The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd May 2001, 10:26 AM
Iceman Iceman is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Iceland
 
Posts: 7
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 10
Iceman has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question When to start a formal corrective action as a follow-up action after audits

We are reviewing our internal audit process. One thing to consider is when to start a formal corrective action as a follow-up action after audits. Is it advisable for all nonconformities, or just when a quick fix is not achievable? Comments?

Johann
Icelandic Aluminium Co. Ltd.
Iceland
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 23rd May 2001, 11:00 AM
Michael T's Avatar
Michael T Michael T is offline
Semper Gumby

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Age: 46
 
Posts: 287
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 43
Karma: 181
Michael T is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Michael T is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Yin Yang

Hi Iceman,

We have a follow-up or "audit" on each Corrective and Preventative Action item brought up, no matter how minute. It is actually part of the Request for Action (RFA) form we use to log and track CAR's & PAR's. Upon completion of the CAR/PAR, the RFA is logged into the system and I assign a follow-up date. This follow-up date is based upon the nature of the CAR/PAR and is designed to be timely, yet allow enough time for the action to be properly and thoroughly tested. If, during the follow-up, further corrective/preventative action is required, the matter is brought back before the Management Team or individual assiged to develop the resolution to the situation for further action.

Hope this helps.

Cheers!

Mike
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 23rd May 2001, 11:19 AM
Fire Girl's Avatar
Fire Girl Fire Girl is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orillia, Ontario, Canada
Age: 34
 
Posts: 112
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 20
Fire Girl has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Iceman

I believe you are asking about findings from internal audits and how they are handled. For any findings from Internal Auditing we issue a CPAR. There is a (reasonable) proposed close-out date. The Corrective or Preventive Action is checked for effectiveness. If it is still ineffective, it goes back to the Quality Board for re-evaluation. My personal feeling is that if I find problems while I'm doing internal auditing, chances are it is a problem. You might as well deal with it while it is a small problem, rather than wait until it is huge and your registrar finds it!

Hope this helps!

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd May 2001, 04:02 PM
Froggy
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
I Say...

Hi Iceman, I asked our external auditor the exact same question (do we have to write up "everything" esp. if it can be fixed immediately). His answer to me was, if you don't write up every one, how will you know whether or not you have a problem. I have informed my team of internal auditors to write up everything, in the hopes that as problems are corrected, we will eventually see a decrease in the amount of problems we have to write up.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd May 2001, 04:35 PM
energy
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Fire Girl,
Can you give an example of an ineffective CPAR? Does this determination occur on the date the CPAR is due? I have always had a hard time explaining effectiveness of a Corrective Action, other than it was corrected. Are we talking about repeat N/C's?
energy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd May 2001, 06:40 PM
Dan Larsen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Iceman,

I've used a system where the lead auditor (generally the Management Rep) has discriminatory authority to either issue an NCR or a "notice of issue". The CAR followed the classic approach for corrective action, the notice of issue was documented in an audit report that the auditee signed but a formal documented resolution was not required. The MR kept track of the notices and made them available to the auditors for subsequent audits. In many cases, the audit frequency was adjusted if a notice was issued.

We used a major/minor classification system to decide whether an NCR or notice would be desireable.

I typically use this type of system early in an implementation to minimize the amount of paperwork that could flood the system as the system gets up to speed. Many times, after about a year or so, it's almost easier to issue an NCR for all findings.

An additional note: the discretionary system was accepted easily by one registration auditor, but a second registration auditor felt it left room for abuse; he suggested "a finding is a finding" and an NCR should be issued for all findings.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th May 2001, 01:02 AM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Go for it Fire Girl!

ASD...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24th May 2001, 07:35 AM
Fire Girl's Avatar
Fire Girl Fire Girl is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orillia, Ontario, Canada
Age: 34
 
Posts: 112
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 20
Fire Girl has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I Say...

Energy

How you doin'?

Have you ever seen my CPAR form? There is a place to write a corrective or preventive action. Below that is a space to have the department manager to sign off that the corrective or preventive action has been implemented. Under that I get the QA Manager to sign off that the action was effective. Essentially, if you go back to do a 'follow-up audit' and the problem still exists, your corr/preve action was not effective. Go back to the ol' drawing board and figure out something else. Why, haven't you ever had this happen to you?



Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Should Preventative Action follow a Corrective Action Christopher S Nonconformance and Corrective Action 27 2nd November 2009 10:04 PM
Correction, Corrective Action, and Preventive Action differences - Internal Audits KidPaddy Internal Auditing 10 8th July 2009 07:13 AM
Corrective Action and Preventive Action - Where do I Start? jwendt2 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6 8th October 2003 11:12 AM
When is a Formal Corrective Action Necessary? barb butrym Nonconformance and Corrective Action 11 30th July 2003 02:55 AM
Corrective Action - Is the Follow up the Record? 4.2.4 ISO Cheesy Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 8 17th June 2003 04:34 PM



The time now is 08:56 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts