The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Six Sigma


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th July 2001, 05:36 AM
sotiris
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question 6 Sigma Only for Giants?

About this six sigma matter, as I recall, Deming did not have a very positive attitude in his last book.Why? Does it work? Works only for giants like Motorola?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 9th July 2001, 09:58 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Juran is not positive about the six sigma process either.
My question is, why stop with six sigma? Why not go on with 9, 12, 15,18 . . . ?
We could go on forever, the tails of the curve will never go to "0".
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 9th July 2001, 10:52 AM
Michael T's Avatar
Michael T Michael T is offline
Semper Gumby

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Age: 46
 
Posts: 287
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 43
Karma: 181
Michael T is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Michael T is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
I Say...

Hi Sotiris,

As I understand Dr. Deming's less than supportive comments concerning Six Sigma (this is just my interpretation/opinion), it all stems from the philosophy of conforming to specifications. Conformance to specifications does not take into consideration the loss associated with variation. While a process can be within specification, the variation around X-bar may be widely dispersed. Even with special causes of variation eliminated (the process is considered "in control"), the goal should be to reduce the common causes of variation to obtain a tight grouping around x-bar, not maintain conformance to specifications. By adding a Taguchi Loss Function, it is possible to observe that, the further a process moves from optimal, the greater the loss to the customer. That should be the goal - reducing the loss to the customer, not conformance to a specification. As Dr. Deming states, "The most important use of a loss function is to help us to change from a world of specifications (meet specifications) to continual reduction of variation about the target through improvement of processes." (The New Economics, Chapter 10).

Now, my thoughts on Six Sigma (taking Dr. Deming's System of Profound Knowledge and the philosophy of continuous improvement into consideration) are that Six Sigma focus's too much on the short term benefits derived from a Six Sigma project (and the financial gains derived from it). It lacks the long term focus necessary to fundamentally change the company culture to one of, say, Kaizen. Six Sigma seems to be looking for those big gains, overlooking the small incremental changes to a process that can reduce common causes of variation and tighten the process to get ever closer to the target value. Another problem I see with Six Sigma is that the focus is on large dollar projects. For example, at the onset of a Six Sigma program, projects will only be accepted if the expected payback exceeds a certain dollar figure, say $750,000. Eventually, those projects will be come more scarce as the number of "big ticket" projects diminishes. Then what? Lower the expected payback value? Ok... sure - drop the payback to $500,000. Eventually, those projects will also dry up. If the target payback keeps getting smaller, eventually the cost of a implementing a project will exceed it's payback. Yet, in all this hoopla about Six Sigma, where are those small changes to a process that the person on the shop floor can tell you about that can make a process a little better, get the product manufactured a little easier or a little quicker. There aren't any huge $$ gains, just the small incremental increases that lead to enhanced productivity, reduced variation and more contented line workers who feel that management is listening to them and they have control over their process.

Now - I am not saying Six Sigma is a bad thing. It is a step in the right direction. Training people in process improvement, SPC, DOE, etc., cannot be a bad thing. Like ISO or QS, it is a good start towards a process of continuous improvement, and that (continuous improvement) should be the ultimate goal of management.

So... does Six Sigma work. The short answer is, yes, Six Sigma works. Does it only work for giants? Don't know... Motorola is huge and has gained a great deal of notoriety because of Six Sigma. I don't know of any small companies that have implemented Six Sigma because you just don't hear of them.

Anyway - these are my thoughts on the subject. I'm donning my asbestos underware for the flames I may catch for this post...

Cheers!!!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th July 2001, 10:52 AM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Sam,

I like your style of thinking. Maybe after 6 sigma we can have 8 sigma, including all the new books, training, and associated costs.

Where will the madness end?

ASD...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Six Sigma

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
I am Going to Implement Deming's 12th Point for my Staff ScottK Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 8 23rd August 2006 12:54 AM
Deming's SoPK (System of Profound Knowledge) Discussion WALLACE Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 214 29th December 2004 05:13 PM
Quality Games and Deming's Red Bead Experiment Paul Alexander Training - Internal, External and Distance Learning 18 3rd September 2004 04:04 AM
Deming's SoPK (System of Profound Knowledge) Challenge WALLACE Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 66 2nd February 2004 03:10 AM
Deming's philosophy in education? WALLACE Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 5 5th June 2002 09:12 AM



The time now is 08:00 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts