The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th January 2000, 05:03 PM
Dan De Yarman
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Is it acceptable to use a checklist for inspection of machined parts from supplier?

Is it acceptable to use a checklist for inspection of machined parts coming from subcontractors? The checklist would have the job number, part number, quantity, date, and revision level. The revision level would be that of the drawing, to which the detail was inspected against.

I don't think we would receive very many inspection records from our subcontractors. Many of them don't have the resources needed to have someone fill out inspection reports; although we do have one that does it already on their own. That is why I am asking if this is acceptable.

Another possibility might be for us to have a standard inspection form and send it out with the work. That way all the subcontractor has to do is fill out the form and send it back with the finished part.

What does everybody think? I would much prefer to go with the first one (lack of storage for the inspections records otherwise).

Dan
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 28th January 2000, 11:25 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Lurker

I don't see a problem with a check list approach. the question is where the items on the check list come from.

Remember, you decide what, if any, inspections and tests have to be made. They can be extensive (product for space shuttle) or minimal (visual of injection molded toy soldiers).
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 28th January 2000, 11:48 AM
Tom Goetzinger Tom Goetzinger is offline
An Early Cover

Registration Date: Mar 1999
Location: Milwaukee, WI USA
 
Posts: 122
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 25
Tom Goetzinger has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Are you performing incoming inspection on the parts? If so, your inspection records should provide all the information you need.
If you are not performing incoming inspection, you may need to validate that you are getting good parts from your suppliers. This can be done by certifying your suppliers.
Another approach might be to objectively prove that you have historically been getting good parts (no evidence of extra cost or late delivery due to poor purchased part quality) and have a method in place to catch if that changes, so that you can "nip the problem in the bud" so to speak.
This will be harder to sell to your auditor, but if the evidence is there, they should accept it.
Remember in everything you do, if it honestly doesn't make good business sense for your business, do you really have to do it; can you provide evidence that you are not aversly affecting your customers by not doing it? If you can, document the fact that you are not, and go on.
Of course, as always, this is IMHO only.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Help with PPAP Level 3 for a small company! Machined parts ekonom APQP and PPAP 5 12th November 2009 01:56 PM
Calibration required? We buy part of our machined parts - Supplier gage calibration? svance ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 21st February 2007 02:18 PM
Is "rounding" acceptable when measuring parts? Tolerance Limits - What is acceptable? David Bear Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 36 3rd November 2006 04:14 PM
Example - PFMEA for Machined Parts on CNC Mills & Lathes MTECD FMEA and Control Plans 3 11th October 2006 11:14 AM
Return to Vendor processes - Supplier parts which fail incoming inspection TNHunter Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2 7th March 2006 03:24 PM



The time now is 07:09 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts