|
|
 |

10th January 2000, 10:41 PM
|
|
|
How to develop an Equipment / Machinery FMEA - Remember the key word: Predictive
How to develop a FMEA for equipment? Is it a process FMEA or product FMEA? or even concept FMEA and service FMEA? Is it related to reliability of the equipment or quality of the equipment? What is the difference?
|

11th January 2000, 04:47 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
There are many, many types of FMEAs - for excample see Containment FMEA and GP-12 (GM procedure for early production containment) - all are essentially the same in format. The AIAG has their 'versions' for automotive but even if you look at a process FMEA - some folks use (as an example) a 1 to 5 rating system (the AIAG uses 1 to 10).
I suggest you see the FMEA files in the pdf_files directory. As I remember there's some info on equipment FMEAs there.
|

12th January 2000, 06:39 PM
|
|
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
|
|
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 40 
|
|
|
I took a hit for predictive maintenace during assessment, and quite frankly my fix isn't turning out like I thought it would. I'm not sure anymore that it is a fix. I saw an article in Qality Progress on maintenance FMEA's and I was very impressed. My question is: Will it cover me come surveillance time on predictive maintenance. Does it meet the shall? I think it does, but you know what... I thought that before.
Thanks for any insight, Dawn
|

12th January 2000, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dawn:
I took a hit for predictive maintenace during assessment, and quite frankly my fix isn't turning out like I thought it would. I'm not sure anymore that it is a fix.
|
Predictive maintenance is a hummer. There is a lot of opinion here. Do you have to do spectro analysis of oil of every machine (for example).
First, remember this is a QS9000 requirement (see 4.9.g.1). They do not list maintenance / equipment FMEAs, however I suppose you could cite same.
--> SUM Predictive maintenance methods - These methods should include a
--> review of appropriate items such as the manufacturer's
--> recommendations, tool wear, optimization of uptime, correlation of
--> SPC data to prevent maintenance activities, important
--> characteristics of perishable tooling, fluid analysis, infrared
--> monitoring of circuits and vibration analysis...
I have seen companies use their maintenance database to 'predict' problems. Ask your self how you decide what 'spares' to keep onsite and what equipment is critical to operations. For example, if you have a 'critical' machine, can you discuss possible breakdowns and how you will handle it? Do you have any extra motors on hand? Do you NEED to have extra motors on hand? When I go through a client facility I spend a bit of time asking about the spare machine and facility parts they have on hand. How did they decide to stock in-house what they have?
In the semiconductor industry I have seen more esoteric stuff like fluid analysis and such. I have never seen infrared monitoring of circuit cards. I have seen vibration analysis.
Remember the key word: Predictive
|

14th August 2005, 05:08 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Singapore
|
|
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
Equipment FMEA
Can someone help me to have a set of quiz questions on DFMEA, PFMEA and Equipment FMEA for self evaluations?
Thanks.
L. Govindan
Singapore
|

15th August 2005, 03:29 PM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
|
|
Posts: 1,840
Thanks Given to Others: 166
Thanked 670 Times in 457 Posts
Karma Power: 251
|
|
The Equipment FMEA is a specific version of FMEA. While the methodology is the same as any FMEA, the intent is different. See Quality Progress 1999 for the article "Old Tools - New Uses: Equipment FMEA".
|
|
Thanks to Miner for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

16th August 2005, 05:48 PM
|
|
$ Contributor
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: GTA
|
|
Posts: 63
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 39
|
|
Machinery FMEA
The AIAG does in fact publish a special guide called
"Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for Tooling and Equipment:" Machinery FMEA
It doesn't differ in the way in which the FMEAS are structured or analysed, but the severity evaluation is more conducive to machinery than to a part or product.
This manual can be ordered from the AIAG.
|

16th August 2005, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
Thanks for the heads up on the AIAG's Machinery FMEA manual. I wasn't aware of that one.
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|