The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard > QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th January 1999, 08:15 PM
Robert Raymond
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Laboratory Scope - Research and Development Labs - Do we need 2 Scopes?

My company is a small paint company - we are currently QS registered under the second edition. We have a research and development lab and also a Quality Control lab. The research and development lab is "over" the QC lab. Pertaining to 4.10.6 - do we need two laboratory scopes?? If not, do I need to include the QC lab in the scope?? Are there any rough examples of a lab scope out there somewhere? Our next audit is the end of March and we must meet the third edition by this audit.

------------------

Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 20th January 1999, 09:09 PM
Batman
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dan Indish gave this link in response to my question similar to yours. It expounds on the 4.10.6 "Laboratory" but it is not completely clear to me. If you look to a couple of days ago in another thread, I asked a similar question - multiple areas defined as "lab."

I thought I was understanding this, but my MR just asked for instructions for all parts tested, and their respective standards - ASME, etc. However, the AIAG link does not state this specifically, i think.

Check the other threads in this area. Marc put in an expert's opinion, which seemed to clarify somewhat.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 26th January 1999, 09:45 AM
Roger Eastin Roger Eastin is offline
An Original Cover!

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
 
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54
Karma: 45
Roger Eastin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Does anyone have an example of a laboratory scope? Our metrology lab is being audited to QS, 3rd edition and needs a laboratory scope. By the way, why does QS specify that this must be a record as opposed to it being part of the lab manual? (I guess this reminds me of needing a form to fill out or something along those lines.) If anyone does, please mail it to roger.eastin@us.michelin.com. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Roger Eastin for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #4  
Old 27th January 1999, 11:06 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default

Quote:
Marc put in an expert's opinion, which seemed to clarify somewhat.
Ummm, yeah... Sorry I didn't get back into this. I think there's another thread with this as a topic. I've been busy as heck so I'm missing things here and there.

OK - First - I don't consider myself an expert. I put this site up and what is now the forum as you know it because I am NOT an expert, but an 'apprentice'. I have lured folks like Don Winton, Roger Eastin, Jon Shaver, Bryon Simmons, and - well, a whole bunch of people here. We each have out contributions and we're all learning.

Now - If you want to see some examples of SCOPEs, see the thread on A2LA and such in the calibration forum (I think). For example, see An 'old' Thread

Now - Which question have we not answered?....

Oh -
Quote:
Our metrology lab is being audited to QS, 3rd edition and needs a laboratory scope. By the way, why does QS specify that this must be a record as opposed to it being part of the lab manual? (I guess this reminds me of needing a form to fill out or something along those lines.)
Maybe I'm missing something in the interpretation. If it's in the Lab Manual, is the scope not documented? Is that not the requirement?

Also see 4.10.6 Supplier laboratory requirements - applicability - Lab thread in the 4.10 'section'.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th January 1999, 09:40 AM
Roger Eastin Roger Eastin is offline
An Original Cover!

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
 
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54
Karma: 45
Roger Eastin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Thanks for the threads (sounds like I'm a beatnik thanking you for some clothes that you gave me!). I would think that documenting a laboratory scope would be enough and maybe it is. I was just wondering why the QS manual states that it is a quality RECORD as opposed to a level 3 document that would be in a lab manual.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th July 1999, 04:12 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

A somewhat related tidbit:

Subject: Re: Q: QS-9000 /Keskitalo/Shibley
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:21:26 -0600
From: ISO Standards Discussion

From: PPPQC
Subject: Re: Q: QS-9000 /Keskitalo/Shibley

After bringing this question to our training consultant (CMTC of California), it was distinctly related to testing facilities that had chemical or metallurgical in house laboratories. The Calibration reference is only to the equipment used to test the chemical or metallurgical instruments. The definition of the scope in the glossary simply puts the word "May Include" which is of course not one of the many "Shalls" or "Shall nots of QS. After asking the same question to our accrediting auditor (TUV Rhineland) it was agreed upon that calibration of inspection equipment is not categorically online with "Laboratory Calibration. Element 4:11 is distinctly describing the areas of auditable zones for standard inspection tool calibration.

Dan Shibley
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16th March 2000, 11:38 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Covering Ass

Also see Laboratory Scope

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 22 March 2001).]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard > QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
About laboratory scopes published correctly from your accreditation body Ken11 ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 1 28th April 2009 05:11 PM
17025 Flexible Scopes of Accreditation - Laboratory to 'self-assess' new test method Simon123456 ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 2 2nd December 2004 02:29 AM
Research and Development Procss - Where does research end and development begin? mshell Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 15 18th September 2003 05:03 PM
Laboratory Scope - Need some advice regarding our Laboratory Scope S Roepstorff QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 9 4th April 2001 04:27 PM
A2LA/ISO GUIDE 25 QUALIFIED LABS WITH FLOW CALIBRATION IN THIER SCOPE DPAYNE@IMPCOTECHNOLOGIES. ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 1 27th October 1999 07:59 PM



The time now is 01:23 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts