The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th March 2007, 12:49 PM
jacko jacko is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA Tennessee
 
Posts: 11
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 40
jacko has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Reliability from Warranty data - We do not know the date put in service

I recently had a concern brought to my attention on some analysis that I want to implement.
We receive a warranty report, and I wanted to use Weibull analysis to compare failure date to date manufactured. The problem that was posed to me is the fact that product goes to a warehouse, and we do not know the date put in service. How can we relate to a MTTF analysis? Will this give us false data? Can we actually know what the MTTF is if we do not know how long the unit is in operation?

Are there any thoughts on how I can utilize this data?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 30th March 2007, 02:30 PM
Miner's Avatar
Miner Miner is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
 
Posts: 1,840
Thanks Given to Others: 166
Thanked 670 Times in 457 Posts
Blog Entries: 9
Karma Power: 251
Karma: 9207
Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Miner is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Reliability from Warranty data - We do not know the date put in service

I cannot help you on handling this through Weibull analysis, but you may want to consider nonparametric methods described below.

Check out:
ASQ Reliability Review
Could Firestone Have Known?
and www.fieldreliability.com

If you have sufficient data available on infant mortality failures, you can create a distribution for the time between date of manufacture and date put into service. If needed, you can then back this out in the analysis. I have used the techniques described by Larry George in the referenced links and have been pleased with the results. Known issues with specific manufacturing periods stand out clearly in the analysis.
__________________
"A fool can learn from his own experiences; the wise learn from the experience of others." - Democritus, 460-370 B.C.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 30th March 2007, 02:39 PM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne Jim Wynne is online now
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
 
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,298 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
Karma: 20405
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Jim Wynne is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Reliability from Warranty data - We do not know the date put in service

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacko View Post

I recently had a concern brought to my attention on some analysis that I want to implement.
We receive a warranty report, and I wanted to use Weibull analysis to compare failure date to date manufactured. The problem that was posed to me is the fact that product goes to a warehouse, and we do not know the date put in service. How can we relate to a MTTF analysis? Will this give us false data? Can we actually know what the MTTF is if we do not know how long the unit is in operation?

Are there any thoughts on how I can utilize this data?
Miner's good advice notwithstanding, you seem to be asking two different questions. Are you concerned with comparing date of failure to date of manufacture, as in your second sentence, or failure date with date-in-service, as in your third? If this relates to warranty claims, what you might need to be comparing is date of failure vs. the date when the warranty clock starts ticking. What are you trying to analyze?
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th March 2007, 05:48 PM
jacko jacko is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA Tennessee
 
Posts: 11
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 40
jacko has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: Reliability from Warranty data - We do not know the date put in service

sorry for being somewhat vague.
The concern is the fact that if I collect warranty data, we do not the actual time that the units were in operation, since we only have production date information and failure date information.
i.e.,
if we produce a unit that sits in a warehouse for 2 or 3 months, then is put into operation and fails after 6 mos. we would incorrectly assume that it failed after 8 or 9 months instead of 6 mos.
My question is whether this can be accounted for, or is this even a valid concern?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd April 2007, 01:50 PM
Michael Walmsley Michael Walmsley is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Dec 2005
Location: US
 
Posts: 158
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 6 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 810
Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Michael Walmsley is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default Re: Reliability from Warranty data - We do not know the date put in service

Yes, you should account for it AND it is a valid concern.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Example of a Service / Warranty report form chascoffin Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3 30th October 2008 10:30 AM
Never put an Expiration (Due) Date on a Calibration Certificate Wayne Calibration Frequency (Interval) 41 27th August 2008 11:42 PM
Warranty - Is Warranty a Service or not per ISO 9001 nharris840 Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 20 30th May 2008 11:23 AM
Failure Data of Cathode Stripping Machines - Reliability from the data attached alokb Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 7 29th March 2007 09:26 AM
SOP Dates - What to put in for the Start of Production date on engineering changes Teri ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2 23rd September 2004 10:20 AM



The time now is 10:47 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts