|
|
 |
|

23rd June 2000, 07:42 PM
|
|
|
PFMEA - Is having the DFMEA An Absolute Requirement when doing a PFMEA
I understand the desirability and importance of having the DFMEA on hand when preparing a PFMEA. However, is it an absolute requirement? Can you reasonably expect to be able to complete a PFMEA without access to the design?
IMHO, since design changes are not meant as fixes for PFMEAs, all is not lost just because we don't have a design.
What say you all
|

24th June 2000, 07:14 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Nope - the requirement is not 'absolute'. Many times a non-design responsible supplier cannot get a DFMEA from their customer.
|

25th June 2000, 06:59 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Karma Power: 195
|
|
|
I would say most times the DFMEA is not available.
|

25th June 2000, 08:10 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
You're right. I was being overly optimistic using the word 'many' instead of 'most'.
|

25th June 2000, 03:03 PM
|
|
|
Thank you!!
|

15th August 2004, 08:38 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Karma Power: 195
|
|
Has anything changed in the last 4 years?
__________________
You can’t fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
* William S. Burroughs
|

15th August 2004, 07:14 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
You know, when I saw the title of this thread I was thinking about that, Howard. I was doing an APQP overview the other day and I was going through the 'Reality' vs. 'Theory' aspect. These folks are not design responsible. In these situations I try to explain that the APQP manual is theory and, as my 'standard' example, I cited the fact that most suppliers have a 'snowball's chance in hades' of getting a customer's DFMEA.
I say it's still true. Was last in the 'trenches' as a QE from April 2002 through May 2003 and it was true then with the two customers (I was 'dedicated' to Harley-Davidson and Visteon) I 'worked' with.
Nothing has changed.
|

16th August 2004, 10:27 AM
|
 |
Dogs rule
Registration Date: Jul 2002
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 56
|
|
Posts: 980
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 69
|
|
I agree - Nothing has changed. From my view, I wonder if a "big" reason is that my customers perform a DFMEA on their assembled part and don't dive down to the component level (which is what we supply). I have gotten two DFMEAs from two different customers over the last 7 years and I really had to hunt to find references to our component.
__________________
There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face. - Ben Williams
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|