The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th May 2007, 06:19 AM
temujin's Avatar
temujin temujin is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Europa
 
Posts: 162
Thanks Given to Others: 44
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 25
Karma: 566
temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Please Help! European MDD Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Dear Forum,

I have a question as to how to interpret the European MDD concerning
the classification of Medical Devices.

If a diagnostic device is both active AND surgically invasive,
which rule apply?

My advisor says as long as the device is active, the rules concerning
surgically invasive devices do not apply (!) even though the device would
have been in a higher risk class if the rules concerning surgically
invasive devises were considered.
Is this the current practice?

regards
temu
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 18th May 2007, 06:29 AM
Gert Sorensen's Avatar
Gert Sorensen Gert Sorensen is offline
QA Systems Coordinator

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 42
 
Posts: 720
Thanks Given to Others: 327
Thanked 224 Times in 134 Posts
Karma Power: 73
Karma: 2221
Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Quote:
Originally Posted by temujin View Post

I have a question as to how to interpret the European MDD concerning
the classification of Medical Devices.

If a diagnostic device is both active AND surgically invasive,
which rule apply?

My advisor says as long as the device is active, the rules concerning
surgically invasive devices do not apply (!) even though the device would
have been in a higher risk class if the rules concerning surgically
invasive devises were considered.
Is this the current practice?
Hi Temu, and welcome to the Cove.

I do not interpret the MDD the same way as your advisor. The classification rules state:

CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA I. DEFINITIONS 1. Definitions for the classification rules

1.1. Duration

Transient

Normally intended for continuous use for less than 60 minutes.

Short term

Normally intended for continuous use for not more than 30 days.

Long term

Normally intended for continuous use for more than 30 days.

1.2. Invasive devices

Invasive device

A device which, in whole or in part, penetrates inside the body, either through a body orifice or through the surface of the body.

Body orifice

Any natural opening in the body, as well as the external surface of the eyeball, or any permanent artificial opening, such as a stoma.

Surgically invasive device

An invasive device which penetrates inside the body through the surface of the body, with the aid or in the context of a surgical operation.

For the purposes of this Directive devices other than those referred to in the previous subparagraph and which produce penetration other than through an established body orifice, shall be treated as surgically invasive devices.

Implantable device

Any device which is intended:

- to be totally introduced into the human body or,

- to replace an epithelial surface or the surface of the eye,

by surgical intervention which is intended to remain in place after the procedure.

Any device intended to be partially introduced into the human body through surgical intervention and intended to remain in place after the procedure for at least 30 days is also considered an implantable device.

1.3. Reusable surgical instrument

Instrument intended for surgical use by cutting, drilling, sawing, scratching, scraping, clamping, retracting, clipping or similar procedures, without connection to any active medical device and which can be reused after appropriate procedures have been carried out.

1.4. Active medical device

Any medical device operation of which depends on a source of electrical energy or any source of power other than that directly generated by the human body or gravity and which acts by converting this energy. Medical devices intended to transmit energy, substances or other elements between an active medical device and the patient, without any significant change, are not considered to be active medical devices.

1.5. Active therapeutical device

Any active medical device, whether used alone or in combination with other medical devices, to support, modify, replace or restore biological functions or structures with a view to treatment or alleviation of an illness, injury or handicap.

1.6. Active device for diagnosis

Any active medical device, whether used alone or in combination with other medical devices, to supply information for detecting, diagnosing, monitoring or treating physiological conditions, states of health, illnesses or congenital deformities.

1.7. Central circulatory system

For the purposes of this Directive, 'central circulatory system' means the following vessels:

arteriae pulmonales, aorta ascendens, arteriae coronariae, arteria carotis communis, arteria carotis externa, arteria carotis interna, arteriae cerebrales, truncus brachicephalicus, venae cordis, venae pulmonales, vena cava superior, vena cava inferior.

1.8. Central nervous system

For the purposes of this Directive, 'central nervous system' means brain, meninges and spinal cord.

II. IMPLEMENTING RULES 2. Implementing rules

2.1. Application of the classification rules shall be governed by the intended purpose of the devices.

2.2. If the device is intended to be used in combination with another device, the classification rules shall apply separately to each of the devices. Accessories are classified in their own right separately from the device with which they are used.

2.3. Software, which drives a device or influences the use of a device, falls automatically in the same class.

2.4. If the device is not intended to be used solely or principally in a specific part of the body, it must be considered and classified on the basis of the most critical specified use.

2.5. If several rules apply to the same device, based on the performance specified for the device by the manufacturer, the strictest rules resulting in the higher classification shall apply.


As you can see in 2.4 and 2.5, the strictest rule apply. This i basic good sense, since it would be easy to classify your product in a category that does not reflect the risk involved in the use, if you could choose freely.

__________________
Beetle Bailey Rules!
Reply With Quote
Thank You to Gert Sorensen for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 18th May 2007, 07:16 AM
temujin's Avatar
temujin temujin is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Europa
 
Posts: 162
Thanks Given to Others: 44
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 25
Karma: 566
temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Thanks Gerd,... that was my own interpretation as well.

However, my "advisor" claims that the current practice by Notified Bodies is that as long as a device is active only the "active" rules are to be applied. I have not seen any examples of this current practice.
Moreover, he claims that Annex 9/ Rule 7 (on surgically invasive devices) is only about PASSIVE invasive devices.

Do you or anyone else have any examples of other active, surgically invasive devices for short term use (that would get the Class III classification)?


regards
temu
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th May 2007, 07:50 AM
Gert Sorensen's Avatar
Gert Sorensen Gert Sorensen is offline
QA Systems Coordinator

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 42
 
Posts: 720
Thanks Given to Others: 327
Thanked 224 Times in 134 Posts
Karma Power: 73
Karma: 2221
Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Quote:
Originally Posted by temujin View Post

Thanks Gerd,... that was my own interpretation as well.

However, my "advisor" claims that the current practice by Notified Bodies is that as long as a device is active only the "active" rules are to be applied. I have not seen any examples of this current practice.
Moreover, he claims that Annex 9/ Rule 7 (on surgically invasive devices) is only about PASSIVE invasive devices.

Do you or anyone else have any examples of other active, surgically invasive devices for short term use (that would get the Class III classification)?


regards
temu
Can you elaborate on the type of device you are producing?
__________________
Beetle Bailey Rules!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th May 2007, 08:00 AM
temujin's Avatar
temujin temujin is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Europa
 
Posts: 162
Thanks Given to Others: 44
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 25
Karma: 566
temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

a system (ultrasound) with a probe for measuring coronar flow on an open heart.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th May 2007, 08:18 AM
Gert Sorensen's Avatar
Gert Sorensen Gert Sorensen is offline
QA Systems Coordinator

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 42
 
Posts: 720
Thanks Given to Others: 327
Thanked 224 Times in 134 Posts
Karma Power: 73
Karma: 2221
Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Quote:
Originally Posted by temujin View Post

a system (ultrasound) with a probe for measuring coronar flow on an open heart.
If I understand you correctly, the probe is inserted in the coronary system and generates a signal that is transmitted to some sort of monitoringsystem? Where does the probe go?
__________________
Beetle Bailey Rules!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18th May 2007, 08:31 AM
temujin's Avatar
temujin temujin is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Europa
 
Posts: 162
Thanks Given to Others: 44
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 25
Karma: 566
temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.temujin is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Yep,

1 end of the probe is connected to the coronary artery (ies)
2 end of probe is connected to an ultrasound scanner.

temu
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18th May 2007, 08:43 AM
Gert Sorensen's Avatar
Gert Sorensen Gert Sorensen is offline
QA Systems Coordinator

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Age: 42
 
Posts: 720
Thanks Given to Others: 327
Thanked 224 Times in 134 Posts
Karma Power: 73
Karma: 2221
Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Gert Sorensen is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Classification of Medical Devices (Risk Class)

Quote:
Originally Posted by temujin View Post

Yep,

1 end of the probe is connected to the coronary artery (ies)
2 end of probe is connected to an ultrasound scanner.

temu
If I produced something that went into the coronary artery, then I would not have any doubt whatsoever, that I would have to apply the highest risk.
__________________
Beetle Bailey Rules!
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Gert Sorensen for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > National and International Business Standards > CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Technical File Review to updated MDD 93/42/EC (Class II medical devices) SteveK CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3 29th July 2009 05:09 AM
Multisite CE certificate - Class IIB medical devices per MDD Annex 2 somashekar CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4 28th July 2009 02:20 PM
Containment Device Classification - Class I Medical Device via Rule 1 MDD Annex IX leroybrown CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1 17th July 2009 10:23 PM
Calculating Basic Risk/ Basic on Risk Analysis - Medical device MDD Class II and up temujin ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 8 23rd May 2007 06:54 PM
CE Mark requirements for Class IIA MDs - European medical devices importers ODISSEAS CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 6 28th February 2007 01:29 PM



The time now is 07:21 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts