The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th July 2001, 06:14 AM
raghuraman
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Cpk value interpretation - What is the significance of Cpk value of 1.33?

can somebody educate me how to interpret this.

I got a Cp value of 1.00 and a Cpk of 0.9. But all the X bar values are within UCL and LCL. Does this mean that the process is under control. If so, what is the significance of Cpk value of 1.33
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th July 2001, 03:26 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

raghuraman:

Cp = Rating of specification limit usage
Cpk = Rating of process centering

Even if all Xbar values are within the control limits one of the individuals in the samle size could be out of the control limit.

Therefore beacause the Xbars are within limits does not always mean the process is in control.

You have to ensure that the process is stable by removing special causes and ensure there are no runs or trends.

In the case of inherent causes you need to identify them and control depending upon what your specs or customer requirements are. A type of inherent cause would be tool wear.

From the limited data you provided, my guess is you are not in control because the values you provided lead me to Guess that your range is unstable which means a higher sigma and lower Cp/Cpk readings.


Any help from someone more experienced in the process?

ASD...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 9th July 2001, 10:43 AM
Rick Goodson's Avatar
Rick Goodson Rick Goodson is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
 
Posts: 229
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 20
Rick Goodson has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Al,

Your logic is right on target IMHO. Cp does not take into account the process centering. Once you look at Cpk you have to consider the process centering and the process can be out of control. The fact that the X-bars are within limits does not speak to individual x's or to the overall spread of the subgroups. I suspect, as you do, that the range chart, or sigma chart as the case may be, is not in control.

raghuraman,

With regard to CPK of 1.33, that is an arbitrary value that basically allows the process some wiggle room with in the specification limits while still being in control. As the CPK goes up the wiggle room gets greater. Keep in mind that process variation and process centering are two separate process characteristics that are conveniently measured together by Cpk. They should be understood separately from each other. Remember, the process does not know what the specifications are. The process can be statistical control and capable or not capable depending on how we arbritrarily set the specification.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th February 2006, 10:03 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 604
Karma: 11544
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Also see: Process Capability - Cp vs. Cpk for a good visual showing the distinction.
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Cpk Calculation - Tolerance to maintain 1.33 & 1.67 Cpk respectively gianni Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 20 24th July 2009 11:23 AM
Is Cpk a good measure of capability? There are several shortcomings of Cpk Tim Folkerts Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 31 12th February 2009 07:39 PM
Basic Cpk interpretation kball Student Research Questions - Any Educational Institution 3 29th July 2007 08:15 PM
Validation of Cpk and Ppk calculations - Sheet to check Cpk and Ppk values Howard Atkins SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 0 20th February 2006 03:41 AM
Cp and Cpk - Cpk is an index that should be applied to a stable process Don Winton Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 16 13th August 2001 06:50 PM



The time now is 10:00 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts