The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th December 2000, 01:00 AM
sima
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question FMEA-RECOMENDED ACTION

Hello every body , who can answer this question: If you are a supplier for an Automobile manufacturing plant to prepare a new design and your final product is a vehicle prototype with all design document( DFMEA/ Prototype Control plan, caddata, 2d&3d drawing, ...) when should recomend an action to reduce the risk. suppose that you prepared the 1/1 model of design and you are suppose to start parts and system design , you prepared DFMEA documents for new design and complete the form up to RPN,but you didn't fill any recomended action. Is it acceptable that you should wait until prototype will be completed and when you see the problem then you will recomend some action is it an acceptable way according to standard . I think we must recomend corective action for high risk failure whenever we issue the FMEA documents and we shouldn't wait until preparing prototype ,although we can revise the DFMEA documents whenever it is necessary . I don't Know if my Idea is correct or not and I don't have any teoreticall base. Please help me to solve this problem
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 19th December 2000, 03:36 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

As I understand it, in a DFMEA a prototype is typically a (or part of a) recommended action just as testing is. Do you use the prototype for testing purposes?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 12th January 2001, 04:00 PM
J.R. Strickland
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Sima,

The recommended action from a DFMEA should be incorporated into the design as it is identified during the FMEA process. You certainly do not have to wait until you make a prototype to take the action. In fact, most car companies would rather you incorporated the recommended actions into the prototype prior to sending to them or submitting for testing, especially for high risk items or ones that affect special characteristics. The earlier in the APQP process you fix a potential design issue, the better off you will be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
FMEA Evolution: What Happens to Recommended Actions? Bill Ryan FMEA and Control Plans 5 9th November 2008 10:50 PM
FMEA - Should a severity of 9 or 10 be always followed by recommended actions? luciano FMEA and Control Plans 2 16th July 2008 02:01 AM
Corrective Actions Priority - Process FMEA (PFMEA) RPN Limits - Recommended Actions brutas FMEA and Control Plans 20 1st October 2006 08:12 AM
FMEA recommended actions column - What to do after actions are complete? Andrews FMEA and Control Plans 15 11th October 2005 02:15 AM
Core Tools - PFMEA - Not having the word ''NONE'' in Recommended Actions larry hopperrath FMEA and Control Plans 10 19th November 2004 04:43 PM



The time now is 05:38 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts