The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th October 2000, 11:19 AM
Daniel
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Must we have FMEA for ALL the products by the registration audit?

Hi.

My company is in the process of implementing QS 9000 and FMEA is currently one of our biggest headaches. By nature of our products, it is almost impossible to implement FMEA for all of them by the certification audit. Can we set up a FMEA implementation master and at least complete a few of the product FMEA? Will this be acceptable to the QS 9000 auditors? Must we have FMEA for ALL the products by the audit?

Please advise.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 4th October 2000, 11:34 AM
Don Watt
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Would it be possible for you to group products in "families" and then to develop FMEA's to cover a range of products?

If you can do this it should save you a considerable amount of time & effort.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 4th October 2000, 03:42 PM
auditor16949
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
I would suggest you talk to the registrar to establish their policy and to your customers.
If I were carrying out the audit, I would be looking for evidence that your current APQP system works and is generating FMEAs so I would audit a current project. It might be acceptable to establish a breakpoint, jobs created after a certain date have an FMEA, those before don't.
Will your customer give you a waiver?
How did you gained PPAP approval without FMEAs?
If you don't currently have QS-9000 customers and your existing customers have not required FMEAs then generating historic data may not be necessary.
If you do need FMEAs, I would support the advice given by others to create generic documents if possible, this will undoubtedly be the quickest way.
Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th October 2000, 01:43 AM
Kevin Mader's Avatar
Kevin Mader Kevin Mader is offline
One of THE Original Covers!

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
Karma: 1335
Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Mader
Follow Don's advice. Additionally, you might want to address specific processes individually. You will inevitably reduce the redundancy of effort by doing both.

Regards,

Kevin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Design FMEA (DFMEA) required on all products and their parts? purushoth_dgstl Design and Development - Process and Product 5 21st April 2009 01:26 PM
Internal Audit Plan - Seperate audit plans for system, process, and for products Hamed ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 29th June 2008 11:04 PM
Changing the Registration Scope - No More Automotive Products - TS 16949 abd_sg ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1 9th March 2008 12:50 PM
APQP documents for aerospace products - Looking for examples - Process Map, FMEA, etc wes wiszniewski Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5 14th September 2005 01:32 AM
In ISO 9001:2000 Can We Exclude Some Customers and Products from our registration? qualitytrec ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 25 2nd September 2004 04:49 PM



The time now is 09:59 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts