The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > Customer and Company Specific Requirements


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th March 1999, 03:40 PM
Linda Jurasin Linda Jurasin is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Jun 1998
Location: Amherst, Ohio USA
 
Posts: 16
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 47
Karma: 10
Linda Jurasin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Ford Q1 vs. QOS vs. QS-9000's TE Supplement - Will Ford want anything else?

The company I work for is preparing for QS9000 with Tooling & Equipment Supplement. From some of the classes I have attended, I was told that if our company is QS9000 with T/E then we are automatically Q1. Is this true? Also, please explain the difference between Ford's Q1 and QOS. Based on your answer/explanation, when my company becomes registered to QS9000 with T/E, will we need to do anything different for Ford? Thanks in advance for your help.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 15th March 1999, 05:05 PM
Bryon C Simmons
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hmmm, well, good questions, Linda. Having just been through the TE registration process, AND Q1 status with Ford, the campaign is still fresh in my mind. Let me see if I can shed some light here, (or maybe further muddy the waters..)

First of all, you are to be commended for doing QS and TE..these are daunting tasks, and require alot of time, effort and patience......

Becoming QS-9000 and TE does NOT automatically make you a Q1 supplier. Ford will initiate that themselves, if they want you to participate in the Q1 program. You have to be a long-term, preferred supplier to Ford, in order to be considered for the Q1 program. The company I work for, is considered a TE supplier by Ford, (non-production parts). Part of the Q1 requirements for TE suppliers is COMPLIANCE to certain elements of the TE Supplement..note I did not say "registration". Basically, the R&M elements have to be implemented for the products that you sell to Ford. There is a system of customer endorsements, and a "grading scale", that you must satisfy, based on your performance, to be considered for Q1. My company made an internal decision to do full registration to TE, not simply compliance.

Part of the Q1 criteria is the development of an ISO-9001 system, (this you MUST be third-party registered to for Ford, by the way). If you are implementing QS-9000, look in the back of the QS manual, to the Ford specific requirements. There, you will see a "shall" for implementing a QOS. QOS= Quality Operating System". BAsically, this is a system of internal and external business and performance measurements, i.e. PPM, OTD, and whatever else is important to your business. You need to set goals, and show progress towards them, etc. If you are doing QS, you will satisfy the intent of a QOS through your QS-9000 measurable systems. i.e. PPM analysis, COQ, OTD, etc.

My suggestion for you would be to read and understand the Ford-specific requirements that are spelled out in the QS-9000 manual. In addition for the requirement for a QOS, is the need to utilize Ford's version of the AIAG APQP manual. It is called" FAO Advanced Product Quality Planning Status Reporting Guideline". If you are not familiar with this document, let me know, and I will get you a phone number to get it from, along with lots of other Ford stuff....Q1 info, QOS info, etc.

Again, being QS-9000 and TE compliant does NOT automatically make you a Q1 supplier, but it will satisfy the vast majority of the requirements. If you are doing alot of work for Ford, contact your STA there, and ask him about Q1. Ford is "revitalizing" Q1, and you will see more and more about it in the months to come.

Let me know if you have more qestions.

Bryon

Good luck with your QS/TE efforts.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 16th March 1999, 09:11 AM
Linda Jurasin Linda Jurasin is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Jun 1998
Location: Amherst, Ohio USA
 
Posts: 16
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 47
Karma: 10
Linda Jurasin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Bryon,

Since we design manufacture & market automated systems that apply adhesives, sealants & coatings to consumer & industrial products, some of the Ford -Specific requirements do not apply. We have been selling equipment to Ford for a number of years but to the best of my knowledge have not received any type of Q1 rating in the past.

No, I am not familar with Ford's version of AIAG APQP manual. Please provide the phone number regarding FAO Advanced Product Quality Planning Status, Q1 and QOS.

Thanks for everything, I appreciate your help & information .

Linda

------------------
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th March 1999, 02:24 PM
Bryon C Simmons
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry about the delay in responding..I have been quite busy of late.

Ok, phone number for Ford APQP book

(248) 398-7900

For the QOS information..there is a book out there called the QOS primer.....very helpful. Itis available from

Ford Motor Quality Publications
c/o edcor Data Services
P.O. Box 9079
Farmington Hills, MI. 48333
Phone (248) 626-3077

THey should also have some information about Q1 criteria also.

Hope this helps.

Bryon

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th March 1999, 12:08 PM
Dan Indish
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is the NEW Ford Q1 process (as of 7/24/98).
1) Provide copy of ISO Scope (to be sent with petition)
2) Provide copy of recent ISO audit summary and recommendations (to be sent with petition)
3) Include Reliability & Maintainability Section in Quality Manual (to be sent with petition)
4) Include Equipment Prove Out Section in Quality Manual (to be sent with petition)
5) ISO auditor should comment on R&M and Equipment Proveout Procedures
6) Quality Manual should specify that it complies with the 7 Categories of Ford Q1 Quality Operating System (QOS) requirements below (Communication, Teamwork, Management
Review, Measureables, Qualifying Tools, Continual Improvement, Dynamic Process):
a) Communication
i) Employees at all levels are aware of the FORD Q1 (QOS) process. NOTE: "Constant" awareness is recommended).
ii) Senior management has communicated clear expectations of the FORD Q1 (QOS) process.
iii) On-going performance is communicated regularly.
iv) The FORD Q1 (QOS) methodology has been communicated to the supply base, if
applicable.
b) Teamwork
i) A champion is identified for each measurable and is actively involved with teams.
ii) Teams are allocated resources to function effectively. (NOTE: Monthly meetings are recommended).
iii) Cross-functional problem solving and quality improvement teams have been established to work on opportunities identified by the FORD Q1 (QOS) process.
c) Management Review
i) Regular scheduled reviews are held.
ii) Evidence exists to support the FORD Q1 (QOS) process.
iii) On-going performance is tracked.
iv) Status of action plans and problem solving activities are reviewed.
d) Measurables
i) Internal and external Customer expectations are identified.
ii) Selected measurables relate to key processes and predict internal and external Customer satisfaction.
iii) Measurables for quality and delivery to Ford are established. (Note: this is not part of the Ford Q1 QOS Assessment form, but is part of the Endorsee process).
e) Qualifying Tools
i) Performance analysis over time used.
ii) Performance targets identified.
iii) Problem prioritization used.
iv) Structured problem solving used.
f) Continual Improvement
i) The FORD Q1 (QOS) process provides examples of quantifiable improvements which are significant and sustainable.
ii) Improvement trends correlate to measurables of internal and external Customer satisfaction.
g) Dynamic Process
i) Senior management champions the FORD Q1 (QOS) process and ensures its on-going
effectiveness.
ii) Periodic contact is made with internal and external Customers to verify or update expectations.
iii) Periodic reviews of key processes and measurables are made to ensure their continued suitability and effectiveness.
7) ISO auditor should comment on the compliance to Ford Q1 QOS
8) Obtain 3-10 endorsements (Plant Engineering or Manufacturing Manager) from Key Ford Customers, with new business within the last 24 months, as determined by the Ford Buyer
9) Ford Endorsees must score Q1 applicant 10 or more points out 15 possible points on these 5 Critical Questions:
a) Timing - Was the product delivered according to schedule?
b) Quality - Does the product meet the performance criteria (uptime, Cpk, Ppk)?
c) Quality - Did applicant provide adequate R&M data and (evidence of) and ongoing improvement program?
d) Cost - Did the product cost meet Ford objectives?
e) Installation Performance - Did applicant provide adequate service or support?
10) Ford Endorsees must score applicant on these 6 categories of the Supplier Performance Rating
(Timing, Quality, Cost, Program Management, Installation Performance, Performance of
Sub-Contractors):
a) Timing
i) Were design approvals submitted on time?
ii) Was the product delivered according to the agreed schedule (Critical Question #1)
iii) Was the product commissioned or runoff in appropriate time?
b) Quality
i) Does the product comply with Engineering specifications or standards?
ii) Does the product meet the performance criteria (uptime, Cpk, Ppk)? (Critical Question #2)
iii) Did the Supplier provide adequate R&M data and (evidence of) and ongoing
improvement program? (Critical Question #3)
iv) Did the Supplier effectively participate in Advanced Quality Planning?
c) Cost
i) Did the Supplier willing participate in cost improvement programs (SE, VA/VE)?
ii) Did the product cost meet Ford objectives? (Critical Question #4)
iii) Do you believe Engineering and process changes were fairly priced?
iv) Did the Supplier effectively manage Engineering changes?
d) Program Management
i) Did the Supplier provide adequate open communication and competent program
management skills?
e) Installation Performance
i) Did the Supplier provide adequate service or support? (Critical Question #5)
ii) Did the Supplier's Field Supervision ensure specified equipment or product functionality in time?
iii) Was the appropriate documentation, manuals & drawings on time?
iv) Was a recommended spares list available after commissioning?
v) Did the Supplier provide adequate training?
f) Performance of Sub-contractors
i) Did the sub-contractors (under applicant direction) perform to an acceptable standard?
11) Additional requirement for TE Suppliers - Obtain GREEN R&M status by 12/31/99 per RED-YELLOW-GREEN Report created by Hal Raffa of Ford Machinery and Tooling.
###
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th August 2001, 02:46 AM
mirzad
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Look!

our company prepare for Ford APQP
i would like to have some information or refernce about CRAFTSMANSHIP.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > Customer and Company Specific Requirements

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
TE Suppliers vs. Ford QOS John Swartz QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 0 8th August 2002 10:57 AM
Ford, QOS and QS9000 Roger Eastin QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 3 5th October 2001 04:18 PM
Ford QOS (Quality Operating System) Daniel J. Rupright QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 2 24th May 2000 06:33 PM
Ford QOS - Where to buy documents Daniel J. Rupright Customer and Company Specific Requirements 1 3rd May 2000 12:37 AM
Ford QOS - 3rd Party Auditing body able to assess the QOS Assessment? Martin T QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1 17th February 2000 01:37 AM



The time now is 03:00 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts