The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard > QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th January 1999, 10:59 PM
Bryon C Simmons
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question How many firms are third-party registered to TE (Tooling and Equipment) Supplement?

Hi, all

Not much activity in the TE front? If you recall, we went through TE registration about 2 weeks ago....have responded to Non-compliances, am awaiting word of acceptance...

How many firms are there already third-party registered to TE?

Feedback anyone?


Bryon
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 13th January 1999, 08:13 AM
mibusha
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Bryon,

We're having a pre-assessment tomorrow and Friday for TE by a third party auditor. I am a bit neervous because although we have cleaned up considerably there are many issues remaining that I am not so confident of passing. But what the heck-that's what a pre-assessment is for.

I'm curious as to what you did for SPC (4.20). We don't really have much to document. We use mostly proven technology with added extras such as welding systems or conveyors. Could you give me an idea of what you have in your procedures/documentation?

Thanks,
Michael
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 13th January 1999, 10:15 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Mike

Keep us informed about your pre-assessment. Who is your registrar?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13th January 1999, 11:03 AM
Bryon C Simmons
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Good luck to you in your pre-assessment......take the opportunity to "pick " your auditors brains a little....as far as the 4.20 thing goes, I called out analysis of various reliability measures, MTBF, MTTS, LCC, etc.....and then showed that we were doing some analysis of these measures to drive improvement. I did some analysis of LCC; gathered estimated production/labor/material costs, and did some comparisons with actual times, etc. I based our MTBF, and MTTR numbers on individual components testing, and then ran those failure rates into a system reliability formula (series vs. parallel systems) It worked out fairly well, and I was even surprised by some of the numbers I got back. We use this information to help drive process improvement........

I get the feeling that this TE thing is so new, that there will be some fumbling and groping by all parties concerned......if the numbers I hear about the sheer quantity of TE suppliers as opposed to production part suppliers to Detroit, this TE thing should be huge. I guess it will come down to customer mandate..........we shall see.

Keep us posted on your experiences.

Bryon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th January 1999, 06:54 AM
mibusha
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is long so read only if you are interested and have time!

Perry Johnson is our registrar (chosen before I joined the company). The auditors seemed to do a good job-and I did pick their brains (which were energized by our Thai food lunch).

There were 12 minor NCRs which will take all of 15 minutes each to correct (procedure clarifications, etc.). I'll do a summary of the majors-this is early morning and I don't have the standards in front of me but I'm sure you'll recognize the elements.

1) Internal audits-a stupid mistake on my part for writing in our procedures that we do monthly int audits (I meant just for a few months but... , and for not having an audit plan for this year. Easily fixable

2) Contingency plan-A failure on my part to address the issue properly. No clear plans for machine breakdown, power failure, or other emergencies. Fixable

3) Receiving Inspection-Uncontrolled access to crib, no non-conforming material log, lack of sufficient ID of received product. Reinstruction and procedural changes.

4) Material Storage-No control of access, no requisition procedures, lack of identification of product, insufficient organization. A major effort required here but I agree with their assessment totally.

5) Test Equipment-Using uncalibrated test equipment (torque sensers) in software lab. Easy fix for an otherwise fairly organized department.

6) Training-Employee training records not updated in two years! My records were not even there...A major oversight on my part (I trusted our administration department on this one...ouch! Fixable

7) Vendor Evaluation/Delivery-Using Vendors with a very poor record of on-time-delivery. Using vendors not approved by our own procedures. Will take time but easily fixable.

8) Hazardous Material-Contaminated Oil being stored (55 gal drums) 5 feet from receiving dock (dangerous situation), violation of EPA, OSHA, etc. Have to check on this. OSHA has never cited us but... .TBD

Overall nothing that will take too much time or money to fix. These and a few minor procedural clarifications will make us ready for another audit (perhaps one more pre?) then go for the gold. I am quite satisfied with our efforts. You shuda seen us at the start... !

Michael
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard > QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Capability in ISO/TS 16949 registered firms - No Special Characteristics Peters ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 27 5th May 2008 03:34 AM
Fate of T&E (Tooling and Equipment) supplement from QS 9000 Michael Walmsley Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2 7th March 2007 11:01 AM
OLD Standard Documentation QS-9000 & TE (Tooling and Equipment suppliers supplement) michelle8075 Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 12 5th April 2006 08:32 AM
Third Party registered to ISO 9001:2000 by an accredited third-party CB cheahga ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6 21st February 2006 03:07 AM
Tooling and Equipment Manufacturer (TE Supplement) Registration Audit Bryon C Simmons QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4 23rd December 1998 03:15 PM



The time now is 06:17 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts