The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29th March 2001, 02:15 PM
Diana3643
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Registration

I have taken a job with a very small (8 employees) company. They are mainly a Tool & Die Shop with a few non-automotive Production jobs. At the time of my interview they had been offered to run a Ford job by the Tier I supplier in which they had made the die for. Well, someone from Ford came and performed a Quality System Assesment with no Quality System in place they did not score well. Ford offered them time to get compliant to their requirements. From the time of the interview and my starting they lost the job. My issue is a lot bigger than what I realized it was. I mean they have no Quality Manual no Job Instruction nothing I am the Quality Department! and I am suppose to fix it. Ford has stated that they will evaluate them again in the future. Should I just prepare for ISO9000:2000 or QS9000?????
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 29th March 2001, 02:46 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Bomb!

QS if you are going to supply Ford. This forum will be of help so go through the different posts and begin your journey. There are many talented people here that can and do give assistance.

Note: Ford does not require QS, they require their own system, QOS, you can find it referenced in section II of QS 3rd Edition

ASD...

[This message has been edited by Al Dyer (edited 03 April 2001).]
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 3rd April 2001, 05:51 AM
outoftown outoftown is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cary, NC, USA
 
Posts: 23
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 123
outoftown has less than 100 Karma points so far.outoftown has less than 100 Karma points so far.
If Ford is your only customer of the Automotive OEMs, getting QS registration is not a requirment, but having a QS compliant system is. I would suggest start by getting the AIAG 7 pack + the Tooling & Equipment Supplement. Al Dyer is correct and that this forum is a great place for info.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd April 2001, 04:42 PM
Dan Larsen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Since you're in the automotive market area, I agree you should start with the QS documentation for now. Also make sure you get the T&E suppliments...designed for tooling manufacturers like yourself. You may find it useful in modifying some of the requirements for the smaller size of the business.

My last bit of advice is to not get discouraged. For a company with eight employees, QS is going to look like the proverbial mountain. But stay focused and try to read into it as much as possible. Be creative in applying the requirements and make the system work for YOU!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd April 2001, 12:42 PM
matthew evans matthew evans is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
 
Posts: 33
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 40
Karma: 10
matthew evans has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Thumbs up

FOR A SMALL COMPANY LIKE YOURSELVES YOU MAY BE BETTER TO GO FOR FORD'S Q1 AWARD. THIS INVOLVES GETTING ACCREDITED TO ISO9000 AND THEN SOME ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS.
YOU MUST BE A FORD SUPPLIER.
MUST USE QUALITY OPERATING SYSTEM.(INCLUDES R&M ACTIVITIES)
GAIN CUSTOMER ENDORSEMENTS.
HAVE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION METRICS.

IF YOU CONTACT FORD THEY WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE REQUIRED INFORMATION AS TO WHAT IS REQUIRED.
HOPE THIS HELPS.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24th April 2001, 01:26 PM
Fire Girl's Avatar
Fire Girl Fire Girl is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orillia, Ontario, Canada
Age: 34
 
Posts: 112
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 20
Fire Girl has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Spin!

Diana

I was in a similar situation to you. I started at a small company, less than 20 employees. When I came here they were supposed to be setting up an ISO 9000 system. There was much work to still be done! They have their ISO system now and it works all right but I don't feel that they use it to its full potential. We supply to automotive companies, but not tier 1. We do not have QS9000 but we do comply with their procedures for certain customers. ISO covers some of that stuff. Anyway, even with a small company I think a quality system is a good thing.

Not really helpful info but I thought you might like to know that you were not alone!

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th April 2001, 12:01 AM
Marilyn P
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
When we were working toward QS - in the early stages it was helpful to:

>flow chart our processes (start with raw material and end with finished product). This will give you an idea of what procedures and job instructions are required.

>It was helpful to us also to look over sample quality manuals and procedures manuals to see how others did it.

>Some folks also made the mistake early on of controlling all documents - such as writing job instructions for making coffee (yeah this really happened). They also made HR forms such as W4's and I-9's controlled docs...totally unnecessary.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Work Instructions/Job Aids in the Quality System pmags Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1 28th September 2009 12:46 PM
Covering Quality Manager/QMR JD (Job Description) with QMR Roles in Manual? beh anderson ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 17 5th November 2008 12:07 PM
How should I implement work instructions when we are sort of a job shop? alundy Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6 16th June 2006 11:54 AM
Job travellers/work instructions control E Wall QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1 14th August 2001 01:15 AM
Posting Of Work Instructions at Job Site louie Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7 19th February 2000 09:11 AM



The time now is 04:45 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts