|
|
 |

10th February 2007, 03:05 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Feb 2007
|
|
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 12 Karma: 10 
|
|
Measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate
Hi,
I am student doing my masters in quality management and i have a subject on calibration.
I would like to understand what should be done if measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate?
Regards
|

10th February 2007, 03:14 PM
|
 |
QA Systems Coordinator
Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 42
|
|
Posts: 720
Thanks Given to Others: 327
Thanked 224 Times in 134 Posts
Karma Power: 73
|
|
Re: Measurement uncertainity not present
Quote:
Originally Posted by arpitha
Hi,
I am student doing my masters in quality management and i have a subject on calibration.
I would like to understand what should be done if measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate?
Regards
|
Is it instruments that you are calibrating, or instruments that you are having calibrated externally? What kind of instruments are you talking about?
__________________
Beetle Bailey Rules!
|

10th February 2007, 04:58 PM
|
 |
Metrologist-Auditor
Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal, California, U.S.
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 1,621
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 310 Times in 224 Posts
Karma Power: 186
|
|
Re: Measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate
Arpitha,
First is to determine whether your location (which is not listed) offically recognizes what is known as the 4:1 ratio, and whether you are asking with respect to ISO/IEC 17025. If you are asking with respect to ISO/IEC 17025, then under clause 5.10.4 either uncertainty or an "accepted metrological standard" must be referenced. The 4:1 is an accepted metrological standard.
If 4:1 is referenced you do have the right to ask the calibration provider for proof of the 4:1 for that calibration. They won't like it.
If 4:1 is not officially recognized where you are, then the uncertainty needs to be there, or your calibration is NOT traceable.....the VIM requires an unbroken chain of comparisons to National or international standards, and stated uncertainties at each step, in order to be a traceable calibration.
Hope this helps.
Hershal
|

10th February 2007, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,297 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
|
|
Re: Measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate
Quote:
Originally Posted by arpitha
Hi,
I am student doing my masters in quality management and i have a subject on calibration.
I would like to understand what should be done if measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate?
Regards
|
You should talk to the calibration service supplier and ask why MU information was not provided.
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
|

13th February 2007, 12:06 AM
|
|
Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Sep 2004
Location: India/Andhra pradesh/Tirupati
|
|
Posts: 19
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 22 Karma: 15 
|
|
Re: Measurement uncertainity is not mentioned in the calibration certificate
actually they are not provided any uncertainty results reg masters they are used and with the regular calibration certificate
If we insist them on to get uncertainty naa they will surely provide
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|