloping the control plan or heat treat processes, notifying proper parties, proper first article inspection, and then monitoring the change for proper validation. I think I am trying to overthink this a bit too much.
Close, but not quite. The folks in aerospace and electrical engineering (somewhat in software) make a big deal out of compatibility with ALL Associated Dociuments (read Processes, such as interchangeability; inspection tools, instruments, tolerances; etc.)

For example, if you heat treat widgets for customer A and also heat treat gizmos to the same spec for Customer B, do they both fit in same pan or rack? Same dwell time? Does either customer have a requirement to keep Rockwell points away from certain area of the part?

The customer -specific instructions and requirements are part of the so-called Associated Documents. Depending whether you use gas or electric furnace, is there any fluctuation in energy supply which might affect your process? (I recall an instance in the 60's when the local gas company in Long Island City suddenly began delivering gas with a lower BTU per cubic foot than previously, without notice, causing a lot of fouled up heat treating for at least one company.)

My consistent thesis is good CM requires the input of a person knowledgeable about all the possible "What ifs" which can affect the organization's product or service and makes provision to check the interactions if any one of the factors fluctuates or changes. I do not think it is a "clerk job."

__________________

"Few minds wear out; more rust out"
Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857
Thanks to Wes Bucey for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #5  
Old 12th December 2006, 03:00 PM
speck's Avatar
speck speck is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Dec 2006
Location: wisconsin
 
Posts: 41
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 30
speck has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

Thanks again. Mr. Lamen is a nice man and his terms are someone I can relate to. This helps a lot. Seems though that this is a sticky area even for some experience people. I'll chew on this example and relate to our production processes.
  #6  
Old 12th December 2006, 03:12 PM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is offline
Cross Forum Moderator

 
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
 
Posts: 14,077
Thanks Given to Others: 2,051
Thanked 5,994 Times in 3,820 Posts
Blog Entries: 2
Karma Power: 1532
Karma: 42507
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by speck View Post

Thanks again. Mr. Lamen is a nice man and his terms are someone I can relate to.
Who is Mr. Lamen?

__________________

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. --Upton Sinclair
  #7  
Old 12th December 2006, 03:47 PM
speck's Avatar
speck speck is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Dec 2006
Location: wisconsin
 
Posts: 41
Thanks Given to Others: 6
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 30
speck has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Configuration Management Simplified - Complying with AS9100 Clause 4.3

"In Laymenís terms" or AS9100 for dummies, whatever you would like to call it. Less inexperienced people like me aren't quite as technically savvy yet or good spellers apparently.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Aerospace and Aviation Standards and Requirements > AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Configuration Management - AS9100 Requirements Kasturi.P.Shetty AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 8 24th June 2011 04:52 PM
Is Configuration Management Mandatory? AS9100 Clause 7.1.3 speck AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 9 10th March 2011 11:01 PM
Configuration Management - AS9100 Rev B or C Mbarr AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 7 13th August 2010 07:44 AM
Configuration Management Basics - AS9100 Koivisto - 2009 AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 9 7th January 2009 03:12 AM
Configuration Management Exemption? AS9100 normzone AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 14 15th September 2008 12:29 PM



The time now is 03:54 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".