The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > The Reading Room > Registered Visitor Articles Archive


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd March 2007, 03:34 AM
Wong Wai Loong Wong Wai Loong is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2007
Location: Malaysia
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 12
Karma: 10
Wong Wai Loong has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Measuring production performance - Defect Detection % vs. Internal Reject

Hello every body ,

I just joint the forum and I have some question need somebody help and share some idea. As a QA engineer is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate production performance.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 3rd March 2007, 11:42 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
 
Posts: 9,204
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,290 Times in 1,544 Posts
Karma Power: 611
Karma: 20365
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate prod perform

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wong Wai Loong View Post

Hello every body ,

I just joint the forum and I have some question need somebody help and share some idea. As a QA engineer is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate production performance.
Welcome, WWL

It seems that you would have to know the former in order to know the latter, no? It further seems that a defect detection percentage might be a measure of inspection efficacy rather than production performance, because if we assume that some defects aren't detected, and you depend on detection to catch defects, then your detection methods might be lacking somehow. How do you define "production performance"?
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 5th March 2007, 12:56 AM
fireonce's Avatar
fireonce fireonce is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Dec 2006
 
Posts: 190
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 120
fireonce is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.fireonce is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default Re: Is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate prod perform

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wong Wai Loong View Post

Hello every body ,

I just joint the forum and I have some question need somebody help and share some idea. As a QA engineer is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate production performance.
I prefer to use the Defect Detection %,but I suggest you choose the method according to the specific of your products.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th March 2007, 10:15 AM
sal881vw sal881vw is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: Malta GC Europe
Age: 56
 
Posts: 150
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 34
Karma: 389
sal881vw is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.sal881vw is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.sal881vw is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.sal881vw is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Default Re: Is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate prod perform

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wong Wai Loong View Post

Hello every body ,

I just joint the forum and I have some question need somebody help and share some idea. As a QA engineer is it use the Defect Detection % rather that internal reject to rate production performance.
I would use both, if they are key performance indicators especially if the message you want to get across is continuous improvement. Just ensure to get the message across clear enough in a way that, it is effective and adds value.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31st March 2007, 03:11 AM
sushant_kulkarni sushant_kulkarni is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Jul 2006
Location: india
Age: 30
 
Posts: 58
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 15
Karma: 15
sushant_kulkarni has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: Measuring production performance - Defect Detection % vs. Internal Reject

It should definaltly interconnected.

THey are inversly praportional to each other if detection is higher then % rejection automatically less.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > The Reading Room > Registered Visitor Articles Archive

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
7.6.3 Internal or External Laboratory? Measuring instruments used in production Peters ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9 4th September 2009 03:52 PM
Control Chart CpK dilemma - Defect Per Unit data on a single production line sbickley Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 16 19th June 2009 08:32 AM
Internal threads - Maximum / Minor accept/reject diameter inspection leetimothyj Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 6 8th March 2007 04:29 PM
What Process will ensure defect detection? behoops Nonconformance and Corrective Action 12 3rd March 2007 12:07 AM
Customer Returns/External Reject Rate - Seeking world class performance benchmark SteelMaiden ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 2 23rd January 2006 11:17 AM



The time now is 06:28 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts